Controversy in the classification of appendicitis and utilization of postoperative antibiotics.

BACKGROUND: There is wide variability and considerable controversy regarding the classification of appendicitis and the need for postoperative antibiotics. This study aimed to assess interrater agreement with respect to the classification of appendicitis and its influence on the use of postoperative antibiotics amongst surgeons and surgical trainees. METHODS: A survey comprising 15 intraoperative images captured during appendectomy was distributed to surgeons and surgical trainees. Participants were asked to classify severity of disease (normal, inflamed, purulent, gangrenous, perforated) and whether they would prescribe postoperative antibiotics. Statistical analysis included percent agreement, Krippendorff's alpha for interrater agreement, and logistic regression. RESULTS: In total, 562 respondents completed the survey: 206 surgical trainees, 217 adult surgeons, and 139 pediatric surgeons. For classification of appendicitis, the statistical interrater agreement was highest for categorization as gangrenous/perforated versus nongangrenous/nonperforated (Krippendorff's alpha = 0.73) and lowest for perforated versus nonperforated (Krippendorff's alpha = 0.45). Fourteen percent of survey respondents would administer postoperative antibiotics for an inflamed appendix, 44% for suppurative, 75% for gangrenous, and 97% for perforated appendicitis. Interrater agreement of postoperative antibiotic use was low (Krippendorff's alpha = 0.28). The only significant factor associated with postoperative antibiotic utilization was 16 or more years in practice. CONCLUSIONS: Surgeon agreement is poor with respect to both subjective appendicitis classification and objective utilization of postoperative antibiotics. This survey demonstrates that a large proportion (59%) of surgeons prescribe antibiotics after nongangrenous or nonperforated appendectomy, despite a lack of evidence basis for this practice. These findings highlight the need for further consensus to enable standardized research and avoid overtreatment with unnecessary antibiotics.

Population-based comparison of open vs laparoscopic esophagogastric fundoplication in children: application of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality pediatric quality indicators.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Increasing national focus on patient safety has promoted development of the pediatric quality indicators (PDIs), which screen for preventable events during provision of health care for children. Our objective is to apply these safety metrics to compare 2 surgical procedures in children, specifically laparoscopic and open esophagogastric fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux. METHODS: A retrospective analysis using 20 years of data from national representative state inpatient databases through the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project was conducted. Patients younger than 18 years with International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification, codes for open or laparoscopic esophagogastric fundoplication were included. Pediatric quality indicators were linked to each patient's profile. Demographics, comorbidities, outcomes, and 8 selected PDIs between open and laparoscopic fundoplications were compared using Pearson χ(2) tests and t tests. RESULTS: Of 33,533 patients identified, 28,141 underwent open and 5392 underwent laparoscopic fundoplication. Comorbidities occurred more frequently in open surgery. In-hospital mortality, length of stay, and hospital charges were less in laparoscopic surgery. Of the 8 PDIs evaluated, decubitus ulcer (P = .04) and postoperative sepsis (P = .003) had decreased rates with laparoscopic surgery compared with open. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux in children can be performed safely compared with the open approach with equivalent or improved rates of PDIs.

Benchmarking the quality of care of infants with low-risk gastroschisis using a novel risk stratification index.

BACKGROUND: The nationwide mortality of neonates with gastroschisis was compared to determine whether significant variations in outcome occurred at the hospital level. METHODS: Utilizing a previously developed risk-stratification index, low-risk neonates with gastroschisis were identified by a score of < or = 2. Only hospitals that had a record of treating >25 low-risk neonates were included in the analysis. Hospital performance in treating infants with gastroschisis was categorized into moderate and extreme outliers. RESULTS: A total of 4,344 neonates with gastroschisis were identified at 506 individual hospitals. Low-risk neonates had an overall mortality of 2.9% compared with high-risk neonates whose overall mortality was 24.4%. Forty hospitals treated >25 low-risk neonates in the years studied for a total of 1,775 low-risk patients. The mean, in-hospital mortality of this cohort was 3.1% (range, 0-14.3). Eight hospitals were moderate outliers with mortality rates between 3.8% and 8.0%. Two hospitals were extreme outliers with mortality rates of 8.6% and 14.3%. CONCLUSION: A substantial variation exists in the mortality of neonates with low-risk gastroschisis across hospitals. Further improvements in survival may, thus, depend on targeting quality improvement initiatives to standardization of operative approaches as well improvements in nonoperative factors such as neonatal intensive care unit practices, nurse-to-patient ratios, and levels of intensivist staffing.