Identifying IDH-mutant and 1p/19q noncodeleted astrocytomas from nonenhancing gliomas: Manual recognition followed by artificial intelligence recognition.

Background: The T2-FLAIR mismatch sign (T2FM) has nearly 100% specificity for predicting IDH-mutant and 1p/19q noncodeleted astrocytomas (astrocytomas). However, only 18.2%-56.0% of astrocytomas demonstrate a positive T2FM. Methods must be considered for distinguishing astrocytomas from negative T2FM gliomas. In this study, positive T2FM gliomas were manually distinguished from nonenhancing gliomas, and then a support vector machine (SVM) classification model was used to distinguish astrocytomas from negative T2FM gliomas. Methods: Nonenhancing gliomas (regardless of pathological type or grade) diagnosed between January 2022 and October 2022 (N = 300) and November 2022 and March 2023 (N = 196) will comprise the training and validation sets, respectively. Our method for distinguishing astrocytomas from nonenhancing gliomas was examined and validated using the training set and validation set. Results: The specificity of T2FM for predicting astrocytomas was 100% in both the training and validation sets, while the sensitivity was 42.75% and 67.22%, respectively. Using a classification model of SVM based on radiomics features, among negative T2FM gliomas, the accuracy was above 85% when the prediction score was greater than 0.70 in identifying astrocytomas and above 95% when the prediction score was less than 0.30 in identifying nonastrocytomas. Conclusions: Manual screening of positive T2FM gliomas, followed by the SVM classification model to differentiate astrocytomas from negative T2FM gliomas, may be a more effective method for identifying astrocytomas in nonenhancing gliomas.

Distinguishing Tumor Cell Infiltration and Vasogenic Edema in the Peritumoral Region of Glioblastoma at the Voxel Level via Conventional MRI Sequences.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: The peritumoral region of glioblastoma (GBM) is composed of infiltrating tumor cells and vasogenic edema, which are difficult to distinguish manually on MRI. To distinguish tumor cell infiltration and vasogenic edema in GBM peritumoral regions, it is crucial to develop a method that is precise, effective, and widely applicable. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrieved the image characteristics of 379,730 voxels (marker of tumor infiltration) from 28 non-enhanced gliomas and 365,262 voxels (marker of edema) from the peritumoral edema region of 14 meningiomas on conventional MRI sequences (T1-weighted image, the contrast-enhancing T1-weighted image, the T2-weighted image, the T2-fluid attenuated inversion recovery image, and the apparent diffusion coefficient map). Using the SVM classifier, a model for predicting tumor cell infiltration and vasogenic edema at the voxel level was developed. The accuracy of the model's predictions was then evaluated using 15 GBM patients who underwent stereotactic biopsies. RESULTS: The area under the curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of the prediction model were 0.93, 0.84, 0.83, and 0.85 in the training set, and 0.90, 0.82, 0.83, and 0.83 in the test set (704,992 voxels), respectively. The pathology verification of 28 biopsy points with an accuracy of 0.79. CONCLUSION: At the voxel level, it seems possible to forecast tumor cell infiltration and vasogenic edema in the peritumoral region of GBM based on conventional MRI sequences.