Long-term response control in a patient with metastatic squamous cell lung cancer after treatment with nivolumab: a case report.

INTRODUCTION: Nivolumab is a fully human programmed death control immune point 1 immune checkpoint inhibitor antibody which promotes antitumor immunity. Cutaneous toxicity associated with nivolumab, immune system related, could be linked to a more durable response in patients with squamous cell lung cancer. CASE REPORT: We present the case of a 62-year-old male diagnosed with metastatic squamous cell lung cancer, who was treated with nivolumab after cytotoxic chemotherapy. After treatment discontinuation, due to grade 2 cutaneous toxicity, the patient is maintaining with durable partial response for more than one year with close follow-up. MANAGEMENT AND OUTCOME: Cumulative doses of nivolumab could cause immunological toxicities that may prolong survival of these patients even after discontinuation of treatment. DISCUSSION: Nivolumab was approved by European Medicines Agency (EMA), as second-line therapeutic, for the treatment of squamous cell lung cancer, showing a median of 9.23 months of overall survival. The development of immune-related skin toxicities has been associated with greater clinical benefit in patients with lung cancer. When cutaneous toxicity forces to nivolumab suspension, in certain cases, the option of not starting again and closely following up the patient may appear reasonable, even though there are no survival data in this context. Suspension of treatment with close monitoring of these patients until progression may be an alternative, since immune-related skin toxicities could be related to a greater clinical benefit and a durable response to nivolumab.

Update on adjuvant hormonal treatment of early breast cancer.

Clinical trials conducted over the last two decades have demonstrated that 5 years of treatment with tamoxifen (TAM) after local treatment in postmenopausal patients with positive hormone receptor early breast cancer improves disease-free survival and overall survival. More recently, aromatase inhibitors (AI) have been tested in several randomized clinical trials in this setting. The studies have tested either AI versus TAM or different sequential approaches combining the two agents. While the most effective strategy remains to be determined, overall, incorporation of AI resulted in better disease-free survival, particularly in the worst-prognosis subgroup of patients. In addition, long-term treatment with AI was, in general, well tolerated. However, mature results are needed in order to be able to assess the effect in overall survival. The authors of this supplement paper include the key points of roundtable presentations and discussions of hormonal therapy in breast cancer by topic.

Management of patients with metastatic breast cancer.

Hormone treatment is one of the key strategies in the management of metastatic breast cancer. Hormone treatment is one of the key strategies in the management of metastatic breast cancer. Aromatase inhibitors (AI) have been extensively studied in this setting. This section summarizes the key data regarding the use of AI in advanced breast cancer. In postmenopausal women, AI are the first line of treatment for untreated patients, or those who had prior AI treatment and progress after 12 months of adjuvant therapy. A longer disease-free interval and absence of visceral disease is associated with a better response. If tumors recur in less than 12 months, it is recommended that tamoxifen (TAM) or the estrogen-receptor antagonist fulvestrant (FUL) treatment be initiated. In the second-line setting, the best option after progression is the administration of either FUL or TAM. In the third-line setting, reintroduction of AI is considered an acceptable option. In premenopausal women who have not received prior treatment or who have progressed after 12 months following adjuvant treatment, it is recommended to initiate therapy with a combination of TAM and a luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) analog. If there is treatment failure with the use of this combination, megestrol acetate or an LHRH agonist plus an AI may be reasonable alternatives. Intensive research is ongoing to understand the mechanisms of resistance to hormone therapy. In human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 positive-patients, combinations with HER2 antagonists are associated with significant clinical activity.