Perioperative Considerations for Hysterectomy in Second-Trimester Molar Pregnancy.

BACKGROUND: Second-trimester complete molar pregnancies are rare. Due to a later presentation, means to reduce surgical and long-term morbidity from hemorrhage, hyperthyroidism, and gestational trophoblastic neoplasia risk should be considered. CASE: A 48-year-old woman presented at 17 6/7 weeks of gestation with vaginal bleeding, with a human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) level of 483,906 milli-international units/mL, biochemical hyperthyroidism, and ultrasonographic suspicion for complete molar pregnancy. The patient received preoperative uterine artery embolization and antithyroid medication before undergoing total abdominal hysterectomy. Her thyroid function and hCG level normalized by 1 week and 69 days postoperatively, respectively. CONCLUSION: Uterine artery embolization and hysterectomy may reduce surgical blood loss and lower the risk of malignancy for patients at high risk for gestational trophoblastic neoplasia. Preoperative treatment of hyperthyroidism with gestational trophoblastic disease can reduce morbidity from thyrotoxicosis.

Validity Study of an End-of-Clerkship Oral Examination in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

OBJECTIVE: Surgical clerkships frequently include oral exams to assess students' ability to critically analyze data and utilize clinical judgment during common scenarios. Limited guidance exists for the interpretation of oral exam score validity, thus making improvements difficult to target. We examined the development, administration, and scoring of a clerkship oral exam from a validity evidence framework. DESIGN: This was a retrospective study of a third-year, end-of-clerkship oral exam in obstetrics and gynecology (OBGYN). Content, response process, internal structure, and relationship to other variables validity evidence was collected and evaluated for 5 versions of the oral exam. SETTING: Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York City. PARTICIPANTS: Participants were 186 third-year medical students who completed the OBGYN clerkship in the academic year 2020 to 2021. RESULTS: The average number of objectives assessed per oral exam version were uniform, but the distribution of questions per Bloom's level of cognition was uneven. Student scores on all questions regardless of Bloom's level of cognition were >87%, and reliability (Cronbach's alpha) of item scores varied from 0.58 to 0.74. There was a moderate, positive correlation (Spearman's rho) between the oral exam scores and national shelf exam scores (0.35). There were low correlations between oral exam scores and (a) clinical performance ratings (0.14) and (b) formal presentation scores (-0.19). CONCLUSIONS: This study provides an example of how to examine the validity of oral exam scores for targeted improvements. Further modifications are needed before using scores for high stakes decisions. The authors provide recommendations for additional sources of validity evidence to collect in order to better meet the goals of any surgical clerkship oral exam.

The Effects of Leadership Curricula With and Without Implicit Bias Training on Graduate Medical Education: A Multicenter Randomized Trial.

PURPOSE: To determine whether a brief leadership curriculum including high-fidelity simulation can improve leadership skills among resident physicians. METHOD: This was a double-blind, randomized controlled trial among obstetrics-gynecology and emergency medicine (EM) residents across 5 academic medical centers from different geographic areas of the United States, 2015-2017. Participants were assigned to 1 of 3 study arms: the Leadership Education Advanced During Simulation (LEADS) curriculum, a shortened Team Strategies and Tools to Enhance Performance and Patient Safety (TeamSTEPPS) curriculum, or as active controls (no leadership curriculum). Active controls were recruited from a separate site and not randomized to limit any unintentional introduction of materials from leadership curricula. The LEADS curriculum was developed in partnership with the Council on Resident Education in Obstetrics and Gynecology and Council of Residency Directors in Emergency Medicine as a novel way to provide a leadership toolkit. Both LEADS and the abbreviated TeamSTEPPS were designed as six 10-minute interactive web-based modules.The primary outcome of interest was the leadership performance score from the validated Clinical Teamwork Scale instrument measured during standardized high-fidelity simulation scenarios. Secondary outcomes were 9 key components of leadership from the detailed leadership evaluation measured on 5-point Likert scales. Both outcomes were rated by a blinded clinical video reviewer. RESULTS: One hundred ten obstetrics-gynecology and EM residents participated in this 2-year trial. Participants in both LEADS and TeamSTEPPS had statistically significant improvement in leadership scores from "average" to "good" ranges both immediately and at the 6-month follow-up, while controls remained unchanged in the "average" category throughout the study. There were no differences between LEADS and TeamSTEPPS curricula with respect to the primary outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Residents who participated in a brief structured leadership training intervention had improved leadership skills that were maintained at 6-month follow-up.

The RCA ReCAst: A Root Cause Analysis Simulation for the Interprofessional Clinical Learning Environment.

PROBLEM: The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education calls for resident participation in real or simulated interprofessional analysis of a patient safety event. There are far more residents who must participate in these investigations than available institutional root cause analyses (RCAs) to accommodate them. To correct this imbalance, the authors developed an institutionally sponsored, interprofessional RCA simulation program and implemented it across all graduate medical education (GME) residency programs at the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania. APPROACH: The authors developed RCA simulations based upon authentic adverse events experienced at their institution. To provide relevance to all GME programs, RCA simulation cases varied widely and included examples of errors involving high-risk medications, communication, invasive procedures, and specimen labeling. Each simulation included residents and other health care professionals such as nurses or pharmacists whose disciplines were involved in the actual event. Participants adopted the role of RCA investigation team, and in small groups systematically progressed through the RCA process. OUTCOMES: A total of 289 individuals from 18 residency programs participated in an RCA simulation in 2019-2020. This included 84 interns (29%), 123 residents (43%), 20 attending physicians (7%), and 62 (21%) other health care professionals. There was an increase in ability of GME trainees to correctly identify factors required for an RCA investigation (62% pre vs 80% post, P = .02) and an increase in intent to "always report" for each adverse event category (3% pre vs 37% post, P < .001) following the simulation. NEXT STEPS: The authors plan to expand the RCA simulation program to other GME clinical sites while striving to involve all GME learners in this educational experience at least once during training. Additionally, by collaborating with health system patient safety leaders, they will annually review all new RCAs to identify cases suitable for simulation adaptation.

Comparison of nontechnical skills grading rubrics for OR in situ simulation for general surgery and Obstetrician/Gynecologist residents.

BACKGROUND: This study utilized the Team Strategies and Tools to Enhance Performance and Patient Safety and the Nontechnical Skills for Surgeons grading systems to evaluate the nontechnical skills of general surgery and obstetrician/gynecologist residents to see if these grading systems were concordant. These simulations were also intended to teach about crisis resources available at our institution. METHODS: Nineteen teams were created consisting of either one general surgery resident or 2 Obstetrician/Gynecologist residents plus 2 Anesthesia residents and 2 to 4 nurses. Each team was given a short briefing on Team Strategies and Tools to Enhance Performance and Patient Safety, then performed 2 simulated operating room crises. All exercises were graded by 2 independent observers with experience in the operating room and in using the Team Strategies and Tools to Enhance Performance and Patient Safety and Nontechnical Skills for Surgeons grading systems. RESULTS: Averaged general surgery Team Strategies and Tools To Enhance Performance and Patient Safety score increased between scenarios (14.3-17; P ≤ .01), as did obstetrician/gynecologist Team Strategies and Tools to Enhance Performance and Patient Safety score (14.9-19.2; P ≤ .01). Averaged general surgery Nontechnical Skills for Surgeons score increased between scenarios (10.3-12.2; P ≤ .02), as did obstetrician/gynecologist Nontechnical Skills for Surgeons score (10.2-14.3; P ≤ .01). Surgery Team Strategies and Tools to Enhance Performance and Patient Safety scores demonstrated a strong correlation of movement with Nontechnical Skills for Surgeons scores (r = 0.83), as did obstetrician/gynecologist (r = 0.91). On average both general surgery (11%-100%; P ≤ .01) and obstetrician/gynecologist (50%-90%; P ≤ .01) saw a statistically significant increase in their awareness of the crisis checklist. CONCLUSION: Team Strategies and Tools to Enhance and Patient Safety scores and Nontechnical Skills for Surgeons are effective and concordant tools for gauging general surgery and obstetrician/gynecologist resident nontechnical skills. In situ simulations are an effective way to teach general surgery and obstetrician/gynecologist residents about available crisis resources.

Development and Validation of a Mental Practice Tool for Total Abdominal Hysterectomy.

OBJECTIVE: Total abdominal hysterectomy (TAH) is a common operation performed by obstetrician-gynecologists. Training opportunities for this procedure are declining. Mental practice (MP), the use of mental imagery to rehearse a task symbolically before performance, has been used successfully in sports and music to enhance skill. This strategy demonstrates benefit in existing surgical education literature. We aimed to develop and validate a MP tool (MPT) for resident training in TAH. DESIGN: A prospective survey study was performed in a large, urban, academic medical center in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA. A MPT was developed by guiding expert surgeons through a cognitive walk-through of TAH to identify key procedural cues. For validation, a convenience sample of 22 residents and attendings (N = 11 per group) mentally rehearsed TAH. Motivation, confidence, quality of imagery, and utility of the activity were assessed with a previously validated Mental Imagery Questionnaire (MIQ) before and after exposure to the MPT. RESULTS: Residents, but not attendings, found MP to be useful in preparation for surgery (residents, p = 0.01; attendings, p = 0.34) and had increased confidence following this exercise (residents, p = 0.01; attendings, p = 0.08). Significant improvement in global imagery score after use of the tool was shown by residents (p = 0.01) but not by the attendings (p = 0.08), with residents having lower imagery skills than attendings both pre-MP and post-MP. Reliability testing of the MIQ indicated internal consistency (pre-MPT, 0.91; post-MPT, 0.90). CONCLUSIONS: MP may serve as a potentially effective, portable, and inexpensive resident surgical training tool in preparation for TAH. Attendings may benefit from certain aspects of MP. The MIQ may serve as a measure of imagery skills in future experiments of MP in preparation for surgery.

Development and validation of simulation training for vaginal hysterectomy.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To develop and validate an educational intervention based on vaginal hysterectomy (VH) simulation. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study (Canadian Task Force classification II-2). SETTING: Surgical skills simulation center. PATIENTS: Thirty residents in Obstetrics and Gynecology (11 PGY-2, 11 PGY-3, and 8 PGY-4). INTERVENTION: VH educational intervention that included a lecture, a video, and surgical skill simulation using a new inexpensive model. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The primary outcome was written test scores before and after the educational intervention, and the secondary outcome was self-rated confidence in performing VH. Baseline written scores were similar for all 3 training levels; however, baseline confidence scores were higher for PGY-3 and PGY-4 residents than for PGY-2 residents (p < .01). After the workshop, written test scores improved significantly for all trainees (median [range] improvement, 4 [3.5-5.0] points; p < .01). Mean (SD) improvement in confidence scores for PGY-4, PGY-3, and PGY-2 residents was 0 (0.5), 0.5 (0.8), and 1 (1.3), respectively, with improvement in confidence scores reaching significance only for PGY-2 residents (p < .02). All trainees expressed high satisfaction with the workshop. CONCLUSION: An educational intervention based on VH simulation is feasible and improves knowledge and confidence in junior residents with limited exposure to VH.