Management of duodenal trauma: A retrospective review from the Panamerican Trauma Society.

INTRODUCTION: The operative management of duodenal trauma remains controversial. Our hypothesis is that a simplified operative approach could lead to better outcomes. METHODS: We conducted an international multicenter study, involving 13 centers. We performed a retrospective review from January 2007 to December of 2016. Data on demographics, mechanism of trauma, blood loss, operative time, and associated injured organs were collected. Outcomes included postoperative intra-abdominal sepsis, leak, need for unplanned surgery, length of stay, renal failure, and mortality. We used the Research Electronic Data Capture tool to store the data. Poisson regression using a backward selection method was used to identify independent predictors of mortality. RESULTS: We collected data of 372 patients with duodenal injuries. Although the duodenal trauma was complex (median Injury Severity Score [ISS], 18 [interquartile range, 2-3]; Abbreviated Injury Scale, 3.5 [3-4]; American Association for the Surgery of Trauma grade, 3 [2-3]), primary repair alone was the most common type of operative management (80%, n = 299). Overall mortality was 24%. On univariate analysis, mortality was associated with male gender, lower admission systolic blood pressure, need for transfusion before operative repair, higher intraoperative blood loss, longer operative time, renal failure requiring renal replacement therapy, higher ISS, and associated pancreatic injury. Poisson regression showed higher ISS, associated pancreatic injury, postoperative renal failure requiring renal replacement therapy, the need for preoperative transfusion, and male gender remained significant predictors of mortality. Duodenal suture line leak was statistically significantly lower, and patients had primary repair over every American Association for the Surgery of Trauma grade of injury. CONCLUSIONS: The need for transfusion prior to the operating room, associated pancreatic injuries, and postoperative renal failure are predictors of mortality for patients with duodenal injuries. Primary repair alone is a common and safe operative repair even for complex injuries when feasible. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic study, level IV.

Intraoperative combination of resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta and a median sternotomy in hemodynamically unstable patients with penetrating chest trauma: Is this feasible?

BACKGROUND: Recent evidence suggests that resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) is an effective life-saving intervention in patients with severe torso trauma. However, the deployment of REBOA in patients with isolated penetrating intrathoracic injuries remains controversial. We propose that a median sternotomy be performed in conjunction with REBOA as a feasible and effective means of hemorrhage control in patients suffering from penetrating chest trauma who present hemodynamically unstable. The objective of our study was to present our initial experience with this approach. METHODS: A prospectively collected case series of the use of REBOA (10 Fr) in conjunction with a median sternotomy from January 2015 to December 2016 at a Level I Trauma Center. We included hemodynamically unstable non-compressible torso hemorrhage patients with penetrating chest trauma who underwent intraoperative REBOA deployment plus median sternotomy. RESULTS: A total of 68 trauma-related emergent thoracic surgeries were performed at our institution during the study period. Of these, seven suffered from penetrating chest trauma and non-compressible torso hemorrhage and underwent REBOA plus median sternotomy. Six out of the seven patients suffered intrathoracic vascular injuries: two subclavian arteries, two internal mammary arteries, two aortic arch, and five major central venous injuries. Four patients had an associated lung injury with AIS >3, of which two suffered a pulmonary hilar vessel disruption. REBOA-related complications included one case of upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Six out of the seven patients survived the 30-day follow-up. No adverse neurologic outcomes or deficits were observed in survivors. CONCLUSION: The combined use of REBOA and median sternotomy could be a feasible and effective alternative to hemorrhage control in patients with non-compressible torso hemorrhage secondary to penetrating chest trauma. These findings challenge the recommendation against the use of REBOA in penetrating intrathoracic injuries. Future studies with stronger designs and larger sample sizes are required to confirm our results. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, level V.

An Intelligent Ecosystem for Providing Support in Prehospital Trauma Care in Cuenca, Ecuador.

According to facts given by the World Health Organization, one in ten deaths worldwide is due to an external cause of injury. In the field of pre-hospital trauma care, adequate and timely treatment in the golden period can impact the survival of a patient. The aim of this paper is to show the design of a complete ecosystem proposed to support the evaluation and treatment of trauma victims, using standard tools and vocabulary such as OpenEHR, as well as mobile systems and expert systems to support decision-making. Preliminary results of the developed applications are presented, as well as trauma-related data from the city of Cuenca, Ecuador.