Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Clin Oncol ; 26(32): 5220-6, 2008 Nov 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18838708

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy was adopted for the staging of the axilla with the assumption that it would reduce the risk of lymphedema in women with breast cancer. This study was undertaken to examine patient perceptions of lymphedema and use of precautionary behaviors several years after axillary surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Nine hundred thirty-six women who underwent SLN biopsy (SLNB) alone or SLNB followed by axillary lymph node dissection (SLNB/ALND) between June 1, 1999, and May 30, 2003, were evaluated at a median of 5 years after surgery. Patient-perceived lymphedema and avoidant behaviors were assessed through interview and administered a validated instrument, and compared with arm measurements. RESULTS: Current arm swelling was reported in 3% of patients who received SLNB alone versus 27% of patients who received SLNB/ALND (P < .0001), as compared with 5% and 16%, respectively, with measured lymphedema. Only 41% of patients reporting arm swelling had measured lymphedema, and 5% of patients reporting no arm swelling had measured lymphedema. Risk factors associated with reported arm swelling were greater body weight (P < .0001), higher body mass index (P < .0001), infection (P < .0001), and injury (P = .007) in the ipsilateral arm since surgery. Patients followed more precautions if they had measured or perceived lymphedema. CONCLUSION: Body weight, infection, and injury are significant risk factors for perceiving lymphedema. There is significant discordance between the presence of measured and patient-perceived lymphedema. When compared to SLNB/ALND, SLNB-alone results in a significantly lower rate of patient-perceived arm swelling 5 years postoperatively, and is perceived by fewer women than are measured to have it.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/cirurgia , Excisão de Linfonodo/efeitos adversos , Linfedema/etiologia , Biópsia de Linfonodo Sentinela/efeitos adversos , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Braço , Axila , Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , Feminino , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Humanos , Linfedema/epidemiologia , Linfedema/patologia , Linfedema/prevenção & controle , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Percepção , Prevalência , Estudos Prospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Comportamento de Redução do Risco , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Inquéritos e Questionários , Fatores de Tempo
2.
J Clin Oncol ; 26(32): 5213-9, 2008 Nov 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18838709

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Sentinel lymph node biopsy was adopted for the staging of the axilla with the assumption that it would reduce the risk of lymphedema in women with breast cancer. The aim of this study was to determine the long-term prevalence of lymphedema after SLN biopsy (SLNB) alone and after SLNB followed by axillary lymph node dissection (SLNB/ALND). PATIENTS AND METHODS: At median follow-up of 5 years, lymphedema was assessed in 936 women with clinically node-negative breast cancer who underwent SLNB alone or SLNB/ALND. Standardized ipsilateral and contralateral measurements at baseline and follow-up were used to determine change in ipsilateral upper extremity circumference and to control for baseline asymmetry and weight change. Associations between lymphedema and potential risk factors were examined. RESULTS: Of the 936 women, 600 women (64%) underwent SLNB alone and 336 women (36%) underwent SLNB/ALND. Patients having SLNB alone were older than those having SLNB/ALND (56 v 52 years; P < .0001). Baseline body mass index (BMI) was similar in both groups. Arm circumference measurements documented lymphedema in 5% of SLNB alone patients, compared with 16% of SLNB/ALND patients (P < .0001). Risk factors associated with measured lymphedema were greater body weight (P < .0001), higher BMI (P < .0001), and infection (P < .0001) or injury (P = .02) in the ipsilateral arm since surgery. CONCLUSION: When compared with SLNB/ALND, SLNB alone results in a significantly lower rate of lymphedema 5 years postoperatively. However, even after SLNB alone, there remains a clinically relevant risk of lymphedema. Higher body weight, infection, and injury are significant risk factors for developing lymphedema.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/cirurgia , Excisão de Linfonodo/efeitos adversos , Linfedema/etiologia , Biópsia de Linfonodo Sentinela/efeitos adversos , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Braço , Axila , Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , Feminino , Humanos , Linfedema/epidemiologia , Linfedema/patologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Prevalência , Estudos Prospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Inquéritos e Questionários , Fatores de Tempo
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...