Leveraging Prior Healthy Participant Pharmacokinetic Data to Evaluate the Impact of Renal and Hepatic Impairment on Ritlecitinib Pharmacokinetics.

Ritlecitinib is a selective, covalent, irreversible inhibitor of Janus kinase 3 (JAK3) and the tyrosine kinase expressed in hepatocellular carcinoma (TEC) family kinases. Pharmacokinetics and safety of ritlecitinib in participants with hepatic (Study 1) or renal (Study 2) impairment were to be characterized from two phase I studies. Due to a study pause caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, the study 2 healthy participant (HP) cohort was not recruited; however, the demography of the severe renal impairment cohort closely matched the study 1 HP cohort. We present results from each study and two innovative approaches to utilizing available HP data as reference data for study 2: a statistical approach using analysis of variance and an in silico simulation of an HP cohort created using a population pharmacokinetics (POPPK) model derived from several ritlecitinib studies. For study 1, the observed area under the curve for 24-h dosing interval and maximum plasma concentration for HPs and their observed geometric mean ratios (participants with moderate hepatic impairment vs HPs) were within 90% prediction intervals from the POPPK simulation-based approach, thereby validating the latter approach. When applied to study 2, both the statistical and POPPK simulation approaches demonstrated that patients with renal impairment would not require ritlecitinib dose modification. In both phase I studies, ritlecitinib was generally safe and well tolerated. These analyses represent a new methodology for generating reference HP cohorts in special population studies for drugs in development with well-characterized pharmacokinetics in HPs and adequate POPPK models. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04037865 , NCT04016077 , NCT02309827 , NCT02684760 , and NCT02969044 .

Three-year safety observation of subcutaneous administration of epoetin-zeta in patients with chronic renal anemia: Results from PASCO II study.

Epoetin has been used to treat patients with renal anemia since 1988. -Anti-erythropoietin antibody-mediated pure red cell aplasia (PRCA) has been associated with epoetin usage, and a PRCA incidence of 4.5 per 10,000 patient-years was observed for epoetin-α (Eprex) in 2002. The PASCO II study (post-authorization safety cohort observation of Retacrit and Silapo (epoetin-ζ) administered subcutaneously for the treatment of renal anemia) followed 6,346 patients (4,501 Retacrit (group R); 1,845 Silapo (group S)) for up to 3 years of subcutaneous treatment with the biosimilar epoetin-ζ. One PRCA in 1 (0.02%) patient in group R who tested positive for neutralizing antibodies was reported. Overall, 527 adverse events of special interest (AESI) including PRCA occurred in 418 (6.60%) patients, lack of efficacy occurred in 34 (0.54%), and thromboembolic events in 389 (6.14%) patients. 41 adverse drug reactions other than AESIs were reported in 28 (0.44%) patients. The exposure-adjusted incident rate of PRCA was 0.84 per 10,000 patient-years. This real-world study showed that among patients with renal anemia receiving subcutaneous administration of the biosimilar product epoetin-ζ, the incidence rate of PRCA was substantially below the risk observed in 2002 for Eprex and that there was no immunogenicity concern or other new safety concern.

A randomized study comparing the pharmacokinetics of the potential biosimilar PF-06438179/GP1111 with Remicade® (infliximab) in healthy subjects (REFLECTIONS B537-01).

BACKGROUND: To demonstrate pharmacokinetic (PK) similarity of PF-06438179/GP1111, a potential biosimilar to Remicade®, to Remicade® sourced from European Union (infliximab-EU) and United States (infliximab-US), and of infliximab-EU to infliximab-US. METHODS: In this phase I, parallel-group, three-arm trial, healthy adult subjects were randomized to receive a single 10-mg/kg intravenous infusion of PF-06438179/GP1111, infliximab-EU, or infliximab-US. PK, and safety and immunogenicity evaluations were performed over 8 and 12 weeks, respectively. PK similarity was established if the 90% confidence intervals (CIs) of the test-to-reference ratios for PK parameters, Cmax, AUCT, and AUCinf, were within the 80.00-125.00% pre-specified equivalence window. RESULTS: Of 151 subjects randomized, 146 received study treatment; 130 were eligible for PK similarity assessment. Serum concentration-time profiles were similar across the three treatments. The 90% CIs for test-to-reference ratios for Cmax, AUCT, and AUCinf were within 80.00-125.00% for comparison of PF-06438179/GP1111 to infliximab-EU and infliximab-US, and of infliximab-EU to infliximab-US. Similar numbers of subjects across treatment groups experienced adverse events. Anti-drug and neutralizing antibody profiles were largely similar among groups. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated PK similarity of PF-06438179/GP1111 to infliximab-EU and infliximab-US, and of infliximab-EU to infliximab-US. All three products displayed comparable safety and immunogenicity profiles. TRIAL REGISTRATION: CT.gov identifier NCT01844804.