Minimally invasive operation for esophageal diverticula.

BACKGROUND: Mid and lower esophageal diverticula are rare entities usually managed by open operation. Morbidity can be significant with these complex procedures. This study evaluates our results of minimally invasive surgery for esophageal diverticula. METHODS: Over a 5-year period, 20 patients underwent operation for esophageal diverticula. Median age was 70.5 years. There were 16 epiphrenic and 4 midesophageal diverticula with a median size of 7.5 cm (range, 2-11 cm). Symptoms included dysphagia (14), regurgitation (12), weight loss (8), heartburn (4), aspiration pneumonia (3), chest pain (2), and vomiting (2). Dysphagia scores (1 = none, 5 = severe) were recorded before and after operation. RESULTS: Surgical approaches were laparoscopy (10), video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) (7), laparoscopic/VATS (2), and laparoscopic/thoracotomy (1). The most common operation performed was a diverticulectomy, myotomy, and partial fundoplication (12). Complications occurred in 9 (45%) patients and included 4 (20%) esophageal leaks. Three leak patients had successful outcomes; the fourth patient died 61 days after operation. Median hospital stay was 5.0 (1-61) days. Detailed follow-up was available in 18 patients at a median of 15 (1-70) months. Dysphagia scores improved significantly (p < 0.001) from 2.3 to 1.3 postoperatively. Symptomatic improvement was excellent in 13 (72%), good in 2 (11%), fair in 1 (6%), and poor in 2 (11%) patients. CONCLUSIONS: Minimally invasive operations for esophageal diverticula are feasible but also challenging. The potential for morbidity is significant. Patients should be selected and evaluated carefully before undertaking repair. Open surgery should remain the standard except in centers experienced with minimally invasive esophageal surgery.

Minimally invasive techniques for resection of benign esophageal tumors.

With the emergence of minimally invasive surgery (MIS), laparoscopy and thoracoscopy have become feasible and safe alternatives to open surgical procedures in the management of esophageal leiomyomas. The indications for MIS resection of leiomyomas at our institution include the presence of symptoms, confirmation of pathology to exclude malignancy, tumors greater than 2 cm in size or tumors that show evidence of growth. Our approach of choice is right video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) for tumors of the thoracic esophagus and laparoscopy for tumors of the intra-abdominal esophagus or gastroesophageal junction. A detailed description of these surgical approaches is outlined in the following chapter. At our institution, nine patients, 8 males and 2 females with a mean age of 54 years (range 42-67 years) had a minimally invasive surgical resection of an esophageal leiomyoma between 1995 and 2001. The surgical approaches included right VATS enucleation (6) and laparoscopic enucleation (3). There were no major morbidities, including postoperative leaks or mortalities. The mean hospital stay was 2.3 days. All tumors were benign leiomyomas with average size of 2.73 cm (range 0.9-8 cm) and there was no evidence of recurrence at a mean follow-up of 10 months. Video-assisted enucleation has shown in our institution, as well as in others, that the procedure can be performed safely with low mortality and morbidity. A VATS or laparoscopic approach to the removal of leiomyomas should be the treatment of choice in centers experienced in minimally invasive surgery.