Therapies and outcomes of congenital hyperinsulinism-induced hypoglycaemia.

Congenital hyperinsulinism is a rare disease, but is the most frequent cause of persistent and severe hypoglycaemia in early childhood. Hypoglycaemia caused by excessive and dysregulated insulin secretion (hyperinsulinism) from disordered pancreatic ß cells can often lead to irreversible brain damage with lifelong neurodisability. Although congenital hyperinsulinism has a genetic cause in a significant proportion (40%) of children, often being the result of mutations in the genes encoding the KATP channel (ABCC8 and KCNJ11), not all children have severe and persistent forms of the disease. In approximately half of those without a genetic mutation, hyperinsulinism may resolve, although timescales are unpredictable. From a histopathology perspective, congenital hyperinsulinism is broadly grouped into diffuse and focal forms, with surgical lesionectomy being the preferred choice of treatment in the latter. In contrast, in diffuse congenital hyperinsulinism, medical treatment is the best option if conservative management is safe and effective. In such cases, children receiving treatment with drugs, such as diazoxide and octreotide, should be monitored for side effects and for signs of reduction in disease severity. If hypoglycaemia is not safely managed by medical therapy, subtotal pancreatectomy may be required; however, persistent hypoglycaemia may continue after surgery and diabetes is an inevitable consequence in later life. It is important to recognize the negative cognitive impact of early-life hypoglycaemia which affects half of all children with congenital hyperinsulinism. Treatment options should be individualized to the child/young person with congenital hyperinsulinism, with full discussion regarding efficacy, side effects, outcomes and later life impact.

Is routine endocrine evaluation necessary after paediatric traumatic brain injury?

BACKGROUND: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a common event in childhood. It is a recognised cause of hypopituitarism both in adult and paediatric patients. Routine endocrine evaluation has been proposed for adult TBI-survivors; nevertheless, incongruous data have been reported in children. AIM: The goal of this study was to describe the prevalence of pituitary dysfunction after TBI in a cohort of children. MATERIAL/SUBJECTS AND METHODS: This is a cross-sectional study comprising retrospective medical record review and prospective testing. Children with brain injury discharged from the Paediatric Intensive Care Unit from year 2004 to 2009 were recruited. Height and weight were recorded, systemic examination was performed and baseline pituitary function tests were undertaken. Provocative tests were performed only if abnormal basal levels were detected. RESULTS: Thirty-six patients were collected; the mean age at assessment was 7.2 years and the mean interval since injury 3.3 years. All patients had skull fracture or intracranial haemorrhage; 36.6 % of them had moderate to severe TBI. No abnormalities were found on examination. Low serum IGF 1 levels were detected in four patients and two patients had low serum cortisol levels with inappropriately normal plasma ACTH concentrations. No evidence of pituitary dysfunction was observed in these patients after clinical follow-up, repeated baseline hormone levels or dynamic function tests. CONCLUSIONS: No endocrine sequelae have been detected in this population. The routine endocrine evaluation in children with mild to moderate TBI might not be justified, according to our findings.