RESUMO
Introduction: A systematic review of the literature on the donor site morbidity in patients undergoing Maxillofacial reconstruction was performed. The two widely used flaps namely free fibula flap (FFF) and DCIA flap were compared to answer the following questions: (1) Is donor site morbidity significantly different in patients undergoing maxillofacial reconstruction with FFF and DCIA flap? (2) Should donor site morbidity be considered as the criteria for choosing the flap for reconstruction. Materials and methods: The search strategy was based on PRISMA guidelines. Various electronic databases were searched. On reviewing the seven articles included in our systematic review, we found out oral squamous cell carcinoma to be the most common pathology leading to the defects in head and neck region requiring reconstruction with free flaps. Results: A total of 531 participants were investigated who underwent maxillofacial reconstruction using FFF and DCIA flap. The study included both the genders. The participants were assessed for short- and long-term donor site morbidity after the microvascular surgery. Mean age is 45-60 years. Three out of seven studies showed DCIA to have lesser complications at donor site than fibula group. While other two studies proved FFF to be better than DCIA. One study proved low donor site morbidity with regard to both the flap. Conclusion: The free fibula being the flap of choice in head and neck reconstruction has a comparable donor site morbidity to DCIA. The advantages of the iliac artery flap include natural curvature, abundant vertical and horizontal bone height for bone contouring and osseointegration, hidden scar, low incidence of wound healing problems and minimal effect on function and quality of life at long-term follow-up. Thus, it makes it the free flap of choice that one cannot avoid. This systematic review was registered at PROSPERO (CRD42021268949).
RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Tumours of salivary glands are rare and have various histo-pathological subtypes. Myoepitheliomas were first classified by Sheldon et al. and the criterion to classify or diagnose it was first defined by Barnes et al. and Sciubba and Brannon. Myoepithelioma accounts for less than 1 % of all salivary gland tumours, 40 % of these tumours occur in the parotid gland while 21 % occur in the minor salivary glands. A case of myoepithelioma of a minor salivary gland of the cheek is described, emphasizing the problems of the differential diagnosis. PRESENTATION OF THE CASE: A 40-year-old female reported to the department with a complaint of a cheek bite on her right side for a few months. The physical examination showed a presence of lobulated whitish mucosa on the right buccal mucosa at the level of the occlusal plane, on palpation it revealed a non-painful mass approximately 1.5 cm in radius, mobile to bimanual palpation. An excisional biopsy was performed under local anaesthesia. Microscopic and immunohistochemistry confirmed the tumour to be a myoepithelioma of a minor salivary gland with the absence of definitive features of malignancy. DISCUSSION: Due to their infrequency and multiplicity of histopathology, myoepitheliomas present difficulties in diagnosis. Cellular varieties can be misdiagnosed as malignancies. A key to determining diagnostic criteria for myoepitheliomas is to study cellular morphology, cytoplasmic filament expression, and ultrastructural features of the tumour and apply this information to defining myoepitheliomas. CONCLUSION: Myoepitheliomas are rare tumours, utilization of immunohistochemical staining and electron microscopy are useful tools for the diagnosis of myoepitheliomas to ensure proper treatment and follow-up.
RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Autotransplantation technique involves extraction of tooth from the recipient site and donor tooth without damage, placing and stabilizing donor tooth within same individual. The use of autogenous bone combined with platelet rich fibrin (PRF) and platelet rich plasma (PRP) seems to be favorable to achieve stable alveolar bone. Thus we provide an innovative adjuvant method for enhancing bone formation using PRF and inter-radicular bone with PRP as autogenous graft. PRESENTATION OF CASE: A 26 year old healthy female individual reported university teaching hospital to outpatient department of oral and maxillofacial surgery, with complain of decayed tooth. On clinical and radiographic examination it was diagnosed was chronic irreversible pulpitis with to left maxillary first molar. Looking at clinical profile, age and health status an autogenous tooth transplant was advised. DISCUSSION: Periodontal ligament, interradicular bone autografts, PRF and PRP has potential to induce formation of alveolar bone and is recommended in cases of atrophy of alveolar process. CONCLUSION: The solution mentioned can be hypothesized to improve - quantity and quality of bone formed, reduce the chances of ankylosis of the tooth, bone loss, sinus perforation.
