RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Lung transplant (LT) recipients require multidisciplinary care because of the complexity of therapeutic management. Pharmacists are able to detect drug-related problems and provide recommendations to physicians through pharmacists' interventions (PIs). We aimed at assessing the clinical impact of PIs on therapeutic management in LT outpatients. DESIGN: Data were collected prospectively from an LT recipients cohort during 7 years. A multidisciplinary committee assessed retrospectively the clinical impact of accepted PIs. SETTING: French University Hospital. PARTICIPANTS: LT outpatients followed from 2009 to 2015. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Clinical impact of PIs performed by pharmacists using the CLEO tool and the Pareto chart. RESULTS: 1449 PIs led to a change in patient therapeutic management and were mainly related to wrong dosage (39.6%) and untreated indication (19.6%). The clinical impact of PIs was 'avoids fatality', 'major' and 'moderate', in 0.1%, 7.0% and 57.9%, respectively. Immunosuppressants, antimycotics for systemic use and antithrombotic agents had the greatest clinical impact according to the Pareto chart. PIs related to drug-drug interactions (10%) mainly had a moderate and major clinical impact (82.3%, p<0.0001). CONCLUSION: Clinical pharmacists play a key role for detecting drug-related problems mostly leading to a change in therapeutic management among LT outpatients. Our study provides a new insight to analyse the clinical impact of PIs in order to target PIs which have most value and contribute to patient care through interdisciplinary approach.
Assuntos
Farmacêuticos , Adolescente , Adulto , Criança , Feminino , Humanos , Pulmão , Transplante de Pulmão , Masculino , Erros de Medicação , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pacientes Ambulatoriais , Serviço de Farmácia Hospitalar , Papel Profissional , Estudos Retrospectivos , Adulto JovemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is increasingly used as a bridge to lung transplantation (LTx). However, data concerning this approach remain limited. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of all patients in France who received ECMO as a bridge to LTx from 2007 to 2011. Post-transplant survival and associated factors were assessed by the Kaplan-Meier method and the Cox model. RESULTS: Included were 36 patients from 11 centers. Indications for LTx were cystic fibrosis (CF) in 20 (56%), pulmonary fibrosis (PF) in 11 (30%), and other diagnoses in 5 (14%). ECMO was venovenous for 27 patients (75%) and venoarterial for 9 (25%). Mean follow-up was 17 months. Bridging to LTx was achieved in 30 patients (83%); however, only 27 patients (75%) survived the LTx procedure, and 20 (56%) were discharged from hospital. From ECMO initiation, 2-year survival rates were 50.4% overall, 71.0% for CF patients, 27.3% for PF patients, and 20.0% for other patients (p < 0.001). From LTx, 2-year survival rates were 60.5% overall, 71.0% for CF patients, 42.9% for PF patients, and 33.0% for other patients (p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Our study confirms that the use of ECMO as a bridge to LTx in France could provide a medium-term survival benefit for LTx recipients with critical conditions. Survival differed by underlying respiratory disease. Larger studies are needed to further define the optimal use of ECMO.