First-World Care at Third-World Rates: Pakistan, an Attractive Destination for Bariatric Tourism.

Introduction Obesity, a complex and multifactorial disease, is defined by a body mass index (BMI) greater than 30 kg/m². When the BMI exceeds 40 kg/m², it is classified as morbid obesity. This condition leads to excessive fat accumulation, which impairs normal body function and metabolism. For individuals grappling with morbid obesity and those who have faced significant hurdles in their quest for substantial weight loss, bariatric surgery emerges as a vital option. Purpose The study aims to explore the dynamics of bariatric surgical tourism in Pakistan, shedding light on factors influencing the choice of Pakistan as a destination for bariatric tourism. Materials and methods A retrospective cross-sectional study design was adopted. Data were gathered from the medical records database, including all patients who had undergone bariatric surgery from 2018 until 2022. The data collection process involved comprehensive patient outreach, where investigators conducted phone interviews and collected patient satisfaction assessments. During these phone interviews, valuable information was gathered by posing questions. These inquiries encompassed various aspects, including the patient's overall satisfaction with the surgical experience, their countries of origin, the specific bariatric procedures they underwent, the motivating factors behind their decision to travel abroad for surgery, their postoperative follow-up routines, and any complications they may have encountered. Results One hundred and nine patients traveled to Pakistan for bariatric surgery from 2018 to 2022. Out of 109 patients, 78 responded to the questionnaire by phone or email. The proforma was filled by 41 (52.5%) males and 37 (47.5%) females. Forty-seven (60.2%) of these patients underwent Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and 31 (39.8%) patients underwent sleeve gastrectomy. Out of 78 bariatric patients, 72 (92.3%) were satisfied with their surgery, five patients (6.4%) were neutral in their response and one patient (1.3%) was dissatisfied with the surgery. Most of the patients (26, 33.3%) declared money as the main driving force for traveling, with long waiting times being the close second reason (19, 24.36%) patients. Conclusion At least 2% of worldwide bariatric procedures are provided for medical tourists. Countries such as Mexico, India, Lebanon, and Romania dominate as providers for patients mainly from the USA, UK, and Germany. The lack of affordable bariatric healthcare and long waiting lists are some of the reasons for patients choosing bariatric tourism. The 92.3% satisfaction rate of patients with the surgery and its outcomes is a significant finding, as it suggests that bariatric surgery services provided in Pakistan are meeting or exceeding the expectations of international patients. The exceptionally high level of patient satisfaction speaks to the quality of care provided by the medical institutions in Pakistan. The data and analysis presented in this study shed light on the motivations and experiences of international patients traveling to Pakistan for bariatric surgery. These insights are invaluable for healthcare providers, policymakers, and the medical tourism industry as they seek to enhance the accessibility, affordability, and quality of healthcare services for domestic and international patients.

Congenital absence of appendix: a rare condition that could result in severe complications-a review of literature.

Acute appendicitis is the most frequent cause of abdominal pain and acute emergency surgeries, with a mortality risk of 6-7% at its onset. Since atypical deviations in these structures are rare, they can lead to diagnosis confusion and increase the risk of a worsening of the patient's clinical picture. We present the case of a 35-year-old patient who had surgery after being diagnosed with acute appendicitis. Based on clinical assessment (Alvarado score 8), appendix agenesis was discovered intraoperatively and confirmed by postoperative pathology. Excess dissection while looking for the appendix caused an intraoperative complication of cecal damage, which was treated with a right hemicolectomy. Until now, just a few cases have been described in the literature. We record this case owing to its rarity and with the goal of further understanding the illness, which will lead to improved surgical results in similar patients.

The Efficacy of Conservative Management in Uncomplicated Acute Appendicitis - A Single-Center Retrospective Study.

Background Acute appendicitis remains the most common cause of lower abdominal pain leading to emergency visits. Even though the standard treatment of acute appendicitis remains appendectomy, in recent times, multiple randomized control trials and meta-analyses have deduced conservative treatment as a successful alternative treatment. During the coronavirus disease (COVID) pandemic, with a shortage of staff and resources, treatment with conservative management of uncomplicated acute appendicitis became very beneficial under certain circumstances and conditions. This study aimed to assess whether it is effective to manage patients with uncomplicated acute appendicitis with antibiotic therapy. Methodology This was a single hospital based retrospective, cross-sectional study from Jan 2015 to May 2020. Patients with clinical and radiological features of uncomplicated acute appendicitis with Alvarado's score >6 were included in the study. Patients were kept on antibiotics, intravenous fluids, and analgesia as part of a conservative regime. Those who failed to respond to conservative therapy were managed surgically. The follow-up period was six months. Results One hundred eighty-two cases of uncomplicated acute appendicitis were included and managed conservatively, of which 52.2% were males while 47.8% were females. The median age of the patients was 26 years. Conservative treatment was successful in 26.2% of the patients, with a recurrence of 5.5% in the six-month follow-up period. The mean number of days of hospital stay was three days in patients treated with conservative or surgical treatment. Conclusion Conservative management is gaining popularity, and many centers are inclined towards non-operative management; however, appendectomy remains the gold standard treatment for appendicitis.

Incidental low grade mucinous neoplasm of appendix in pregnancy: A case report & literature review.

INTRODUCTION: Mucinous neoplasms of appendix account for 0.2-0.4% of all the appendix specimens. The occurrence of this neoplasm in pregnancy is extremely rare. We describe a case of a pregnant lady who was diagnosed as acute appendicitis and found to have Low-Grade Mucinous neoplasm on histopathology. In the existent literature, there are only a few such cases reported and none from our Middle East region. CASE PRESENTATION: 42-year-old pregnant lady at 24 weeks of gestation presented with classical symptoms of acute appendicitis. She had leukocytosis but the Ultrasound was equivocal. She underwent laparoscopic appendectomy and found to have an inflamed appendix. Postoperative recovery was satisfactory and was discharged home. The histopathology report showed low-grade mucinous neoplasm of the appendix and she was detailed about it on follow up. DISCUSSION: The incidence of appendiceal neoplasm is rare in routine appendectomy and carcinoid is the most common tumor of the appendix. Low-Grade mucinous neoplasm is a rare entity and its presence in pregnancy is further rarer. CONCLUSION: Since this neoplasm does not manifest with a characteristic clinical profile it is difficult to diagnose, even with extensive preoperative evaluation. Although surgical treatment is straight forward, the management of the appendiceal neoplasm during pregnancy necessitates full knowledge of the natural history of the disease to attain equilibrium of concern for maternal survival and fetal health.