Local relapse of soft tissue sarcoma of the extremities or trunk wall operated on with wide margins without radiation therapy.

BACKGROUND: The quality of surgical margins is the most important factor affecting local control in soft tissue sarcoma (STS). Despite this, there is no universally accepted consensus on the definition of an adequate surgical margin or on which patients should be offered radiation therapy. This study focuses on local control and its prognostic factors in patients with trunk wall and extremity STS. METHODS: Adult patients with a final diagnosis of trunk wall or extremity STS referred to a single tertiary referral centre between August 1987 and December 2016 were identified from a prospective institutional database. Patients were treated according to a protocol instituted in 1987. The classification of surgical margins and indications for radiation therapy were based on anatomy and strict definition of surgical margins as metric distance to the resection border. Local treatment was defined as adequate if patients received either surgery with wide margins alone or marginal surgery combined with radiation therapy. Margins were considered wide if the tumour was excised with pathological margins greater than 2.5 cm or with an uninvolved natural anatomical barrier. After treatment, patients were followed up with local imaging and chest X-ray: 5 years for high-grade STS, 10 years for low-grade STS. RESULTS: A total of 812 patients were included with a median follow-up of 5.8 (range 0.5-19.5) years. Forty-four patients had a grade 1 tumour: there were no instances of recurrence in this group thus they were excluded from further analysis. Five-year local control in the 768 patients with grade 2-3 STS was 90.1 per cent in patients receiving adequate local treatment according to the protocol. Altogether, 333 patients (43.4 per cent) were treated with wide surgery alone and their 5-year local control rate was 91.1 per cent. Among patients treated with wide surgery alone, deep location was the only factor adversely associated with local relapse risk in multivariable analysis; 5-year local control was 95.3 per cent in superficial and 88.3 per cent in deep-sited sarcomas (hazards ratio 3.154 (95% c.i. 1.265 to 7.860), P = 0.014). CONCLUSION: A high local control rate is achievable with surgery alone for a substantial proportion of patients with STS of the extremities or superficial trunk wall.

Chondrosarcoma of the Chest Wall: A Single Institution Review of 50 Cases.

INTRODUCTION: Chondrosarcoma (CS) is most common primary osseous tumor of the chest wall. The aim of this study was to report results from surgical procedures and evaluate clinical factors predicting survival of patients with chest wall CSs treated in a single tertiary sarcoma center. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty patients with primary CS located in the ribs and sternum were included. Details of the clinical data and oncological outcomes, including local recurrence (LR) and disease-specific survival (DSS), were collected. RESULTS: The tumor was primarily originated in the sternum in 6 patients (12.5%) and in ribs 2 to 11 in the remaining patients. Specimens were histologically graded 1 in 13 patients (26%), 2 in 28 (56%), 3 in 8 (16%), and 1 (2%) as mesenchymal grade 3 CS. R0 margins were obtained in all cases. Reconstruction was warranted in 47 (94%) cases. Local recurrence developed in 3 (6%) patients, and the median time to LR was 17 (range, 16-68) months. Eight (16%) patients developed metastasis. Increasing tumor volume was a statistically significant factor for reduction of DSS. CONCLUSIONS: Chondrosarcoma of the chest wall can be treated effectively with clear margins, resulting in lower LR rate and higher DSS than CS of the extremities and pelvis. Metastasis of the chest wall mostly occurs in high-grade tumors, and the locations of the metastases differ greatly from those observed in CS of the extremities and pelvis. Metastases are commonly extrapulmonary, indicating the need for postoperative follow-up with multiple imaging modalities to monitor recurrence and metastases.

Experience of a single center in the treatment of rare malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors during the years 1991-2021.

Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor (MPNST) is a rare sarcoma with a poor prognosis, as the aggressive types of this cancer tend to grow rapidly and metastasize frequently. MPNST is associated with neurofibromatosis type 1 gene mutation. The minority of cases arise secondary to radiation therapy or sporadically. The primary treatment for MPNST is early surgical resection of the tumor. The aim of this study was to retrospectively evaluate the outcome of the treatment of MPNST in Helsinki University Hospital from the years 1991 to 2021. Fourteen MPNST cases were evaluated in this study retrospectively. Descriptive statistical analysis was performed on the collected patient data. Marginal resection was completed in nine cases, wide margins were achieved in three cases, and in two cases the final histological examination of the specimen revealed intralesional removal. During the follow-up time of 36.7 ± 12.1 months, all patients who underwent wide margin resection were alive. One patient died 22 months after intralesional resection and six within 38.3 ± 30.9 months of marginal resection. Seventy-one percent of tumor surgeries resulted in Clavien-Dindo class 3b complications, reflecting the complexity of the surgeries. The aggressive nature of MPNST and the large size of these tumors requires extensive surgery, which can lead to complications. The prognosis of MPNST needs improvement.

Reconstruction of the superficial femoral vessels with muscle flap coverage for soft tissue sarcomas of the proximal thigh.

BACKGROUND: Surgical resection of soft tissue sarcoma with a margin of healthy tissue may necessitate resection and reconstruction of major blood vessels together with soft tissues of the proximal thigh to preserve the limb. The long-term functional outcomes of these reconstructions remain unestablished. The aim of this report was to assess the vascular and functional outcomes of soft tissue sarcoma patients with femoral vessel reconstructions. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients who had undergone oncovascular reconstruction during the treatment of proximal thigh soft tissue sarcoma in 2014-2020 were reviewed for details of the vascular and soft tissue reconstructions, and the oncological and functional outcomes. This included eight patients of a median age 59 (range 19-77) years. All had a reconstruction of at least the superficial femoral artery and vein as well as soft tissue reconstruction with a muscle flap. All vessel reconstructions were done with either autologous vein (six grafts/four patients) or allograft (10 grafts/six patients). A microvascular latissimus dorsi flap, with a skin island, was incorporated to cover the vascular grafts in five patients. A pedicled sartorius or gracilis muscle flap was used to fill the defect in three patients. RESULTS: Graft patency was assessed in seven patients with a median follow-up of 48 (1-76) months. The arterial graft was patent in 6/8 and the vein graft in 2/8 patients. The gait had returned to normal in five of the six patients assessed. The median MTSS was 70 (43-87)% and the TESS 90 (75-100)%. No local recurrence of the sarcoma was detected. CONCLUSIONS: Vascular reconstruction combined with soft tissue reconstruction enables limb-sparing surgery in patients with soft tissue sarcoma involving proximal femoral vessels. Although the surgeries are complex with high early morbidity, the achieved long-term functional outcomes are worthwhile.

Radiation-associated angiosarcoma of the breast: analysis of diagnostic tools in a registry-based population.

BACKGROUND: Radiation-associated angiosarcoma of the breast (RAASB) is a serious late consequence caused by breast cancer treatment. Initial symptoms are often inconspicuous, thus contributing to diagnostic delay. Most previous studies of the diagnostic aspects of RAASB are case reports. PURPOSE: To perform a complete review of the imaging findings and biopsy methods in a nationwide RAASB cohort. MATERIAL AND METHODS: RAASB patients were identified from a national cancer registry and additional patients were included from our hospital. All available information from imaging (mammogram [MGR], ultrasound [US], magnetic resonance imaging [MRI], and computed tomography [CT]) and biopsies was reviewed. The sensitivity of imaging and biopsy methods for detection of RAASB was calculated. RESULTS: Fifty-eight patients with RAASB were found. Fourteen MGR, 30 US, 24 MRI, and 25 CT studies were available for evaluation. The sensitivity of MGR, US, MRI, and CT for detection of RAASB was 43%, 50%, 92%, and 84%, respectively. Superior sensitivity was demonstrated for punch biopsy (84%) and incisional biopsy (93%) compared to fine-needle aspiration cytology (0%) and core needle biopsy (18%). CONCLUSION: MRI and CT have comparable sensitivity for detection of RAASB, while MGR and US are unreliable. However, negative findings in MRI or CT must be interpreted with caution. Punch biopsy and incisional biopsy are the preferred biopsy methods.

Single-Institution, Multidisciplinary Experience of Soft Tissue Sarcomas in the Chest Wall.

INTRODUCTION: We report our single-institution, multidisciplinary experience of nearly 20 years of working on chest wall soft tissue sarcoma cases. The aim of this study was to evaluate clinical outcomes in patients with chest wall soft tissue sarcoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of 49 surgically treated patients with chest wall soft tissue sarcoma was conducted from 1997 to 2015. RESULTS: The median age of the patients was 57.0 years. There were 19 full-thickness and 30 partial-thickness resections. Reconstruction was warranted in 37 cases. Sarcomas were high grade in 31 (63.3%) and low grade in 18 (36.7%) cases. Local recurrence developed in 8 and metastasis in 9 patients. No 30-day mortality occurred. By the end of the study period, 35 patients were alive and 14 had died. The 1-, 5-, and 10-year survival rates were 93.8%, 76.0%, and 71.6%, whereas the overall recurrence-free rates were 84.4%, 70.7%, and 70.7% respectively. Favorable prognostic variables for survival included age <50 years and radical treatment (resection with wide margin or resection with marginal margin and adjuvant radiotherapy). Patients who had undergone nonradical treatment had a 3.1-fold lower chance of survival than did those who had undergone radical treatment (95% confidence interval, 0.96-10.12; P = 0.06). CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that surgical resection with wide margins should continue to be the mainstay for patients with chest wall sarcoma. Even extensive chest wall resections and reconstructions are safe. If wide margins are not achieved, (neo)adjuvant radiotherapy should be considered to improve local control.

Oncologic Resection and Reconstruction of the Chest Wall: A 19-Year Experience in a Single Center.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to analyze chest wall reconstruction following oncologic resection performed by a single surgeon over a 19-year period. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed for 135 patients who underwent oncologic chest wall resection from 1997 to 2015. RESULTS: Average patient age was 57.8 years. Indications for resection were advanced breast cancer (n = 44), soft-tissue sarcoma (n = 38), bone sarcoma or chondrosarcoma (n = 28), desmoid tumor (n = 11), metastasis from other cancers (n = 7), and other primary tumors (n = 7). There were 72 full-thickness and 63 partial-thickness resections (34 soft-tissue resections only and 29 skeletal bone resections only). Resection margins were wide (n = 29), marginal (n = 82), and intralesional (n = 24). Reconstruction was warranted in 118 cases: chest wall stabilization and flap coverage in 57, chest wall stabilization only in 36, and soft-tissue flap coverage only in 25 cases. In total, 82 flaps were performed (17 free flaps and 65 pedicled/local flaps). There were no perioperative mortalities or flap losses. Complications occurred in 29 operations (Clavien-Dindo classifications grade II, n = 12; grade IIIa, n = 4; grade IIIb, n = 10; and grade IVa, n = 3) and 19 reoperations were necessary. Median follow-up was 49 months. Survival was calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method. One-, 2-, and 5-year survival rates were 84, 82, and 70 percent, respectively. CONCLUSION: With careful patient selection, appropriate perioperative and postoperative care, and accurate surgical technique, even extensive chest wall resections and reconstructions are safe. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, IV.

Diaphragm reconstruction combined with thoraco-abdominal wall reconstruction after tumor resection.

BACKGROUND: Thoraco-abdominal wall resection including diaphragm resection results in a challenging surgical defect. Various methods have been used for diaphragm reconstruction. The aim of this study was to describe our methods of diaphragm and thoraco-abdominal wall reconstruction after combined resection of these anatomical structures. METHODS: Twenty-one patients underwent diaphragm resection at our institution between 1997 and 2015. We used a mesh or direct closure for diaphragm defect and a mesh for chest wall stabilization. A pedicled or free flap for soft tissue coverage was used when direct closure was not possible. RESULTS: Indications for resection were primary sarcoma (n = 14), cancer metastasis (n = 4), desmoid tumor (n = 2), and solitary fibrous tumor (n = 1). The median patient age was 58.9 years. The diaphragm was pulled to its original position and sutured directly (n = 15) or reconstructed with mesh (n = 6). Chest wall reconstructions were performed with a mesh (n = 14), mesh and a pedicled flap (n = 4), mesh and a free flap (n = 3). No perioperative mortality occurred. One-year and 5-year survival rates were 85.7 and 65.9%, respectively, while overall recurrence-free rates were 80.4 and 60.8%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: We have described our surgical methods for the resection of tumors of the chest or abdominal wall, including our method of distal diaphragm resection with wide or clear surgical margins. The method is safe and the reconstructions provided adequate stability, as well as water-tight and air-tight closure of the chest cavity. There were no cases of paradoxical movement of the chest or of diaphragm or thoraco-abdominal hernia.