Leptin, Ghrelin, and Leptin/Ghrelin Ratio in Critically Ill Patients.

The objective of this study was to evaluate leptin, ghrelin, and leptin/ghrelin ratio in critically ill patients and association of leptin/ghrelin ratio with outcomes. This is a sub-study of the PermiT trial (ISRCTN68144998). A subset of 72 patients who were expected to stay >14 days in the Intensive care unit were enrolled. Blood samples were collected on days 1, 3, 5, 7, and 14. Samples were analyzed for leptin and active ghrelin in addition to other hormones. Baseline leptin/ghrelin ratio was calculated, and patients were stratified into low and high leptin/ghrelin ratio based on the median value of 236. There was a considerable variation in baseline leptin level: Median 5.22 ng/mL (Q1, Q3: 1.26, 17.60). Ghrelin level was generally low: 10.61 pg/mL (Q1, Q3: 8.62, 25.36). Patients with high leptin/ghrelin ratio compared to patients with low leptin/ghrelin ratio were older, had higher body mass index and more likely to be diabetic. There were no differences in leptin/ghrelin ratio between patients who received permissive underfeeding and standard feeding. Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that age and body mass index were significant independent predictors of high leptin-ghrelin ratio. Leptin-ghrelin ratio was not associated with 90-day mortality or other outcomes. Age and body mass index are predictors of high leptin/ghrelin ratio. Leptin/ghrelin ratio is not affected by permissive underfeeding and is not associated with mortality.

Free Fatty Acids' Level and Nutrition in Critically Ill Patients and Association with Outcomes: A Prospective Sub-Study of PermiT Trial.

OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study were to evaluate the clinical and nutritional correlates of high free fatty acids (FFAs) level in critically ill patients and the association with outcomes, and to study the effect of short-term caloric restriction (permissive underfeeding) on FFAs level during critical illness. PATIENTS/METHOD: In this pre-planned sub-study of the PermiT (Permissive Underfeeding vs. Target Enteral Feeding in Adult Critically Ill Patients) trial, we included critically ill patients who were expected to stay for ≥14 days in the intensive care unit. We measured FFAs level on day 1, 3, 5, 7, and 14 of enrollment. Of 70 enrolled patients, 23 (32.8%) patients had high FFAs level (baseline FFAs level >0.45 mmol/L in females and >0.6 mmol/L in males). RESULTS: Patients with high FFAs level were significantly older and more likely to be females and diabetics and they had lower ratio of partial pressure of oxygen to the fraction of inspired oxygen, higher creatinine, and higher total cholesterol levels than those with normal FFAs level. During the study period, patients with high FFAs level had higher blood glucose and required more insulin. On multivariable logistic regression analysis, the predictors of high baseline FFAs level were diabetes (adjusted odds ratio (aOR): 5.36; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.56, 18.43, p = 0.008) and baseline cholesterol level (aOR, 4.29; 95% CI: 11.64, 11.19, p = 0.003). Serial levels of FFAs did not differ with time between permissive underfeeding and standard feeding groups. FFAs level was not associated with 90-day mortality (aOR: 0.49; 95% CI: 0.09, 2.60, p = 0.40). CONCLUSION: We conclude that high FFAs level in critically ill patients is associated with features of metabolic syndrome and is not affected by short-term permissive underfeeding.

Oxidative stress, caloric intake and outcomes of critically ill patients.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to investigate the patterns of oxidative stress in critically ill patients and the association with caloric intake and outcomes. METHODS: In this pre-planned sub-study of the PermiT (Permissive Underfeeding versus Target Enteral Feeding in Adult Critically Ill Patients Trial- ISRCTN68144998), we included patients expected to stay in the ICU for ≥14 days. Serum samples were collected on days 1, 3, 5, 7 and 14 of enrollment. We measured total anti-oxidant capacity (TAC), protein carbonyl concentration (a measure of protein oxidation) and 8-hydroxy-7,8-dihydro-2'-deoxyguanosine (8-OHdG) (a measure of DNA oxidation). We used principal component analysis (PCA) and hierarchical cluster analysis (HCA) to group patients according to oxidative stress. RESULTS: Principal component analysis identified 2 components that were responsible for 79% of the total variance, and cluster analysis grouped patients in three statistically distinct clusters. Majority of patients 78.6% (44/55) were included in cluster 1 with lowest TAC, protein carbonyl and 8-OHdG levels and cluster 2 which accounted for 16.1% (9/55) of patients had the highest levels of TAC and intermediate levels of protein carbonyl levels. Cluster 3 patients 5.4% (3/56) had the highest protein carbonyl levels. Incident renal replacement therapy was highest in cluster 2 (4/8, 50.0%), compared to cluster 1 (4/42, 9.5%) and cluster 3 (1/3, 33.3%, p 0.01). When adjusted to oxidative stress cluster membership, permissive underfeeding was not associated with 90-day mortality (adjusted odds ratio, aOR 1.37, 95% CI 0.36, 5.25, p 0.64) but was associated significantly with lower incident renal replacement therapy (aOR 0.02, 95% CI < 0.001, 0.57, p 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: There are different distinct patterns of oxidative stress in critically ill patients. Incident renal replacement therapy was different among the three clusters. Our data suggest a protective effect of permissive underfeeding on incident renal replacement therapy that may differ by clusters of oxidative stress.

Caloric intake and the fat-to-carbohydrate ratio in hypercapnic acute respiratory failure: Post-hoc analysis of the PermiT trial.

BACKGROUND: The effect of moderate caloric enteral intake in critically ill patients with hypercapnic acute respiratory failure (HCARF) is unclear. We studied the impact of permissive underfeeding (PUF) compared with standard feeding (SF) on various HCARF outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The PermiT trial randomized 894 patients to either PUF (40-60% caloric requirement) or SF (70-100% requirement) with similar protein intake and found no difference in mortality, mechanical ventilation (MV) duration and ventilator-free days. In this post-hoc study, we restricted analysis to mechanically-ventilated patients with HCARF (PaCO2 >45 mmHg on the first two study days) and assessed the impact of trial interventions and fat-to-carbohydrate ratio on outcomes. RESULTS: One-hundred-twenty patients had HCARF (59 PUF and 61 SF, age 53.7 ± 17.8 years, body mass index 31.1 ± 11.2 kg/m2, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score 21.7 ± 7.1 and day-1 PaCO2 61 ± 16 mmHg). Caloric intake was 815 ± 270 kcal/day in PUF group and 1289 ± 407 kcal/day in SF group. The two groups had similar PaCO2 levels during ICU stay. The 90-day mortality (33.9% versus 35.6%, p = 0.85), MV duration (10.7 ± 6.8 versus 11.1 ± 8.1 days, p = 0.56) and ventilator-free days (52.9 ± 38.6 versus 51.2 ± 38.0 days, p = 0.80) were also similar in PUF and SF groups, respectively. Ventilator-free days and 90-day mortality were similar when the fat-to-carbohydrate ratio was < or ≥ the median value (0.73) in all patients and in PUF and SF groups. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with HCARF, SF and PUF were associated with similar PaCO2, MV duration, ventilator-free days and mortality. Fat-to-carbohydrate ratio was not associated with mortality or ventilator-free days. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN Registry: ISRCTN68144998.

Permissive underfeeding, cytokine profiles and outcomes in critically ill patients.

BACKGROUND: During critical illness in humans, the effects of caloric restriction on the inflammatory response are not well understood. The aim of this study is to examine the associations of caloric restriction, inflammatory response profiles and outcomes in critically ill patients. METHODS: This is a sub-study of the PermiT trial (Permissive Underfeeding or Standard Enteral Feeding in Critically Ill Adults Trial- ISRCTN68144998). Serum samples were collected on study days 1, 3, 5, 7 and 14 and analyzed for a panel of 29 cytokines. We used principal component analysis to convert possibly correlated variables (cytokine levels) into a limited number of linearly uncorrelated variables (principal components). We constructed repeated measures mixed linear models to assess whether permissive underfeeding compared to standard feeding was associated with difference cytokine levels over time. RESULTS: A total of 72 critically ill patients were enrolled in this study (permissive underfeeding n = 36 and standard feeding n = 36). Principal component analysis identified 6 components that were responsible for 78% of the total variance. When adjusted to principal components, permissive underfeeding was not associated with 90-day mortality (adjusted odds ratio 1.75, 95% confidence interval 0.44, 6.95, p = 0.43) or with incident renal replacement therapy. The cytokines did not differ with time between permissive underfeeding and standard feeding groups. CONCLUSIONS: The association of permissive underfeeding compared to standard feeding with mortality was not influenced by the inflammatory profile. Permissive underfeeding compared to standard feeding was not associated with differences in the serum levels of cytokines in critically ill patients.