RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate an institutional practice change from an extracorporeal life support (ECLS) anticoagulation monitoring strategy of activated clotting time (ACT) alone to a multimodal strategy including ACT, activated partial thrombin time, heparin anti-factor-Xa, and thromboelastography. METHODS: This was a retrospective review of patients younger than 18 years on ECLS and heparin between January 2014 and June 2020 at a single institution. RESULTS: Twenty-seven patients used an ACT-directed strategy and 25 used a multimodal strategy. The ACT-directed group was on ECLS for a shorter median duration than the multimodal group (136 versus 164 hours; p = 0.046). There was a non-significant increase in major hemorrhage (85.1% versus 60%; p = 0.061) and a significantly higher incidence of central nervous system (CNS) hemorrhage in the ACT-directed group (29.6% versus 0%; p = 0.004). Rates of thrombosis were similar, with a median of 3 circuit changes per group (p = 0.921). The ACT-directed group had larger median heparin doses (55 versus 34 units/kg/hr; p < 0.001), required more dose adjustments per day (3.8 versus 1.7; p < 0.001), and had higher rates of heparin doses >50 units/kg/hr (62.9% versus 16%; p = 0.001). More anticoagulation parameters were supratherapeutic (p = 0.015) and fewer were therapeutic (p < 0.001) in the ACT-directed group. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with a multimodal strategy for monitoring anticoagulation during ECLS had lower rates of CNS hemorrhage and decreased need for large heparin doses of >50 units/kg/hr without an increase in clotting complications, compared with ACT-directed anticoagulation. Multimodal anticoagulation monitoring appears superior to ACT-only strategies and may reduce heparin exposure and risk of hemorrhagic complications for pediatric patients on ECLS.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Asthma is the most common chronic disease of childhood. Although asthma admissions to the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) are increasing, there are no evidence-based guidelines on preferred escalation of therapies for patients with status asthmaticus who fail to respond to inhaled bronchodilators and systemic corticosteroids. The purpose of this study was to assess outcomes of PICU patients receiving aminophylline versus terbutaline as second-tier therapies for status asthmaticus. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study using Pediatric Health Information System from 2016-2019. SETTING: Fifty-three tertiary children's hospitals. SUBJECTS: Children aged 2 to 18 years admitted to the PICU in children's hospitals contributing data to the Pediatric Health Information System with a primary diagnosis of status asthmaticus. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Of 11 133 pediatric patients treated for status asthmaticus in the PICU during the study period, 1144 received either terbutaline or aminophylline. There was no difference in intubation and mechanical ventilation between patients who received aminophylline and those who received terbutaline. However, in African American patients, those who received terbutaline had a significantly higher odds of intubation and mechanical ventilation compared to those who received aminophylline (OR, 12.41; 95%CI, 1.61,95). CONCLUSIONS: The use of aminophylline is associated with lower odds of intubation and mechanical ventilation in African American patients with status asthmaticus as compared to terbutaline.
