The use of national collaborative to promote advanced practice registered nurse-led high-value care initiatives.

BACKGROUND: High-value healthcare focuses on improving healthcare to produce cost effective care, however limited information on the role of advanced practice registered nurses (APRNs) exists. PURPOSE: This descriptive report describes APRN-led initiatives implemented as part of a national collaborative promoting the Choosing Wisely® campaign and high-value care measures. METHOD: An APRN national collaborative focuses on developing and implementing high-value care initiatives. Monthly calls, podcasts, and a file sharing platform are used to facilitate the work of the national collaborative. FINDINGS: A total of 16 APRN teams from 14 states are participating and have implemented a number of initiatives to reduce unnecessary testing and treatments, promote appropriate antibiotic use, and promote optimal clinical practices such as mobility for hospitalized elderly patients, among others. DISCUSSION: A national collaborative has proven to be a successful way to engage APRN teams to focus on targeting high-value care and promoting evidence-based practices in clinical care.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors and radiosurgery for newly diagnosed melanoma brain metastases.

INTRODUCTION: Brain metastases are common in metastatic melanoma and radiosurgery is often utilized for local control. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) play a central role in contemporary melanoma management; however, there is limited data exploring outcomes and potential toxicities for patients treated with CPIs and radiosurgery. METHODS: We retrospectively identified all consecutive cases of newly diagnosed melanoma brain metastases (MBM) treated with Gamma Knife radiosurgery at a single institution between 2012 and 2017, and included only patients that initiated CPIs within 8 weeks before or after radiosurgery. RESULTS: Thirty-eight patients were included with a median follow-up of 31.6 months. Two-year local control was 92%. Median time to out-of-field CNS and extra-CNS progression were 8.4 and 7.9 months, respectively. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 3.4 months and median overall survival (OS) was not reached (NR). Twenty-five patients (66%) received anti-CTLA4 and 13 patients (34%) received anti-PD-1+/-anti-CTLA4. Compared with anti-CTLA4, patients that received anti-PD-1+/-anti-CTLA4 had significant improvements in time to out-of-field CNS progression (p = 0.049), extra-CNS progression (p = 0.015), and PFS (p = 0.043), with median time to out-of-field CNS progression of NR vs. 3.1 months, median time to extra-CNS progression of NR vs. 4.4 months, and median PFS of 20.3 vs. 2.4 months. Six patients (16%) developed grade ≥ 2 CNS toxicities (grade 2: 3, grade 3: 3, grade 4/5: 0). CONCLUSIONS: Excellent outcomes were observed in patients that initiated CPIs within 8 weeks of undergoing radiosurgery for newly diagnosed MBM. There appears to be an advantage to anti-PD-1 or combination therapy compared to anti-CTLA4.

Four-year Survival (and Counting) after Stereotactic Radiosurgery to Nearly 100 Brain Metastases: A Case Report.

Brain metastases are a relatively common consequence of Stage IV melanoma. Historically, patients with brain metastases fare poorly, with median survival of only weeks to months. Patients with multiple metastases in the brain have often been overlooked in the literature, with the focus being placed more on patients with only a small number of metastases. The authors present a case of a 42-year-old man with a total of 98 brain metastases treated over several Gamma Knife sessions. He is nearly five years out from his initial treatment. This case highlights the fact that there is a large amount of variability in survival after diagnosis with brain metastases. Selection for treatment should be based on the clinical picture and clinicians should take care to avoid selection bias in this population.

Current and evolving management of traumatic brain injury.

This article discuss the pathophysiology of traumatic brain injury and increased intracranial pressure, the consequences and treatment of secondary insults, and strategies for the medical and nursing management of the patient who has traumatic brain injury.

A prospective, multicenter pilot study to evaluate the feasibility and safety of using the CoolGard System and Icy catheter following cardiac arrest.

BACKGROUND: Cardiac arrest causes devastating neurological morbidity and mortality. Mild/moderate hypothermia is neuroprotective after global cerebral ischemia. More rapid controlled attainment of the target temperature may increase efficacy. METHODS: We assessed the safety and feasibility of endovascular cooling in a single arm study of comatose patients who had been successfully resuscitated after cardiac arrest. Core temperature was reduced to a target of 33 degrees C for 24 h using a closed loop endovascular system placed in the inferior vena cava, followed by controlled rewarming. Primary outcomes were speed and accuracy of cooling, survival and GOS after 30 days. RESULTS: Thirteen patients were enrolled, six male, age 60 +/- 19 years. Time from cardiac arrest to return of spontaneous circulation was 14.3 min (range 5-32.5). It took 3h and 39 min (median 210 min, IQ 80-315) to reach 33 degrees C; cooling averaged 0.8 +/- 0.3 degrees C/h (range 0.22-1.12 degrees C/h). Temperature was tightly maintained for all patients averaging 32.7 +/- 0.5 degrees C. Rewarming lasted 18.3 +/- 5.9 h. Five patients (38%) had 30-day Glasgow Outcome Scores of 1-2. Four patients died, none related to the hypothermia procedure. No unanticipated or procedure-related adverse events occurred. CONCLUSION: In comatose survivors of cardiac arrest, hypothermia via endovascular methods is safe and feasible, and target temperatures can be achieved and controlled rapidly and precisely. More studies are needed to assess the efficacy of rapid endovascular hypothermia after cardiac arrest.