Relationship among circulating tumor cells, CEA and overall survival in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: We previously reported results of a prospective trial evaluating the significance of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). This secondary analysis assessed the relationship of the CTC number with carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and overall survival. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with mCRC had CTCs measured at baseline and specific time points after the initiation of new therapy. Patients with a baseline CEA value ≥ 10 ng/ml and CEA measurements within ± 30 days of the CTC collection were included. RESULTS: We included 217 patients with mCRC who had a CEA value of ≥ 10 ng/ml. Increased baseline CEA was associated with shorter survival (15.8 versus 20.7 months, P = 0.012). Among all patients with a baseline CEA value of ≥ 25 ng/ml, patients with low baseline CTCs (<3, n = 99) had longer survival than those with high CTCs (≥ 3, n = 58; 20.8 versus 11.7 months, P = 0.001). CTCs added prognostic information at the 3-5- and 6-12-week time points regardless of CEA. In a multivariate analysis, CTCs at baseline but not CEA independently predicted survival and both CTCs and CEA independently predicted survival at 6-12 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that both CEA and CTCs contribute prognostic information for patients with mCRC.

Prognostic significance of circulating tumor cells in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: We demonstrated that circulating tumor cell (CTC) number at baseline and follow-up is an independent prognostic factor in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). This analysis was undertaken to explore whether patient and treatment characteristics impact the prognostic value of CTCs. PATIENTS AND METHODS: CTCs were enumerated with immunomagnetic separation from the blood of 430 patients with mCRC at baseline and on therapy. Patients were stratified into unfavorable and favorable prognostic groups based on CTC levels of > or = 3 or <3 CTCs/7.5 ml, respectively. Subgroups were analyzed by line of treatment, liver involvement, receipt of oxaliplatin, irinotecan, or bevacizumab, age, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS). RESULTS: Seventy-one percent of deaths have occurred. Median follow-up for living patients is 25.8 months. For all patients, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) for unfavorable compared with favorable baseline CTCs is shorter (4.4 versus 7.8 m, P = 0.004 for PFS; 9.4 versus 20.6 m, P < 0.0001 for OS). In all patient subgroups, unfavorable baseline CTC was associated with inferior OS (P < 0.001). In patients receiving first- or second-line therapy (P = 0.003), irinotecan (P = 0.0001), having liver involvement (P = 0.002), >/=65 years (P = 0.0007), and ECOG PS of zero (P = 0.04), unfavorable baseline CTC was associated with inferior PFS. CONCLUSION: Baseline CTC count is an important prognostic factor within specific subgroups defined by treatment or patient characteristics.

Cyclosporine treatment of refractory T-cell lymphomas.

BACKGROUND: Cyclosporine (cyclosporin A, CSA) prolongs the survival of transplanted organs by reducing the transcription of cytokines, especially interleukin-2, that are thought to mediate T-cell expansion and subsequent graft rejection. Recently, CSA has been suggested as a potentially effective agent in the treatment of T-cell neoplasms. As a result, a Phase II trial of CSA was done in patients with refractory T-cell lymphomas. METHODS: Patients with peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL) or cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) who had disease progression after at least one previous therapy were eligible for participation. CSA was administered orally at a dose of 7.5 mg/kg twice daily, and the patients were followed for disease response and toxicity. RESULTS: A total of 16 patients were treated. Five patients had PTCL, and 11 had CTCL. Most patients were pretreated extensively with chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy. No responses occurred in patients with PTCL. Two of 11 patients with CTCL responded to therapy. Both patients who responded to CSA had recurrent disease that approached baseline levels within 1 week of discontinuing therapy. A second response occurred in both patients after reinstitution of therapy. Although most patients were removed from the study because of disease progression, renal toxicity was significant. CONCLUSIONS: Most patients with refractory T-cell lymphomas did not respond to CSA, suggesting that these malignancies are not interleukin-2 dependent or, alternatively, that CSA did not reach its intracellular target. In the two responding patients, the pattern of repeated rapid regression of disease after CSA administration and subsequent rapid recurrence after a temporary halt in therapy suggested that CSA was cytostatic rather than cytocidal or that the clinical remissions were mediated by the antiinflammatory effects of the drug.