Outcomes of Renal Transplant Recipients With SARS-CoV-2 Infection in the Eye of the Storm: A Comparative Study With Waitlisted Patients.

BACKGROUND: Patients with chronic kidney disease stage 5 and those on immunosuppression are particularly vulnerable and are shielded as per public health strategy. We present our experience of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) transplant patients in one of the most affected parts of the UK with direct comparison to waitlisted patients. METHODS: A single-center prospective study of symptomatic severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) positive waitlisted and transplant patients was undertaken to compare these groups and assess clinical outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 60 consecutive symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 positive patients were identified with 32 active waitlisted patients and 28 functioning renal transplants. Demographics were similar. The incidence of symptomatic COVID-19 in the waitlisted group was 9.9% compared to 1.9% in renal transplant patients (P < 0.001). Immunosuppression did not influence initial symptomology. Fifteen percent of patients in the waitlisted and 32% in the transplant groups died (P = 0.726). Mortality as proportion of total waitlisted (321 patients) and transplant population (1434 patients) of our centre was 1.5% and 0.6% (P < 0.001), respectively. C-reactive protein (CRP) at 48 h and peak CRP were associated with mortality in both groups while quick sequential organ failure assessment score at 48 h (P = 0.036) was associated with mortality for transplant patients. CONCLUSIONS: Incidence of COVID-19 is higher in the waitlisted population but transplant patients have more severe disease, reflected by higher mortality. CRP at 48 h can be used as a predictive tool. In the absence of effective treatments, the current strategy of shielding is arguably the most important factor in protecting patients while resuming transplantation.

Outcome of surgical complications following simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Simultaneous pancreas-kidney (SPK) transplantation carries a higher risk of surgical complications than kidney transplantation alone. We aimed to establish the incidence of surgical complications after SPK transplantation and determine the effect on graft and patient survival. METHODS: Outcomes of all SPK transplants performed at our centre were compared between patients who experienced a surgical complication (SC group) and those who did not (NSC group). RESULTS: Our centre performed 193 SPK transplants in a 15-year period; 44 patients (23%) experienced a surgical complication. One-year and 5-year pancreatic graft survival was 89 and 80%, respectively; this was lower in the SC group. There was no significant difference in patient or kidney graft survival between the SC and NSC groups at 5 years (92 and 83%, respectively.) CONCLUSION: Surgical complications following SPK transplantation can cause significant morbidity and adversely affect pancreas graft survival, but do not affect long-term kidney or patient survival.

Standard chronic immunosuppression after kidney transplantation for systemic lupus erythematosus eliminates recurrence of disease.

BACKGROUND: There is only limited experience in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) with drugs that have developed for immunosuppression after organ transplantation, namely calcineurin inhibitors (CI). The aim of this study is to determine the effect of these drugs on disease activity after kidney transplant in patients affected by SLE. METHODS: Between January 1990 to March 2003, 13 patients with end- stage renal disease secondary to SLE received 14 kidney transplants. The outcome variables assessed include graft and patient survival as well as clinical and serological lupus activity. RESULTS: All received CI-based immunosuppression (cyclosporine or tacrolimus). Actuarial patient and graft survivals at 5 yr were 100 and 93%, respectively. Recurrence of clinical or serological disease was never detected. CONCLUSIONS: To date, only anecdotal experience with CI in the treatment of SLE has been reported. The favorable response observed in our patients suggests that CI at low-doses are effective in preventing SLE-reactivation. Further studies focused on calcineurin inhibitor treatment in SLE patients who fail to respond to standard medical management should be conducted.

Living related small bowel transplantation in children: 3-dimensional computed tomography donor evaluation.

The evaluation of the small bowel vascular anatomy of living small bowel donors (LSBD) is usually performed with conventional angiography (CA). Recently, angio computed tomography (CT) has become a valid study of the vascular anatomy for kidney and liver living donors. We studied the applicability of angio CT with 3-D reconstruction (3-D-ACT) in the evaluation of LSBD. Potential LSBDs for pediatric transplant underwent both CA and 3-D-ACT to evaluate the anatomy of the distal branches of the superior mesenteric artery and vein. Angio-CT was performed with General Electric Lightspeed Scanner. The 3-D reconstruction was performed on the TeraRecon workstation. Adverse reactions, contrast dosage, test duration, invasiveness, hospital-stay, patient discomforts and accuracy were evaluated. Four potential donors (four female; mean age: 30.5 yr; mean BMI: 28.4) underwent both tests. Adverse reactions correlated to contrast agent used (90 mL CA, 150 mL 3-D-ACT) were not reported. CA required a hospitalization of 6 h as opposed to immediate discharge after the 3-D-ACT. The CA required the placement of transfemoral catheter and therefore greater patient discomfort than with 3-D-ACT. The 3-D-ACT arterial images were rated as equivalent to CA, however, 3-D-ACT venous images were rated better than the CA in all cases. CT-angiography with 3-D reconstruction is an acceptable method for vascular evaluation. When compared with routine angiography, it is less invasive, better tolerated and faster, but does require a significantly greater volume of venous contrast. 3-D-ACT also offers a better evaluation of the venous phase, and thus may become the test of choice to evaluate the vascular anatomies of LSBD candidates.

Successful simultaneous pancreas kidney transplantation from living-related donor against positive cross-match.

A positive pretransplant flow cytometry cross-match (FC-XM) allows precise identification of high-risk recipients vulnerable to hyperacute or accelerated rejection after transplantation. Living donor kidney transplant recipient candidates with positive cross-match have been successfully treated with a combination of plasmapheresis (therapeutic plasma exchange, TPEX) and intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG), achieving conversion to negative cross-match and successful transplant. We report the first successful case of simultaneous pancreas kidney transplant (SPKT) from a living donor (LD) performed against an initially positive FC-XM, converted to negative using a protocol based on TPEX and IVIG in combination with antiCD20 monoclonal antibody. This strategy of overcoming the cross-match barriers in living donation may offer a chance of successful transplantation to highly sensitized candidates for SPKT, for whom cadaveric transplant is difficult to achieve.

Surgical treatment of hepatocellular cancer in the era of hepatic transplantation.

BACKGROUND: This study compares liver resection (LR) or transplantation (LTx) in an attempt to reevaluate the indications for treatment. STUDY DESIGN: One hundred fifty-four LRs and 121 LTxs performed from 1985 to 1999 were considered. Survival and recurrence rate, together with age, gender, liver disease, Child-Pugh classification, alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), tumor capsule, vascular invasion, size, number of nodules, histologic grade, and pTNM were considered. Followup was completed in all cases (mean +/- SD = 3.2 +/- 2.9 years). RESULTS: The 5- and 10-year actuarial survival rates were 61.7% and 59.8% in LTx and 46.9% and 28.0% in LR (p = 0.08). Recurrence-free survival was 85.9% and 85.9%, respectively, in LTx and 42.8% and 30.7% in LR (p < 0.0001). In both groups, size, capsule, AFP, vascular invasion, grade, pTNM, Child-Pugh classification, and age were all significantly related to survival and cancer recurrence. pTNM, AFP, Child-Pugh classification, and age, in LR, and capsule, AFP, and viral cirrhosis, in LTx, were significant independent variables in Cox's regression model for survival. Only AFP, vascular invasion, and grade were significant in both groups for recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: LTx offers better recurrence freedom than LR, but longterm survival is not significantly different in the two series. A strict selection should be made to optimize graft allocation. Size and multifocality should not be considered absolute contraindications for LTx. AFP, vascular invasion, and grade are more likely to reflect the risk of recurrence of the disease. LR should be considered in patients who do not fulfill transplant criteria and also in some categories of patients with certain tumor characteristics (small resectable tumors in well-compensated cirrhosis).

Liver transplantation for hepatocellular cancer: should the current indication criteria be changed?

Liver transplantation (LTx) is the best treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), but should be offered only to selected patients. The usual procedure is to transplant only for small and unilobular tumors. The aim of this paper is to verify whether the actual indication criteria are still justified. The details of 121 patients with HCC who were submitted to LTx from 1985 to 2000 were analyzed. Age, gender, liver disease, Child class, alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) level, presence of tumor capsule, vascular invasion, size and number of nodules, histological grade, and pTNM were considered. The 5- and 10-year actuarial survival rates were 61.7% and 53.1%. Freedom from recurrence was 85.9% and 85.9%, respectively. At univariate analysis, size, presence of capsule, AFP levels, vascular invasion, grade, pTNM, transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), Child class, and age were all significantly related to survival and/or cancer recurrence. Presence of capsule, AFP levels, and viral cirrhosis were independent variables in Cox's analysis for survival, whereas histological grade, AFP levels, and vascular invasion were significant independent variables for recurrence. In conclusion, a strict selection should be made to optimize graft allocation while size and multifocality should probably no longer be considered a contraindication for LTx. Histological grade, AFP levels, and vascular invasion, as indicator of tumor behavior, more likely reflect the risk of recurrence.