Alpha interferon treatment may prevent hepatocellular carcinoma in HCV-related liver cirrhosis.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The aims of alpha-interferon treatment for chronic viral liver infections are clearance of the virus and healing of the disease. Hepatocellular carcinoma is a complication of viral cirrhosis; but it is not yet known whether treatment of viral cirrhosis with alpha-interferon prevents this complication. METHODS: The incidence and the risk (Cox regression analysis) of developing hepatocellular carcinoma were calculated in 347 patients with hepatic cirrhosis; 227 (34 hepatitis B virus and 193 hepatitis C virus related) were treated with alpha-interferon and 120 (28 hepatitis B virus and 92 hepatitis C virus) did not receive this treatment, in order to evaluate the efficacy of alpha-interferon in the prevention of hepatocellular carcinoma. In all patients, the cirrhosis was well compensated (Child A). RESULTS: Over mean follow-up periods of 49 months for hepatitis B virus and 32 months for hepatitis C virus, 20/347 patients (6/62 hepatitis B virus and 14/285 hepatitis C virus) developed hepatocellular carcinoma. The risk of developing this tumor was significantly greater in males (p < 0.007) and in patients not treated with alpha-interferon (p < 0.01). The Relative Risk of developing hepatocellular carcinoma increased significantly (p < 0.0002) with each passing year. In patients with hepatic cirrhosis secondary to hepatitis B virus infections, the risk did not seem to be modified by alpha-interferon treatment, even though a greater, but not significant risk (Relative Risk = 4.9; p = 0.3) was calculated for untreated patients; in contrast, in hepatitis C virus-related cirrhosis, this risk was reduced by a factor of 4.0 (p = 0.04). The tumor developed only in non-responder patients regardless of virus type. After adjustment for confounding factors (sex, age, alcohol consumption, cigarette smoking), a statistically significant (p < 0.025) effect of interferon treatment in preventing hepatocellular carcinoma was still demonstrated when responders were matched with controls, but not when responders were compared with non-responders. CONCLUSIONS: These results show that, in addition to its ability to halt the progression of viral-induced liver disease, alpha-interferon is also of benefit in patients with hepatitis C virus cirrhosis who respond to this treatment by lowering their risk of developing hepatocellular carcinoma.

Treatment of chronic sporadic-type non-A, non-B hepatitis with lymphoblastoid interferon: gamma GT levels predictive for response.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of human lymphoblastoid interferon-alpha treatment in chronic sporadic-type non-A, non-B hepatitis. We also aimed to determine if histological or liver function data could predict either response or relapse. Sixty patients with chronic sporadic-type non-A, non-B hepatitis were randomized in two groups of 30. One group was treated with interferon-alpha (3 MU thrice weekly) for one year; the other group was untreated controls. The treated group was followed for another year after interferon withdrawal. Liver function tests were performed during treatment. Liver biopsy was carried out before and a year after randomization. We evaluated rate of response [normalization of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels for at least three consecutive months] and rate of relapse (ALT rebound after therapy suspension). We also looked at possible predictive factors for response and relapse. In the treatment group the rate of response was 55% (16/29). No control patient exhibited ALT normalization. Among the responders, 31% (5/16) relapsed after interferon withdrawal. Low gamma GT and female sex are positive predictive factors of response (P < 0.01 and P < 0.02 respectively). Presence of portal and periportal inflammation at the second liver biopsy was correlated with relapse (P < 0.05). In conclusion, human lymphoblastoid interferon-alpha treatment for one year is beneficial in patients suffering from chronic sporadic-type non-A, non-B hepatitis. Low pretreatment gamma GT levels and female sex are positive predictors of response in this patient population.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Influence of ursodeoxycholic acid on biliary lipids.

The advent of bile acid therapy has shed some light on the mechanisms involved in determining bile lipid secretion. The administration of cholelytic bile acids results in a lowering of cholesterol percent molar and saturation index due to a reduction in cholesterol secretion. Studies carried out after administration of bile acids showed initially that biliary cholesterol secretion rates were dependent on the hydrophobic/hydrophilic balance of the prevailing bile acid present in bile. However, more detailed investigations showed that some bile acids (cholic and chenodeoxycholic acids) did not follow this rule because of the presence of other mechanisms involved in determining biliary cholesterol secretion and a possible link between cholesterol synthesis and biliary cholesterol secretion. Several different human models have been used in more recent studies to arrive at a better understanding of the mechanisms involved in determining bile lipid secretion: obese patients, obese patients in rapid weight loss, patients with non-familial hypercholesterolemia and primary biliary cirrhosis. The findings in these studies indicate how modifications in biliary lipid secretion can easily be induced when there are changes in the relative amounts of bile acids. These changes may bring about modifications in intestinal absorption, liver synthesis, and secretion of cholesterol and bile acids that could possibly lead to the formation of lithogenic bile and subsequently to cholesterol gallstones.

[Effects of therapy with bis-hemisuccinate of ursodeoxycholic acid bisodium salt in patients with chronic hepatitis]. / Effetto della terapia con bis-emisuccinato dell'acido ursodesossicolico sale bisodico in pazienti con epatiti croniche.

It has recently been shown that ursodeoxycholic acid administration improves liver function tests in patients with chronic liver diseases. Aim of the present study was to evaluate an ursodeoxycholic acid derivative (bis-hemisuccinate bisodic salt Ursodamor, Farmaceutici Damor, Napoli) in patients with chronic hepatitis. Forty patients (15 M, 25 F) with biopsy proven chronic liver disease participated to the study. Patients were randomly allocated to two treatment groups. Twenty patients (4 PBC, 11 CAH/CPH, 5 cirrhosis) received the ursodeoxycholic acid derivate at the dose of 600 mg/day, while 20 patients (1 PBC, 11 CAH/CPH, 8 cirrhosis) received a placebo. For both groups the treatment period was six months. ALT serum levels were significantly reduced in the treated group (from 84 +/- 14 to 62 +/- 14 p less than 0.0005) while no significant change was observed in the placebo group. In the treated group but not in the placebo group alkaline phosphatases and gamma-GT were also significantly reduced (from 268 +/- 56 to 160 +/- 23 p less than 0.0005 and from 79 +/- 21 to 45 +/- 10 p less than 0.0005). In conclusion, our results suggest that the administration of the ursodeoxycholic acid derivate, bis-hemisuccinate, bisodic salt, improves liver function tests in patients with chronic liver hepatitis. Similarly to ursodeoxycholic acid this new derivate probably interferes with bile acid pool composition by replacing the more detergent and probably more toxic endogenous bile acid.

Effect of simvastatin, ursodeoxycholic acid and simvastatin plus ursodeoxycholic acid on biliary lipid secretion and cholic acid kinetics in nonfamilial hypercholesterolemia.

It has been recently shown that the newest hypocholesterolemic agent, simvastatin, lowers the biliary cholesterol saturation index and that its association with ursodeoxycholic acid renders it more effective. To determine the mechanism by which simvastatin decreases the biliary cholesterol saturation index, we evaluated hepatic secretion rates of cholesterol, bile acids and phospholipids, and cholic acid pool size, turnover and synthesis in eight hyperlipidemic patients (five women and three men, age range = 38 to 65 yr). These assessments were conducted before treatment, after 4 wk of simvastatin (40 mg/day), after 4 wk of ursodeoxycholic acid (600 mg/day) and after a further 4 wk of a combination therapy of simvastatin (40 mg/day) plus ursodeoxycholic acid (600 mg/day). The cholesterol saturation index was significantly reduced with simvastatin (from 1.51 +/- 0.10 to 0.94 +/- 0.05, mean +/- S.E.; p less than 0.02), with ursodeoxycholic acid (from 1.51 +/- 0.10 to 0.86 +/- 0.03, mean +/- S.E.; p less than 0.02) and with the combination of simvastatin plus ursodeoxycholic acid (from 1.51 +/- 0.01 to 0.70 +/- 0.05, p less than 0.02). The cholesterol saturation index during combination therapy was significantly lower (p less than 0.02) than that reached during the use of simvastatin and ursodeoxycholic acid. Both simvastatin and ursodeoxycholic acid significantly reduced the hepatic secretion rate of cholesterol (from 130 +/- 14 mumols/hr to 81 +/- 12 mumols/hr, p less than 0.01, and 70 +/- 9 mumols/hr, p less than 0.01) without affecting bile acid and phospholipid outputs.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)