RESUMO
Seemingly coincidental occurrence of various pathological conditions may derive from common etiologic denominators. While reviewing 240 malpractice claims involving shoulder dystocia related fetal injuries, we found two antenatal complications in the background conspicuously often. Chronic or pregnancy induced hypertension was identifiable in 80 instances (33%). Pregnancy induced or preexisting diabetes was diagnosed 48 times (20%). Many of these patients were poorly controlled. The blood pressure was usually checked during the antenatal visits. However, about one-half of all patients received no diabetic screening. Therefore, this study may underestimate the actual incidence of diabetes. It has been calculated that the frequency of diabetes in pregnancy and that of hypertension, is about 5% in the United States. Thus, the rates of these complications in this selected group of gravidas was severalfold higher than in the general population. Since hypertension causes retarded fetal growth, it cannot be a direct cause of arrest of the shoulders at delivery. The likely common denominator is maternal diabetes a known predisposing factor both for preeclampsia and shoulder dystocia at birth. In the course of litigations for fetal injuries, demonstration of the predisposing role of seemingly unrelated shortcomings of the medical management may profoundly influence the outcome. This principle is demonstrated by the presentation of an actual malpractice action which resulted in a substantial settlement.
