Expanding the cytological and architectural spectrum of mucoepidermoid carcinoma: The key to solving diagnostic problems in morphological variants.

Mucoepidermoid carcinoma (MEC) is the most common malignant salivary gland tumor. Varying sized cysts and sheets composed of three cell types (epidermoid, intermediate, and mucous cells) with varying degrees of atypia form the characteristic histological appearance of MEC. MEC frequently contains a wide variety of modified tumor cells and can be entirely cystic or completely solid. Under these circumstances, MEC requires critical differentiation from many mimickers, ranging from simple cysts and benign tumors to high-grade carcinomas. Tumor-associated lymphoid proliferation and sclerotic changes in the stroma also contribute to diagnostic difficulties. Several well-known diagnostically challenging variants (oncocytic, clear cell, spindle cell, and sclerosing) exist in MEC. With the advent of studies on specific CRTC1/3::MAML2 fusion genes in MEC, newly proposed subtypes have emerged, including Warthin-like and non-sebaceous lymphadenoma-like MECs. In addition to the recently defined mucoacinar variant with a serous cell phenotype, MEC devoid of squamous differentiation has also been reported, implying the need to reconsider this basic concept. In this article, we outline the general clinical features and MAML2 status of conventional MEC and review the cytoarchitectural subtypes, with an emphasis on a pitfall in the interpretation of this histologically diverse single entity.

Revisiting the History of Odontoma, with Special Reference to Its Original Illustration.

BACKGROUND: Practically every facet of the most common odontogenic tumor, odontoma, has been covered by an extensive volume of literature. However, uncertainty about its precise history has persisted. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The historical evolution of odontoma was traced with reference to the original illustrations that accompanied European and American reports published at the beginning of the 19th century and also at the turn of the century. RESULTS: The prevailing views regarding the first description of odontoma by Oudet of Paris in 1809 and the original designation "odontome" by Broca of Paris in 1867 are not entirely accurate. Before Broca's suggested term, "exostose dentaire" (dental exostosis) and "tumeur dentaire" (dental tumor) proposed by Oudet and Forget of Paris, respectively, were popular terms adopted in France, while in Briatin the terms "warty tooth" and "supernumerary teeth" proposed by Salter and Tomes of London, respectively, were widely coined. The original illustrations of complex odontoma were published by Wedl of Vienna in 1851, and in 1862 Tomes published the first drawing of compound odontoma denticles. Before the advent of diagnostic radiography in the early 1900s, spontaneous exposure or eruption of odontoma followed by secondary infection was very common. In 1887-1888, Bland Sutton of London criticized Broca's monumental research and formulated the first modern classification which, in essence, remains valid today. At that time, large osteomas of the maxilla were inappropriately classified as odontomas by many pathologists because of Bland Sutton's influential view. Interestingly, the first radiographic evidence of odontoma was published by the American oral surgeon Gilmer in 1899. CONCLUSION: In view of their fundamental achievements, the names of Wedl, Salter, Broca and Bland Sutton have been closely associated with the true history of odontoma.

Ghost cell odontogenic carcinoma arising in dentinogenic ghost cell tumor, peripheral: A case report.

Ghost cell odontogenic carcinoma (GCOC) is an extremely rare intraosseous malignant odontogenic tumor with prominent ghost cell keratinization and dentinoid formation. Here, we present the first case of GCOC arising in dentinogenic ghost cell tumor (DGCT), peripheral. The patient was a man in his 60s with an exophytic mass in the anterior part of lower gingiva. The resected tumor measured 4.5 cm in maximum diameter. Histologically, the nonencapsulated tumor proliferated in the gingiva without bone invasion. It was predominantly composed of ameloblastoma-like nests and islands of basaloid cells with ghost cells and dentinoid in the mature connective tissue, suggesting DGCT, peripheral. As minor components, sheets of atypical basaloid cells and ameloblastic carcinoma-like nests with pleomorphism and high proliferative activity (Ki-67 labeling index up to 40%) consistent with malignancy were identified. CTNNB1 mutation and ß-catenin nuclear translocation were observed in both benign and malignant components. Final diagnosis was GCOC arising in DGCT, peripheral. GCOC shows similar histological features to DGCT. In this unique case without invasion, the cytological atypia and high proliferative activity supports the diagnosis of malignant transformation from DGCT.

Porphyromonas gingivalis-odontogenic infection is the potential risk for progression of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis-related neoplastic nodule formation.

Porphyromonas gingivalis (P.g.), a major periodontal pathogen is a known risk factor for various systemic diseases. However, the relationship between P.g. and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH)-related hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is unclear. Thus, we aimed to elucidate whether P.g.-odontogenic infection promotes NASH-related HCC development/progression and to clarify its mechanism. Using high-fat diet (HFD)-induced NASH mouse model, P.g. was infected odontogenically. After 60 weeks of infection, tumor profiles were examined. Chow diet (CD) groups were also prepared at 60 weeks. Nodule formation was only seen in HFD-mice. P.g.-odontogenic infection significantly increased the mean nodule area (P = 0.0188) and tended to promote histological progression score after 60 weeks (P = 0.0956). Interestingly, P.g. was detected in the liver. HFD-P.g. (+) showed numerous TNF-α positive hepatic crown-like structures and 8-OHdG expression in the non-neoplastic liver. In P.g.-infected hepatocytes, phosphorylation of integrin ß1 signaling molecules (FAK/ERK/AKT) was upregulated in vitro. In fact, total AKT in the liver of HFD-P.g. (+) was higher than that of HFD-P.g. (-). P.g.-infected hepatocytes showed increased cell proliferation and migration, and decreased doxorubicin-mediated apoptosis. Integrin ß1 knockdown inhibited these phenotypic changes. P.g.-odontogenic infection may promote the progression of neoplastic nodule formation in an HFD-induced NASH mouse model via integrin signaling and TNF-α induced oxidative DNA damage.

Warthin Tumor of the Parotid Gland: The History of an Eponym.

The eponymous history of Warthin tumor (WT) is a fascinating issue in the field of salivary gland pathology. The late decades of the nineteenth century and the turn of the century saw notable German and French contributions on WT. Especially, the seminal 1910 paper of Albrecht and Arzt of Vienna is the foundation for the current knowledge of WT. It is generally believed that prior to this pioneering study, Hildebrand of Göttingen accurately described the lesion of WT in 1895. However, the historical origins of WT appear to be unsettled, and only a few German pathologists and surgeons are aware that dating back to 1885, the first recognizable reference to WT was that by the renowned German-Swiss pathologist Zahn, whose name is eponymously associated with "Zahn infarct" and "lines of Zahn". Two noted French surgeons with a major interest in pathology, Albarrán in 1885 and Lecéne in 1908, did not contribute to the topic. Since the 1950s, a mostly American group of pathologists and surgeons gradually adopted the term WT to replace the very accurate histologic descriptor "papillary cystadenoma lymphomatosum" coined by Warthin himself in 1929. It is our opinion that from a historical viewpoint, there is no particular reason why this tumor should have been named WT.

A Third Supernumerary Tooth Occurring in the Same Region: A Case Report.

The presence of a supernumerary tooth is one of the most common dental anomalies, and surgical treatment is often required to address this anomaly. Moreover, it may lead to malocclusion, and long-term follow-up is important to monitor its status. A 4-year-and-11-month-old boy was referred to our hospital for dental caries treatment. At 5 years and 5 months of age, a radiographic examination showed a supernumerary tooth (first supernumerary tooth) near the permanent maxillary left central incisor, and it was extracted 6 months later. Eighteen months after the extraction of the first supernumerary tooth, a new supernumerary tooth (second supernumerary tooth) was detected in the same region, which was extracted when the patient was aged seven years and seven months. Seven months later, another supernumerary tooth (third supernumerary tooth) was detected and extracted immediately. However, the permanent maxillary left central incisor did not erupt spontaneously even after 6 months. Therefore, surgical exposure was performed, and the central incisor erupted into the oral cavity. This report describes our experience with this patient with three metachronous supernumerary teeth and their management until the eruption of the permanent tooth. This report highlights the importance of long-term follow-up after supernumerary tooth extraction until the permanent teeth in that region have erupted completely.