Impact of renal retransplantation on graft and recipient survival.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of retransplantation in graft and recipient survival. METHODS: We carried out a retrospective study in 419 renal transplants and studied the influence of retransplantation in graft and patient survival. A homogeneity study was performed between the two groups with a Student`s T and a chi-square tests. Graft survival analysis was performed with Kaplan-Meyer and log rank tests. RESULTS: Of 419 transplants, 370 (88.3%) were first transplantations, 45 (10.7%) second transplantations and 4(1%) third ones. Mean follow-up of the whole group was 72.5 months (±54.1 SD). There were no differences in follow-up between groups (Mean Follow-up 73.1 months ±54.4 SD in first transplantations vs. 61.6 months ±51.2 SD in repeat transplantation. p >0.05). The actuarial graft survival showed no differences between patients with first transplantation and those with a repeat one. [3 and 5 year SV of 89% (95% CI: 87-91%) and 84%(95% CI: 82-86%) Vs 88% (95% CI; 83-93%) and 85% (95% CI:i; 80-90%) respectively]. After adjusting for all the heterogeneity variables we still did not find differences on graft survival. The actuarial recipient survival showed no differences between patients with first transplantation and those with a repeat one. [3 and 5 year SV of 98% and 96% Vs.97%]. CONCLUSIONS: There are no differences of graft and recipient survival between patients with a first transplantation and those with a repeat one.

Impacto del retrasplante renal en la supervivencia del injerto y receptor / Impact of renal retransplantation on graft and recipient survival

OBJETIVO: Nuestro objetivo es valorar si un segundo o tercer trasplante tienen influencia en la supervivencia del injerto renal y en la del receptor.MÉTODOS: Analizamos retrospectivamente 419 trasplantes renales consecutivos realizados entre 1994 y 2010, analizando la influencia del retrasplante en la supervivencia del injerto renal. Se ha realizado un estudio de homogeneidad de los dos grupos mediante Tablas de contingencia para las variables cualitativas y t de student para las cuantitativas. La supervivencia y comparación de supervivencia con Kaplan-Meyer y log-rank..RESULTADOS: De los 419 trasplantes, 370 (88,3%) fueron primeros trasplantes 45(10,7%) segundos trasplantes y 4(1%) terceros. Media de seguimiento de todo el grupo de 72,5 meses (+/- 54,1 DE) y mediana de 68,8 meses( Rango de 0 a 188 meses ).No existen diferencias en el tiempo de seguimiento (Media del grupo de pacientes con un solo trasplante de 73,1 meses +/-54,4DE Vs. 61,6 meses +/-51,2DE del grupo de pacientes retrasplantados. p >0,05).El análisis de la supervivencia actuarial del injerto revela que no existen diferencias estadísticamente significativas entre los pacientes con un primer trasplante y los retrasplantados [SPV 89% (95% IC; 87- 91%) y 84% (95% IC; 82-86%) a los 3 y 5 años frente a 88% (95% IC; 83-93%) a los 3 años y 85% (95% IC; 80-90%) a los 5 años]. Al ajustar por las variables para las que los grupos no fueron homogeneos las diferencias se siguen manteniendo.El análisis de supervivencia de los receptores revela que tampoco existen diferencias entre los dos grupos [SPV del 98% y 96% a los 3 y 5 años en los primeros trasplantes frente a 97% a los 3 años y 5 años en los retrasplantados].CONCLUSIONES: No existen diferencias en la supervivencia del injerto ni en la de los receptores entre pacientes trasplantados por primera vez y aquellos que reciben un retrasplante(AU)

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of retransplantation in graft and recipient survival.METHODS: We carried out a retrospective study in 419 renal transplants and studied the influence of retransplantation in graft and patient survival.A homogeneity study was performed between the two groups with a Student`s T and a chi-square tests. Graft survival analysis was performed with Kaplan-Meyer and log rank tests.RESULTS: Of 419 transplants, 370 (88.3%) were first transplantations, 45(10.7%) second transplantations and 4(1%) third ones. Mean follow-up of the whole group was 72.5 months (+/-54.1 SD).There were no differences in follow-up between groups (Mean Follow-up 73.1 months +/-54.4 SD in first transplantations vs. 61.6 months +/-51.2 SD in repeat transplantation. p >0.05). The actuarial graft survival showed no differences between patients with first transplantation and those with a repeat one. [3 and 5-year SV of 89% (95% CI: 87-91%) and 84% (95% CI: 82-86%) Vs 88% (95% CI; 83-93%) and 85% (95% CI; 80-90%) respectively].After adjusting for all the heterogeneity variables we still did not find differences on graft survival.The actuarial recipient survival showed no differences between patients with first transplantation and those with a repeat one. [3 and 5 year SV of 98% and 96% Vs. 97%].CONCLUSIONS: There are no differences of graft and recipient survival between patients with a first transplantation and those with a repeat one(AU)

[Bladder leiomiosarcoma. A new case and a review of the literatura]. / Leiomiosarcoma vesical. Presentación de un nuevo caso y revisión de la literatura.

Bladder Leiomiosarcomas are exceptional mesenchimal tumours. Their differential diagnosis is basic to decide our therapeutic attitude. We present a new case of bladder leiomiosarcoma with a bad behavior and with multiple relapses, and perform a review of the literature in order to establish more properly the therapeutic attitudes.

Valor de la PET en la recurrencia del cáncer de próstata con PSA < 5 ng/ml / Usefulness of PET scans in diagnosing recurrent prostate cancer. Prostate with PSA level < 5 ng/ml

Introducción y objetivo: Evaluamos la utilidad de la tomografía por emisión de positrones (PET) en el diagnóstico de la recurrencia del cáncer de próstata tras tratamiento con intención curativa. Material y métodos: Se sometió a 92 pacientes consecutivos en progresión bioquímica tras cirugía radical (63) o radioterapia (29) a una PET. En todos los casos, se realizaron dos escáneres PET en el mismo día (11C-colina y 18F-FDG). Se evalúa la eficacia de la PET de manera global (utilizando los resultados con 11C-colina y 18F-FDG) y de manera independiente para detectar recurrencia en pacientes con progresión bioquímica. Para ello, se utilizan la comparación de medias para k muestras independientes, tablas de contingencia 2 × 2 y 2× X y curvas ROC. Resultados: 1. PET global: hay evidencia de la alteración de la PET en función del antígeno prostático específico (PSA) (p = 0,003), estadio clínico (p = 0,01). No existe una alteración de la PET estadísticamente significativa en función de la afectación de la biopsia (unilateral o bilateral), los márgenes quirúrgicos, el estadio patológico y el tiempo a progresión. La curva ROC PET-PSA es significativa (p < 0,0001) y permite calcular distintos puntos de corte; PSA = 4,3 ng/ml el que presenta una mayor especificidad (91%). 2. PET 18FDG: el área bajo la curva ROC es significativa (p < 0,0001), con una especificidad del 91% para un PSA =6,51 ng/ml. 3. PET 11colina: el área bajo la curva ROC es significativa (p < 0,0001), con una especificidad del 91% para un PSA = 5,15 ng/ml. Conclusiones: La PET es una herramienta útil en el diagnóstico de la recurrencia de cáncer de próstata tras tratamiento radical con intención curativa (AU)

Introduction and objectives: We intend to evaluate the usefulness of PET scans in diagnosing recurrent prostate cancer after a curative attempt using radical treatment. Material and methods: 92 consecutive prostate cancer patients in biochemical progression following radical surgery (63) or radiation treatment (29) were studied with positron emission tomography (PET). In all cases two scans were performed in the same day (11C-cholineand 18F-FDG). PET efficacy was evaluated both globally (by employing the results achieved with both 11C-choline and 18F-FDG) and using both radiotracers independently to detect recurrence in patients with biochemical progression. For this purpose, we used comparison of means for k-independent samples, 2 × 2 and 2 × X contingency tables and ROC curves. Results: 1. Global PET: there is evidence of PET alteration regarding the PSA level (P=0.003): the clinical stage (P=0.01). There are no statistically significant PET alterations regarding the affected biopsy (uni or bilateral), surgical margins, pathological stage and time to progression. ROC curve PET-PSA is statistically significant (P<0.0001) permitting calculation of different cut-off points, with a specificity of 91% (highest) for a PSA of 4.3 ng/ml. 2. PET18FDG: the area under the ROC curve is statistically significant (P<0.0001) with a specificity of91% for a PSA of 6.51 ng/ml. 3. PET 11choline: the area under the ROC curve is statistically significant (P<0.0001) with a specificity of 91% for a PSA of 5.15 ng/ml. Conclusions: PET is a useful tool for diagnosing prostate cancer recurrence after a curative attempt using radical treatment (AU)

Leiomiosarcoma vesical. Presentación de un nuevo caso y revisión de la literatura / Bladder leiomiosarcoma. A new case and a review of the literatura

Los leiomiosarcomas de vejiga son tumores mesenquimales excepcionales. Su diagnóstico diferencial con los leiomiomases fundamental para decidir nuestra actitud terapéutica. Presentamos un nuevo caso de leiomiosarcoma vesical con comportamiento agresivo que ha presentado múltiples recidivas, y realizamos una revisión de la literatura para establecerlas pautas terapéuticas más adecuadas (AU)

Bladder Leiomiosarcomas are exceptional mesenchimal tumours. Their differential diagnosis is basic to decide our therapeutic attitude. We present a new case of bladder leiomiosarcoma with a bad behavior and with multiple relapses, and perform a review of the literature in order to establish more properly the therapeutic attitudes (AU)