Femtosecond Laser-Assisted Anterior Lamellar Keratoplasty as a Treatment Modality for Recalcitrant Post-Laser in situ Keratomileusis Epithelial Ingrowth.

The purpose is to present the outcomes of anterior lamellar keratoplasty for a case of post-laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) epithelial ingrowth. A 40-year-old male patient presented with epithelial ingrowth 14 years after primary LASIK with a microkeratome blade in the right eye following trauma. Multiple stromal bed washing was done over a period of 3 years, but recurrence of epithelial ingrowth was seen every time. Femtosecond laser-assisted anterior lamellar keratoplasty was performed in the right eye. Twelve months after the procedure, the patient's corrected distance visual acuity improved to 6/9, and no recurrence was noted. Femtosecond laser-assisted anterior lamellar keratoplasty is an effective treatment modality in cases of recurrent recalcitrant epithelial ingrowth seen after LASIK.

Comparison of cross cylinder ablation using the optimized ablation transition zone and the torsion error detector for correction of astigmatism.

PURPOSE: To compare the safety and efficacy of laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) in correcting high myopic astigmatism using two different ablation profiles using the Nidek EC-5000 CX II laser). METHODS: Fifteen patients (25 eyes) had LASIK for compound myopic astigmatism, using the Optimized Ablation Transition Zone (OATz) ablation profile and activated torsion error detection (TED). Results were compared with those obtained with a cross cylinder ablation profile for myopic astigmatism. RESULTS: For eyes treated with TED, on postoperative day 7, 76% had visual acuity equal to or better than baseline best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA) and 56% of eyes had overcorrected astigmatism. On postoperative day 20, none of the eyes had residual astigmatism more than 1.00 D and 72% eyes were within +/-0.50 D cylinder; 92% of eyes had residual astigmatism within 30 degrees of the preoperative axis and 12% remained astigmatically overcorrected at 20 days. Eighty-eight percent of eyes were either fully corrected or had mild myopic astigmatism. Comparison of results with cross cylinder ablation showed that 24% had overcorrection and 60% of patients with high astigmatism were overcorrected up to 1.75 D and developed hyperopic astigmatism in the opposite axis. Results with the cross cylinder ablation profile were good up to 2.00 D of myopic astigmatism. CONCLUSIONS: Correction of astigmatism using the OATz profile and TED with the Nidek EC-5000 CX II laser produced good results in high as well as pure astigmatism treatments, compared to the cross cylinder ablation profile. Ablation depth was greater in OATz with TED-based corrections. Overcorrections were less with OATz with TED, and residual astigmatism was at the same baseline axis, thereby increasing patient satisfaction.