Implementación de un programa de cribado del malestar emocional en un servicio de cirugía torácica / Implementing a distress screening program in a thoracic surgery service

Introducción: El objetivo del presente estudio es examinar la precisión diagnóstica de los test de cribado utilizados para detectar la necesidad de atención psicológica en pacientes remitidos para cirugía torácica. Métodos: Se evaluó la presencia de malestar emocional en un total de 105 pacientes remitidos para cirugía torácica por medio de la entrevista clínica psicológica (variable criterio). Los métodos de cribado utilizados fueron: el juicio del médico (sí/no), la Escala Hospitalaria de Ansiedad y Depresión (HADS), la pregunta única para evaluar depresión "¿se siente usted deprimido?" (ADEP) (1-5) y la pregunta única para medir ansiedad "¿se siente ansioso?" (AANA) (1-5). Resultados: De acuerdo con la entrevista entrevista clínica psicológica, el 34% de los pacientes fueron casos clínicos que requerían intervención psicológica. La puntuación total de la escala HADS (punto de corte 10) mostró una sensibilidad del 0,89, especificidad del 0,75 y un ABC de 0,883; la ADEP (punto de corte 1) mostró una sensibilidad del 0,79, especificidad del 0,74 y ABC del 0,795; la AANS (>1) obtuvo una sensibilidad del 0,78, especificidad del 0,41 y ABC de 0,69 y el juicio del médico mostró una sensibilidad del 0,47 y especificidad del 0,86. Conclusiones: Un alto porcentaje de pacientes remitidos para cirugía torácica requirieron intervención psicológica. El mejor instrumento para identificar a aquellos pacientes con necesidades psicológicas, tomando la entrevista psicológica como variable criterio, fue la puntuación total del HADS. Este instrumento es simple y breve, bien aceptado por los pacientes, de fácil aplicación en un servicio de cirugía torácica y tiene buena capacidad diagnóstica

Introduction: The aim of the present study was to examine the diagnostic accuracy of screening tests in detecting cases requiring psychological intervention among patients referred for thoracic surgery. Methods: Emotional distress was evaluated in 105 patients referred for thoracic surgery by means of a diagnostic psychological interview (criterion variable). The screening ability of the following methods was analyzed: the physician's opinion (Yes/No), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), single-item interview: «Are you depressed?» (Depression Question, ADEP) (1-5) and the single-item interview: «Are you anxious?» (Anxiety Question, ANXQ) (1-5). Results: According to the clinical interview, 34% of the patients were clinical cases requiring psychological intervention. The total HADS (cut-off point of 10) showed a sensitivity = 0.89, specificity = 0.75 and AUC = 0.883; the ADEP scale (>1) showed a sensitivity = 0.79, specificity = 0.74 and AUC = 0.795; the ANXQ scale (>1) showed a sensitivity = 0.78, specificity = 0.41 and AUC = 0.690; and the physician's opinion showed a sensitivity = 0.47 and specificity = 0.86. Conclusions: A high percentage of patients referred for thoracic surgery required psychological intervention. The best instrument to identify those patients requiring psychological care, taking a psychological interview as the criterion variable, was the total HADS score. This test is brief, simple and well accepted by patients; it is easy to implement within a thoracic surgery service and has a good diagnostic accuracy

Implementing a distress screening program in a thoracic surgery service. / Implementación de un programa de cribado del malestar emocional en un servicio de cirugía torácica.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of the present study was to examine the diagnostic accuracy of screening tests in detecting cases requiring psychological intervention among patients referred for thoracic surgery. METHODS: Emotional distress was evaluated in 105 patients referred for thoracic surgery by means of a diagnostic psychological interview (criterion variable). The screening ability of the following methods was analyzed: the physician's opinion (Yes/No), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), single-item interview: «Are you depressed?¼ (Depression Question, ADEP) (1-5) and the single-item interview: «Are you anxious?¼ (Anxiety Question, ANXQ) (1-5). RESULTS: According to the clinical interview, 34% of the patients were clinical cases requiring psychological intervention. The total HADS (cut-off point of 10) showed a sensitivity=0.89, specificity=0.75 and AUC=0.883; the ADEP scale (>1) showed a sensitivity=0.79, specificity=0.74 and AUC=0.795; the ANXQ scale (>1) showed a sensitivity=0.78, specificity=0.41 and AUC=0.690; and the physician's opinion showed a sensitivity=0.47 and specificity=0.86. CONCLUSIONS: A high percentage of patients referred for thoracic surgery required psychological intervention. The best instrument to identify those patients requiring psychological care, taking a psychological interview as the criterion variable, was the total HADS score. This test is brief, simple and well accepted by patients; it is easy to implement within a thoracic surgery service and has a good diagnostic accuracy.