Continued sac perfusion of popliteal artery aneurysms after ligation and bypass. Relevance of duplex ultrasound surveillance and treatment.

AIM: Conventional management of popliteal artery aneurysms (PAA) through a medial approach may be lon term ineffective. We report our long term rate of continued sac perfusion after ligation and bypass, combined to duplex ultrasound (DUS) surveillance protocol. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Follow-up data of 24 PAA (mean diameter 37.5 ± 8.8 mm) treated by ligation and bypass with eventual adjunctive procedures (direct sac embolization or resection) were collected. The endpoints of the study were the long term rate of continued sac perfusion and the freedom from any reintervention. RESULTS: Twentyfour PAA were treated in 20 patients. Long term follow-up was complete for 19 graft (79.1%). During a median follow-up of 71.2 months (4-168), persistent sac flow was found in 5 legs (26.3%), 4 to 36 months after surgery, without enlargement or rupture. The cumulative Kaplan-Meier survival free from PAA reperfusion at 1, 3, and 6 years was 91.5%, 77.5%, and 71.5%, respectively. Basing on DUS surveillance, late additional procedures were required in 5 patients (25%), to treat sac reperfusion or preserve graft patency. The cumulative Kaplan-Meier survival free from any reintervention at 1, 3, and 6 years was 91.5%, 72.8%, and 67%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Conventional management of PAA through a medial approach may be associated to progressive sac expansion. The DUS surveillance protocol remains strongly recommended to detect sac perfusion and suggest the timing of reintervention before rupture occurs. Adjunctive intraoperative procedures could improve the long term results, but further studies on large series are needed. KEY WORDS: Acrylic glue, Duplex ultrasound study, Femoropopliteal bypass, Popliteal artery aneurysm, Ultrasoundguided embolization.

Surgical approach to the suprarenal abdominal aorta.

AIM: The surgical approach to the pararenal aorta can be performed through a midline laparotomy or retroperitoneal approach. The current paper reports the techniques for the suprarenal aortic approach, through the review of technical literature on this topic. METHODS: Forty-six out of 82 technical papers regarding the surgical approach to the suprarenal aorta were reviewed, focusing on relevant technical details, such as the position of patient, type of incision, aortic approach and anatomical limitations. RESULTS: The left retroperitoneal abdominal approach offers numerous advantages, mainly observing some modifications of the original technique (9th intercostal space incision, short radial frenotomy, section of the inferior mesenteric artery). The traditional transperitoneal access, through a midline or bilateral subcostal incision with retroperitoneal medial visceral rotation, is best indicated when an unrestricted approach to the right iliac arteries is needed, but it can be more challenging in patients with "hostile abdomen", for which a retroperitoneal route is probably more appropriate. A more aggressive surgical approach through a 7th-9th space thoracolaparotomy, combined with semicircunferential frenotomy, should be strongly recommended to provide a safe suprarenal aortic aneurysm repair in high risk patients, who often require adjunctive procedures, such as selective visceral perfusion and left heart bypass. CONCLUSIONS: Many technical options can be used to approach the suprarenal aorta, but none can be "radicalized". The surgical strategy must be individualized according to the anatomo-clinical characteristics of the patient and aneurysm morphology as well. KEY WORDS: Abdominal aorta, Aortic aneurysm, Surgical approach.

Giant Brachial Aneurysm after Arteriovenous Fistula Ligation: A Review of the Different Surgical Approaches.

The aim of this paper is to describe the case of a patient successfully treated for left brachial arterial aneurysm occurring 15 years after renal transplantation and consequent 8 years after arteriovenous fistula (AVF) ligation. We describe our experience and our surgical approach. A 45-year-old man presented to our attention for a large pulsatile formation on the volatile face of the left forearm, which he reported to have enlarged in the last year. He had a history of chronic renal impairment in 2000, then AVF for dialysis was realized, and he was finally addressed to kidney transplantation in 2004. In 2011 the AVF was ligated. We observed absence of radial pulse and direct flow on the ulnar artery; a large pulsatile formation was evident along the course of the left brachial artery, associated with forearm venous dilatation. Doppler ultrasound showed fusiform aneurysm of the brachial artery with 3.5 cm diameter and longitudinal extension of 5 cm up to the brachial bifurcation. We removed the brachial aneurysm, with a venous bypass on the ulnar artery. The patient was discharged in good general condition on the second postoperative day. At 1- and 6-month follow-up he had complete recovery with graft patency, without any neurological impairment and with a good esthetic result. An open surgical repair with great saphenous vein interposition seems to be the best choice in terms of patency and perioperative morbidity.

Endovenous Laser Ablation with 1,470-nm Diode with Tumescence Anesthesia and Saphenofemoral Ligation: Propensity Score Match Comparison.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study is to compare 2 groups of patients treated for great saphenous vein (GSV) reflux with open surgical saphenofemoral ligation (SFL) and endovenous laser ablation (EVLA). METHODS: Consecutive patients with primary unilateral GSV reflux undergoing EVLA treatment since 2014 were enrolled, and another series of patients treated with SFL was considered. The patients were stratified according to treatment and the results were compared using the propensity score (1:1). The covariables were age, gender, body mass index, CEAP (Clinical class, Etiology, Anatomy and Pathophysiology) staging, and GSV and saphenofemoral junction diameters. Primary outcomes were GSV occlusion or recurrent groin varicose veins at 1 year after treatment. Secondary outcomes included vein thrombosis, hyperpigmentation, paresthesia, postoperative pain, analgesic requirement, and ecchymosis assessed at discharge and CEAP stage and quality of life (QoL) assessment 1 month after surgery. RESULTS: A total of 123 patients were included in the study: 59 were treated with EVLA and 64 with SFL. At 12 months, we observed 10 recurrent groin varicose veins after SFL (15.6%) and 6 GSV recanalization after EVLA (10.2%, P = 0.369). Extra-saphenous recurrent varicose veins were observed in 36 patients (29.3%): 20 in the open group (31.2%) and 16 in EVLA group (27.1%, P = 0.615). After matching procedure 74 patients were analyzed (37 patients by group), logistic regression model showed that the risk of outcome was not associated with the surgical treatment (odds ratio 1.76, 95% confidence interval 0.52-6.01). CONCLUSIONS: Both techniques to treat saphenous impairment have demonstrated to be safe, with good results in terms of efficacy and symptomatic improvement at follow-up. EVLA with 1,470 nm seems to have lower rates of recurrence and good perceived QoL. Tumescent anesthesia is a good option with good results and may be extended to open surgical ligation.

Type III B endoleak leading to aortic rupture after endovascular repair: analysis of errors in follow up and treatment.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this paper is to describe the case of a patient with a type III endoleak which was misdiagnosed and treated without success as a type I-II endoleak. An incorrect endoleak diagnosis lead to aortic rupture, which could be avoided with a correct diagnosis. Type III B endoleaks presents some diagnostic difficulties, in the case we describe, they were increased by late presentation and poor follow up. CASE PRESENTATION: We revised this 89 years old patient history, he underwent EVAR 11 years before, a control scan six month after surgery, showed a type I-II endoleak which was still present after first intervention. He was treated with proximal cuff positioning and embolization coils. Eight years after first intervention, a Computed Tomography Angiography (CTA) showed persisting type I-II endoleak so same problem was suspected and patient was treated with another proximal cuff and right iliac extension. A Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) control, six months later, showed an increase of the aneurysm sac size of 12 mm. Two years later patient presented at emergency room at our hospital with malaise, sweating and abdominal pain. Computed Tomography (CT-scan) showed increased abdominal aortic diameter (140 × 130 mm) with rupture and hemoperitoneum. He was treated in urgent fashion with endograft removal and aortic-iliac Dacron graft reconstruction. During surgery three large tears on endograft fabric and a stent suture rupture were observed. After surgery patient was admitted in intensive care unit and died on second postoperative day due to multiorgan failure. CONCLUSIONS: Type III endoleak is an uncommon complication: a correct and prompt diagnosis is mandatory for appropriate treatment After EVAR, and especially in those cases of known endoleak, a correct follow-up is mandatory and in case of diagnostic doubts correct imaging should be performed. Media contrast allergies should not be neglected and should not represent a CTA limitation.