Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Invest Surg ; 35(7): 1544-1550, 2022 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35636767

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: We investigated the serum levels of MMPs and TIMPs in breast cancer (BC) patients to predict the response rate to/after treatment with or without neoadjuvant chemotherapy. BC is the most common cancer in women and MMPs are responsible for the breakdown of ECM proteins during organogenesis and TIMPs are restricted the ECM destruction by MMPs. However, the predictive role of MMPs and TIMPs in the treatment response of BC patients has not identified. METHODS: This study consisted of 96 BC patients (34 neoadjuvant treatment and 62 surgically treated) and 35 healthy individuals. ELISA was used to determine the level of MMP-2, MMP-9, TIMP-1, and TIMP-2 from serum samples of BC patients. RESULTS: The mean levels of MMP-9 and TIMP-2 were significantly increased in all BC patients at diagnosis and after chemotherapy, but MMP-2 was considerably lower at diagnosis. There was only a significant difference in the TIMP-1 levels after chemotherapy as well as HER2 and ER status in the neoadjuvant and surgically treated group. Additionally, MMP-2 and MMP-9 serum levels negatively correlated with tumor size and metastatic lymph nodes in BC patients after chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: BC patients with high levels of MMP-9 and TIMP-2 can be used to predict the stage of the tumor and CR to chemotherapy and higher TIMP-1 serum level after chemotherapy could be related to better response to chemotherapy.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama , Inibidor Tecidual de Metaloproteinase-1 , Neoplasias da Mama/tratamento farmacológico , Feminino , Humanos , Metaloproteinase 2 da Matriz/metabolismo , Metaloproteinase 9 da Matriz/metabolismo , Metaloproteinases da Matriz/metabolismo , Inibidor Tecidual de Metaloproteinase-1/metabolismo , Inibidor Tecidual de Metaloproteinase-2/metabolismo
2.
Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992) ; 68(2): 142-146, 2022 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35239872

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The vast majority of patients who hospitalized with coronavirus disease 2019 are given empirical antibiotic therapy. However, information on the frequency, microorganism species, and resistance rates of secondary bacterial infections in coronavirus disease 2019 patients are insufficient. We aimed to show the frequency of secondary infections and resistance conditions in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 hospitalized in the intensive care unit. METHODS: The results of tracheal aspirate culture, blood culture, and urine culture obtained from coronavirus disease 2019 patients - at least 2 days after their admission to the intensive care unit - were examined microbiologically. RESULTS: A total of 514 patients hospitalized in intensive care unit were included in our study. Tracheal aspirate, blood, or urine cultures were collected from 369 patients (71.8%). Bacterial reproduction was detected in at least one sample in 171 (33.3%) of all patients. The rate of respiratory tract infection and/or bloodstream infection was found to be 21%. Acinetobacter baumannii, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa in tracheal aspirate culture; Coagulase-negative staphylococci, K. pneumoniae, and A. baumannii in blood culture; and Escherichia coli, K. pneumoniae, and Enterococcus faecalis in urine culture were the most common microorganisms. A. baumannii was resistant to most antibiotics except colistin and P. aeruginosa strains were resistant to most antibiotics except amikacin, colistin, cefepime, and imipenem. In K. pneumoniae, the highest meropenem sensitivity (73%) was observed; there was a strong resistance to most of the remaining antibiotics. CONCLUSIONS: We think that our study can be useful in choosing empirical antibiotic therapy in the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic and reducing the mortality that may occur with secondary infection.


Assuntos
Acinetobacter baumannii , Infecções Bacterianas , COVID-19 , Coinfecção , Pneumonia , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Infecções Bacterianas/complicações , Infecções Bacterianas/tratamento farmacológico , COVID-19/complicações , Humanos , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Pseudomonas aeruginosa , SARS-CoV-2
3.
Rev. Assoc. Med. Bras. (1992, Impr.) ; 68(2): 142-146, Feb. 2022. tab
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS | ID: biblio-1365338

RESUMO

SUMMARY OBJECTIVE: The vast majority of patients who hospitalized with coronavirus disease 2019 are given empirical antibiotic therapy. However, information on the frequency, microorganism species, and resistance rates of secondary bacterial infections in coronavirus disease 2019 patients are insufficient. We aimed to show the frequency of secondary infections and resistance conditions in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 hospitalized in the intensive care unit. METHODS: The results of tracheal aspirate culture, blood culture, and urine culture obtained from coronavirus disease 2019 patients - at least 2 days after their admission to the intensive care unit - were examined microbiologically. RESULTS: A total of 514 patients hospitalized in intensive care unit were included in our study. Tracheal aspirate, blood, or urine cultures were collected from 369 patients (71.8%). Bacterial reproduction was detected in at least one sample in 171 (33.3%) of all patients. The rate of respiratory tract infection and/or bloodstream infection was found to be 21%. Acinetobacter baumannii, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa in tracheal aspirate culture; Coagulase-negative staphylococci, K. pneumoniae, and A. baumannii in blood culture; and Escherichia coli, K. pneumoniae, and Enterococcus faecalis in urine culture were the most common microorganisms. A. baumannii was resistant to most antibiotics except colistin and P. aeruginosa strains were resistant to most antibiotics except amikacin, colistin, cefepime, and imipenem. In K. pneumoniae, the highest meropenem sensitivity (73%) was observed; there was a strong resistance to most of the remaining antibiotics. CONCLUSIONS: We think that our study can be useful in choosing empirical antibiotic therapy in the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic and reducing the mortality that may occur with secondary infection.


Assuntos
Humanos , Pneumonia , Infecções Bacterianas/complicações , Infecções Bacterianas/tratamento farmacológico , Acinetobacter baumannii , Coinfecção , Pseudomonas aeruginosa , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , SARS-CoV-2 , COVID-19/complicações , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico
4.
Int J Antimicrob Agents ; 59(1): 106489, 2022 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34848325

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to determine the in vitro efficacy of intravenous (IV) fosfomycin against extensively drug-resistant Enterobacterales strains and the effect of glucose 6-phosphate (G6-P) on sensitivity results. MATERIAL METHOD: Thirty-two extensively drug-resistant Klebsiella pneumonia strains were included in the study. Detection of the carbapenemase genes was performed using the Gene-Xpert® System Carba R® kit. Susceptibility of IV fosfomycin was assessed using the agar dilution method. The agar dilution method was repeated using Muller-Hinton Agar medium without G6-P to assess the effect of G6-P on sensitivity results. RESULTS: All strains in the study produced carbapenemases and were resistant to all drugs tested, including carbapenems, piperacillin-tazobactam, ceftriaxone, and ceftazidime. Fosfomycin resistance was detected in 3 (9.3%) strains. When the sensitivity test was repeated without G6-P, fosfomycin resistance was detected in 82.7% of the fosfomycin-susceptible strains. The Gene-Xpert® System showed NDM-1 in 46.8%, OXA-48 in 18.7%, KPC in 3.1%, and NDM-1 + OXA-48 in 21.8% of the strains. OXA-48 was detected in one of the resistant strains, and none of the viable genes were detected in two of the resistant strains. CONCLUSION: This study shows that IV fosfomycin is a potentially important treatment alternative for infections caused by common resistant strains. Accurate results may not be obtained unless G6-P is used in the agar dilution method for in vitro susceptibility studies of fosfomycin.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Enterobacteriáceas Resistentes a Carbapenêmicos/efeitos dos fármacos , Enterobacteriáceas Resistentes a Carbapenêmicos/genética , Fosfomicina/uso terapêutico , Infecções por Klebsiella/tratamento farmacológico , Klebsiella pneumoniae/efeitos dos fármacos , Klebsiella pneumoniae/genética , Administração Intravenosa , Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Fosfomicina/administração & dosagem , Variação Genética , Genótipo , Glucose-6-Fosfato/metabolismo , Humanos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...