Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Assunto principal
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Saudi Pharm J ; 31(7): 1157-1166, 2023 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37287507

RESUMO

Background: Pharmacists provide medication counselling services to improve patient knowledge and their adherence to prescription instructions, and to achieve the best possible health-related outcomes. Our study aim was to describe the patterns of the reasons for referral to counselling and the subjects discussed between pharmacists and patients, and the possible associations related to the susceptible patient groups (chronic and elderly), in Saudi Ministry of Health (MOH) medication counselling clinics. Method: This was a descriptive cross-sectional study. An electronic data collection form was developed to document details about the medication counselling services that were provided to patients. The form consisted of three main areas: (1) patient demographics and counselling services characteristics; (2) reasons for referrals to the medication counselling clinics; and (3) the subjects that were discussed between pharmacists and patients in the counselling session. A comparison was conducted between chronic and non-chronic, and elderly and non-elderly patients. Results: From May 2020 to December 2021, a total of 36,672 counselling service sessions were provided to 28,998 patients. The greatest proportion of reasons for referrals to counselling was that patients had chronic diseases (50.84%), patients were added a new medication (33.69%) or patients received multiple medications (polypharmacy) (22.71%). The most frequent subject discussed during counselling was general knowledge about medication (85.62%), the duration of therapy (68.42%) and the action that patients should take if they missed a dose of their medication (44.51%). Patients with chronic diseases showed a significantly greater frequency of referral to counselling compared to patients without chronic disease, due to polypharmacy, medication use during Ramadhan, adverse drug reactions (ADRs), dosing/interactions, high-alert medication and suspected nonadherence (P < 0.001). This led to a significantly greater frequency of discussions with patients with chronic conditions about their general medication knowledge, the duration of their therapy, missed doses, ADRs, medication reconciliation and medication use during Ramadhan (P < 0.001). Elderly patients recorded significantly more referrals to counselling related to chronic diseases and polypharmacy than their younger counterparts (P < 0.001); however, there was no significant difference between the elderly and non-elderly in the patterns of subjects discussed that were related to polypharmacy and chronic disease consequences. A significant spike was also reported in the frequency of delivery of counselling services to caregivers for the elderly (P < 0.001). Conclusion: The current state of medication counselling services in Saudi MOH facilities indicates that chronic disease and polypharmacy are the most significant reasons for referral to counselling, and that the subjects discussed the most during counselling are general knowledge about medication, duration of therapy and missed doses. Patients with chronic diseases have a higher frequency of referral to counselling and discussion about polypharmacy and its consequences than those without chronic conditions. Elderly patients also show a high frequency of referral to counselling about chronic diseases and polypharmacy. Caregivers of elderly patients require more education to maximise counselling effectiveness as they attend the majority of elderly patient counselling sessions.

2.
Saudi Pharm J ; 23(4): 397-404, 2015 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27134541

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: The current study aimed to explore the knowledge, perception, and attitude of physicians toward generic medicines in Saudi Arabia. BACKGROUND: The local market of generic medicine share in Saudi Arabia is low compared to global and regional statistics. The reason for this low market share and the role of physicians has not previously been investigated. The purpose of this study was to assess health practitioner level of perceived knowledge, opinions and attitudes about local generic medication, and identify factors that influence infrequency of generic prescriptions. METHODS: A random sample of 231 physicians was recruited from two hospitals in Riyadh (one government one private) and 178 (77%) responded. Information on the physicians' perceived knowledge, opinions and attitude toward local generic medication was extracted, analyzed and interpreted. Factors that influence infrequent prescription of local generic drugs were identified. RESULTS: Among the 178 participants in the physicians' survey, 76% and 47% reported that they are knowledgeable about the terms "generic" and "bioequivalence" respectively, while 44% reported that they are able to explain bioequivalence to their patients. Approximately 52% of physicians reported that local generics should be substituted for brands if suitable for the case, and 21.9% reported that they believe SFDA approved local generics are therapeutically equivalent to their brands. Clinical effectiveness was reported by 71.9% of physicians as the most influential factor effecting prescription of brand over local generic medication. The three independent significant predictors for infrequent prescription of local generics among physicians: Government sector employment (OR = 3.74, [95%CI 1.50-9.43]), consultant level (OR = 3.94, [95%CI 1.50-10.31]) and low level of knowledge about local generics (OR = 4.11, [95%CI 1.56-10.84]). CONCLUSION: The low market share of local generics medicines attributed to low prescription rates is significantly more among senior-level physicians working in governmental hospitals. Low level of knowledge about generic drugs among physicians was the strongest predictive factor for low prescription. Future bigger studies are needed to confirm these results.

3.
Neurosciences (Riyadh) ; 19(4): 291-6, 2014 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25274588

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To assess the current state of knowledge on the epidemiology of autism in Arab Gulf countries, and identify gaps for future research. METHODS: PubMed and ScienceDirect databases were used to identify relevant articles published until the 3rd of April 2013 (date of search). The search was conducted using the electronic library of King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Studies were eligible for inclusion if they concerned the epidemiology of autism, conducted in any Arab Gulf country, and published in English. RESULTS: Twelve articles met the inclusion criteria. Studies showed a prevalence ranging from 1.4 to 29 per 10,000 persons. Identified risk factors were metabolic, autoimmune, and environmental in nature. The following determinants were found as possible contributing factors for autism: suboptimal breast-feeding, advanced maternal and paternal age, cesarean section, and prenatal complications. CONCLUSION: Only a few studies explored the epidemiology of autism in Arab Gulf countries and none have investigated the burden of the disease on the child, family, or society. More research is needed to better identify the burden and risk factors of autism in Gulf countries.


Assuntos
Transtorno Autístico , Humanos , Transtorno Autístico/epidemiologia , Biomarcadores , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Estudos Transversais , Previsões , Omã/epidemiologia , Prevalência , Fatores de Risco , Arábia Saudita/epidemiologia , Emirados Árabes Unidos/epidemiologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...