Contrast Staining in Noninfarcted Tissue after Endovascular Treatment of Acute Ischemic Stroke.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Contrast staining is a common finding after endovascular treatment of acute ischemic stroke. It typically occurs in infarcted tissue and is considered an indicator of irreversible brain damage. Contrast staining in noninfarcted tissue has not been systematically investigated. We sought to assess the incidence, risk factors, and clinical significance of contrast staining in noninfarcted tissue after endovascular treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of consecutive patients who underwent endovascular treatment for anterior circulation large-vessel occlusion acute ischemic stroke. Contrast staining, defined as new hyperdensity on CT after endovascular treatment, was categorized as either contrast staining in infarcted tissue if the stained region demonstrated restricted diffusion on follow-up MR imaging or contrast staining in noninfarcted tissue if the stained region demonstrated no restricted diffusion. Baseline differences between patients with and without contrast staining in noninfarcted tissue were compared. Logistic regression was used to identify independent associations for contrast staining in noninfarcted tissue after endovascular treatment. RESULTS: Among 194 patients who underwent endovascular treatment for large-vessel occlusion acute ischemic stroke and met the inclusion criteria, contrast staining in infarcted tissue was noted in 52/194 (26.8%) patients; contrast staining in noninfarcted tissue, in 26 (13.4%) patients. Both contrast staining in infarcted tissue and contrast staining in noninfarcted tissue were noted in 5.6% (11/194). Patients with contrast staining in noninfarcted tissue were found to have a higher likelihood of having an ASPECTS of 8-10, to be associated with contrast staining in infarcted tissue, and to achieve successful reperfusion compared with those without contrast staining in noninfarcted tissue. In contrast staining in noninfarcted tissue regions, the average attenuation was 40 HU, significantly lower than the contrast staining in infarcted tissue regions (53 HU). None of the patients with contrast staining in noninfarcted tissue had clinical worsening during their hospital stay. The median discharge mRS was significantly lower in patients with contrast staining in noninfarcted tissue than in those without (3 versus 4; P = .018). No independent predictors of contrast staining in noninfarcted tissue were found. CONCLUSIONS: Contrast staining can be seen outside the infarcted tissue after endovascular treatment of acute ischemic stroke, likely attributable to the reversible disruption of the BBB in ischemic but not infarcted tissue. While generally benign, understanding its characteristics is important because it may mimic pathologic conditions such as infarcted tissue and cerebral edema.

Endovascular Therapy for Acute Stroke: New Evidence and Indications.

Endovascular therapy (EVT) has revolutionized the treatment of acute ischemic stroke. In the past few years, endovascular treatment indications have expanded to include patients being treated in the extended window, with large ischemic core infarction, basilar artery occlusion (BAO) thrombectomy, as demonstrated by several randomized clinical trials. Intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) bridging to mechanical thrombectomy has also been studied via several randomized clinical trials, with the overall results indicating that IVT should not be skipped in patients who are candidates for both IVT and EVT. Simplification of neuroimaging protocols in the extended window to permit non-contrast CT, CTA collaterals have also expanded access to mechanical thrombectomy, particularly in regions across the world where access to advanced imaging may not be available. Ongoing study of areas to develop include rescue stenting in patients with failed thrombectomy, medium vessel occlusion thrombectomy, and carotid tandem occlusions. In this narrative review, we summarize recent trials and key data in the treatment of patients with large ischemic core infarct, simplification of neuroimaging protocols for the treatment of patients presenting in the late window, bridging thrombolysis, and BAO EVT evidence. We also summarize areas of ongoing study including medium and distal vessel occlusion.

Crossover from Femoral to Radial Access During Mechanical Thrombectomy of Large Vessel Occlusion Stroke.

BACKGROUND: Challenging arterial anatomy may prevent timely endovascular treatment (EVT) of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) through a transfemoral approach prompting the use of alternative access routes. We determined the crossover rate from femoral to radial access during EVT of AIS due to large vessel occlusion and identified its radiological predictors and clinical outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective review of all AIS patients who underwent EVT at a single institution from January 2016 to March 2021 was performed. A primary and a secondary radial group depending on whether the radial approach was used primarily or secondary to failure of transfemoral approach were compared. RESULTS: A total of 358 consecutive AIS patients with large vessel occlusion underwent EVT. Radial approach was used primarily in 6 patients (primary radial [PR]) and secondarily in 16 patients (secondary radial [SR]). The rate of femoral to radial crossover was 4.7%. Type III arch and bovine arch configurations were the most common characteristic in the crossover group. Radial access was successful to secure intracranial access in all cases of PR and in 87% of crossover cases. There was no significant difference between the rates of successful reperfusion (53.3% SR, 83% PR, P = 0.20), National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score on discharge (19 SR, 18 PR group, P = 0.90), or good outcome defined as modified Rankin Scale score 0-2 (13.3% SR, 33.3% PR, P = 0.29). CONCLUSIONS: A radial approach can be considered during EVT of AIS due to large vessel occlusion either primarily or secondarily with a lower threshold to switch from the femoral approach in cases of challenging anatomy.

History of Neurointervention.

In this review article, we aim to provide a summary of the discoveries and developments that were instrumental in the evolution of the Neurointerventional field. We begin with developments in the advent of Diagnostic Cerebral Angiography and progress to cerebral aneurysm treatment, embolization in AVMs and ischemic stroke treatment. In the process we discuss many persons who were key in the development and maturation of the field. A pivotal aspect to rapid growth in the field has been the multidisciplinary involvement of the different neuroscience specialties and therefore we close out our discussion with excitement about ongoing and future developments in the field with a focus on treatments in the non-cerebrovascular disease realm.

Balloon Gliding Technique: A novel use of balloon guiding catheters in accessing challenging circulations when treating acute ischemic stroke.

BACKGROUND: Challenging arterial anatomy delays, or prevents timely endovascular treatment (EVT) of acute ischemic stroke (AIS). We introduce a new technique called 'Balloon Gliding Technique (BGT)' to overcome difficult arterial anatomy during EVT of AIS, utilizing flow-assistance to access challenging circulations. METHODS: Retrospective review of a prospectively collected database of all patients presenting to a single institution with AIS who underwent EVT was performed from January 2021 to June 2021. Patients in whom BGT was performed were assessed. BGT consists of advancing the balloon guide catheter in the cervical carotid artery while its balloon is inflated, and therefore carried by downstream flow. RESULTS: Of 51 patients presenting with AIS secondary to large vessel occlusion during the study period, five patients underwent BGT. All five patients had anterior circulation large vessel occlusions. Mean age of the BGT patients was 92.2 years, and all patients were females. A type 3 arch was present in all patients. BGT was performed in all cases following initial failure of conventional techniques to cannulate the target circulation. BGT was successful in achieving distal cervical carotid access in 4 out of the 5 patients in whom BGT was attempted. Successful recanalization (modified treatment in cerebral ischemia 2b-3) was obtained in all cases with no complications. CONCLUSIONS: Balloon Gliding Technique (BGT) is a safe technique that can safely overcome challenging anatomy during endovascular treatment of acute ischemic stroke. Further studies can assist in demonstrating both its safety and effectiveness.

Acute occlusion of the fetal posterior cerebral artery: diagnosis and management paradigms.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The diagnosis and management of acute fetal posterior cerebral artery occlusion are challenging. While endovascular treatment is established for anterior circulation large vessel occlusion stroke, little is known about the course of acute fetal posterior cerebral artery occlusions. We report the clinical course, radiological findings and management considerations of acute fetal posterior cerebral artery occlusion stroke. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of consecutive patients presenting with acute large vessel occlusion who underwent cerebral angiogram and/or mechanical thrombectomy between January 2015 and January 2021. Patients diagnosed with fetal posterior cerebral artery occlusion were included. Demographic data, clinical presentation, imaging findings and management strategies were reviewed. RESULTS: Between January 2015 and January 2021, three patients with fetal posterior cerebral artery occlusion were identified from 400 patients who underwent angiogram and/or mechanical thrombectomy for acute stroke (0.75%). The first patient presented with concomitant fetal posterior cerebral artery and middle cerebral artery occlusions. Thrombectomy was performed with recanalisation of the fetal posterior cerebral artery but the patient died from malignant oedema. The second patient presented with isolated fetal posterior cerebral artery occlusion. No endovascular intervention was performed and the patient was disabled from malignant posterior cerebral artery infarct. The third patient presented with carotid occlusion and was found to have fetal posterior cerebral artery occlusion after internal carotid artery recanalisation. No further intervention was performed. The patient was left with residual contralateral homonymous hemianopia and mild left sided weakness. CONCLUSION: Fetal posterior cerebral artery occlusion is a rare, but potentially disabling, cause of ischaemic stroke. Endovascular treatment is feasible. Further investigation is needed to compare the efficacy of medical versus endovascular management strategies.