Discrepancies in Race and Ethnicity in the Electronic Health Record Compared to Self-report.

OBJECTIVE: Racial and ethnic disparities are commonplace in health care. Research often relies on sociodemographic information recorded in the electronic health record (EHR). Little evidence is available about the accuracy of EHR-recorded sociodemographic information, and none in pediatrics. Our objective was to determine the accuracy of EHR-recorded race and ethnicity compared to self-report. METHODS: Patients/guardians enrolled in two prospective observational studies (10/2014-1/2019) provided self-reported sociodemographic information. Corresponding EHR information was abstracted. EHR information was compared to self-report, considered "gold standard." Agreement was evaluated with Cohen's kappa. RESULTS: A total of 503 patients (42% female, median age 12.8 years) were identified. Self-reported race (N = 484) was 73% White, 16% Black or African American (AA), 4% Asian, 5% multiracial, and 2% other. Self-reported ethnicity (N = 410) was 9% Hispanic/Latino, and 88% non-Hispanic/Latino. Agreement between self-reported and EHR-recorded race was substantial (kappa = 0.77, 95% CI 0.72-0.83). Race was discordant among 10% (47/476). Hispanic/Latino ethnicity also had strong agreement (kappa = 0.77, 95% CI 0.65-0.89). Among those who self-reported Hispanic/Latino and reported race (N = 21), race was less accurately recorded in the EHR (kappa = 0.26, 95% CI 0-0.54). Race did not match among 43% with recorded race (9/21). Among self-reported racial and/or ethnic minorities, 13% (12/164) were misclassified in the EHR as non-Hispanic White. CONCLUSIONS: We found race and ethnicity are often inaccurately recorded in the EHR for patients who self-identify as minorities, leading to under-representation of minorities in the EHR. Inaccurately recorded race and ethnicity has important implications for disparity research, and for informing health policy. Reliable processes are needed to incorporate self-reported race and ethnicity in the EHR at institutional and national levels.

Barriers and Facilitators of Colorectal Cancer Screening Among a Hispanic Community in Michigan.

INTRODUCTION: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third leading cause in the USA for cancer-related deaths. Hispanics demonstrate the lowest CRC screening (CRCS) rate and research suggests that causes of screening disparities differ among ethnic groups and geographic locations. The aim of this study was to determine the rate of CRCS and to identify barriers and facilitators to screening in the Hispanic population of Flint, Michigan METHODS: Cross-sectional study. Consenting participants completed a previously validated survey in their language of preference. Variables obtained included sociodemographic information, insurance status, language preference, primary care physician (PCP), language spoken by PCP, recommendation of CRCS, acculturation, and fatalism. Univariate and multivariate logistic regressions were performed to determine the association between predictors associated with previous CRCS. RESULTS: Seventy subjects completed the survey. Overall previous CRCS rate was 60%. Multivariate results indicated that having a physician that speaks both English and Spanish significantly increases the likelihood of CRCS. It also indicated that those who have been living in the USA for equal or less than 30 years and those that physician had never recommended screening were less likely to have been screened. DISCUSSION: Our study provides important preliminary data that may help improve CRCS among this Hispanic population. Interventions include providing a list of bilingual physicians in the community and to educate them regarding CRCS to mitigate the lack of physician recommendations. Notably, this study highlights the importance of cultural sensitivity and competence in preventive healthcare to promote inclusiveness of minority populations.