RESUMO
Objective: To systematically review and compare the overall (OS) and disease-free (DFS) survival after hepatic resections for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) of patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) versus other risk factors. Background: Different clinical and tumor characteristics are associated with HCC in the setting of NAFLD in comparison to other risk factors. It is still unclear whether these differences impact patient survival after radical hepatectomies. Methods: Randomized controlled trials and observational studies published in the English literature between July 1980 and June 2020 were searched using multiple databases. Patients' baseline characteristics and the hazard ratios (HRs) of the OS and DFS were extracted and meta-analyses were performed. Results: Fifteen retrospective cohort studies with a total of 7226 patients were included. Among them, 1412 patients (19.5%) had NAFLD and 5814 (80.4%) had other risk factors (eg, viral hepatitis B or C, alcoholic cirrhosis, or cryptogenic cirrhosis). Summary statistics showed that patients with NAFLD had better DFS (HR = 0.81; 95% CI: 0.70-0.94; P = 0.006) and OS (HR = 0.78; 95% CI: 0.67-0.90; P = 0.001) than the control group. Subgroups analyses also indicated that the OS favored NAFLD patients versus patients with viral hepatitis B or C (HR = 0.80; 95% CI: 0.67-0.96; P = 0.017) or alcoholic and cryptogenic cirrhosis (HR = 0.68; 95% CI: 0.47-1.0; P = 0.05). Conclusion: After hepatic resections for HCC, NAFLD patients have better DFS and OS than patients with other risk factors. Subgroup analysis and meta-regression suggested that the survival advantage of NAFLD patients was more pronounced in studies published after 2015 and from Asian centers.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The prevalence of atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients undergoing renal (RT) or liver transplantation (LT) has increased during the last decades. Yet, there is still uncertainty on the association between AF and patient and graft survival. METHODS: Multiple electronic databases were searched using various combinations of keywords and MeSH terms pertinent to the exposure (AF), and outcomes (graft and patient survival). Randomized or quasi-randomized controlled studies, cohort and case-control studies on adults with documented AF undergoing RT or LT were included. The quality of studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Assessment Scale. When appropriate, data on the primary and secondary outcomes were pooled in a meta-analysis using the random-effect model. The Odds ratio was used for patients undergoing LT and the hazard ratio was used for patients who underwent renal transplantation. RESULTS: A total of 50,362 publications were identified. Six studies, with a total of 136,331 patients, satisfied the inclusion criteria. LT was performed on 2861 patients and RT was performed on 133,470 recipients. Overall, AF affected 6652 (4.8%) transplant recipients. Among them, 153 received a LT and 6499 underwent RT. The OR for mortality after LT was 2.375 (95% CI; 1.532-3.682) (Pâ¯=â¯0.000) in AF(+) recipients and the HR was 1.859 (95% CI; 1.031-3.354) (Pâ¯=â¯0.039) after RT. The OR for graft loss in AF(+) after LT r was 1.088 (95% CI; 0.311-3.804) (Pâ¯=â¯0.894) and the HR for graft loss was 1.632 (95% CI; 1.200-2.218) (Pâ¯=â¯0.002) after RT. CONCLUSIONS: To the best of our knowledge, this is the first systematic review and meta-analysis to explore the association between AF and patient and graft survival after RT or LT. Our findings suggest that the presence of AF is associated with inferior patient survival. For renal transplant recipients, AF is also associated with inferior graft survival.