Understanding the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on U.S. older adults: self-reported pandemic-related concerns and consequences in a cross-sectional survey study.

Background and objectives: The purpose of this study was to explore COVID-19 pandemic-related concerns among a racially and ethnically representative sample of older adults in the U.S. Research design and methods: Participants were 501 English-speaking adults 60 years and older recruited online nationally across the U.S. from Amazon Mechanical Turk (mTurk) and Prolific Research Platforms during June of 2020. Data comes from a larger cross-sectional survey. We content analyzed open-ended responses about pandemic-related concerns and observed responses to a checklist of items created by the research team to assess for specific physical, social, and financial consequences experienced due to the pandemic. Results: A majority of the sample (92%) reported at least one pandemic-related concern, with the highest percentage expressing concerns coded as Concern for Others (28%), Physical Health (27%), Socializing (24%), Finance (15%) and Socio-Political-Economic (14%). Participants reported high concern severity (M = 4.03, SD = 1.04) about their concerns mentioned in response to the open-ended concerns question. When prompted with a checklist of items, participants frequently endorsed disruption in social activities as a consequence of the pandemic (83%), disruptions that could impact physical health (45%), and concern over finances as a consequence of the pandemic (41%). Discussion and implications: Older adults most frequently mentioned concerns about the well-being and behavior of others, one's own physical health, and the impacts of the pandemic and social distancing policies on social activities. Findings align with the Socioemotional Selectivity Theory and point to the importance of supporting older adults to maintain meaningful social engagement under conditions of a pandemic and social distancing policies.

A low-intensity behavioral intervention for depression in older adults delivered by lay coaches: proof-of-concept trial.

OBJECTIVES: A broader workforce is necessary to expand U.S. geriatric mental health services. We examined (1) feasibility of training undergraduate students to deliver Do More, Feel Better (DMFB), an evidence-informed program for depression; and (2) feasibility, acceptability, and outcomes in a single-arm proof-of-concept trial. METHOD: In Study 1, we taught DMFB to 18 upper-level undergraduate students and assessed fidelity using role plays. In Study 2, four students delivered six weekly DMFB sessions to 12 community-dwelling older adults (M = 66.83 years old, SD = 10.39) with depression (PHQ ≥ 10). Patient outcomes were change in pre- to post-treatment depressive symptoms, disability, and the target mechanism of increased activity. RESULTS: Fidelity was high in the course (Study 1; 82.4% of role plays rated as 'passing') and the trial (Study 2; 100% of 24 sessions rated as 'passing'). The majority (83.3%) of patients were retained and evidenced statistically and clinically significant improvement in depressive symptoms (Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression [HAM-D]), disability (World Health Organization's Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 [WHODAS 2.0], and activity (Behavioral Activation for Depression Scale [BADS]). CONCLUSION: It is feasible to train bachelor's-level students to deliver a brief, structured intervention for depression. Future research should consider implementation strategies and stakeholder feedback.

Generational Perspectives on Technology's Role in Mental Health Care: A Survey of Adults With Lived Mental Health Experience.

INTRODUCTION: Personal technology (e.g., smartphones, wearable health devices) has been leveraged extensively for mental health purposes, with upwards of 20,000 mobile applications on the market today and has been considered an important implementation strategy to overcome barriers many people face in accessing mental health care. The main question yet to be addressed is the role consumers feel technology should play in their care. One underserved demographic often ignored in this discussion are people over the age of 60. The population of adults 60 and older is predicted to double by 2,050 signaling a need to address how older adults view technology for their mental health care. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to better understand why digital mental health tools are not as broadly adopted as predicted, what role people with lived mental health experience feel technology should play in their care and how those results compare across age groups. METHOD: In a mixed-methods approach, we analyzed results from a one-time cross-sectional survey that included 998 adults aged 18-83 with lived experience of mental health concerns recruited from Prolific, an online research platform. We surveyed participant's use of technology including their perspectives on using technology in conjunction with their mental health care. We asked participants about their previous use of digital mental health tools, their treatment preferences for mental health care, and the role technology should play in their mental health care. RESULTS: Across all age groups, respondents had favorable views of using digital mental health for managing mental health care. However, older adults rated their acceptability of digital mental health tools lower than middle-aged and younger adults. When asked what role technology should play in mental health care in an open-ended response, most participants responded that technology should play a complementary role in mental health care (723/954, 75.8%). CONCLUSION: Digital mental health is seen as a valuable care management tool across all age groups, but preferences for its role in care remain largely administrative and supportive. Future development of digital mental health should reflect these preferences.

Understanding Psychological Distress and Protective Factors Amongst Older Adults During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

OBJECTIVES: This study examined the emotional distress and loneliness during COVID-19 and the roles of resiliency and activities. DESIGN: A cross-sectional national survey. SETTING: Amazon Mechanical Turk (mTurk) and Prolific Research Platforms. PARTICIPANTS: Five hundred and one U.S. dwelling English-speaking adults 60 years old and older. MEASUREMENTS: Participants completed an online survey with the PHQ-9; GAD-7; Short Health Anxiety Inventory; 3-item UCLA Loneliness scale; PROMIS measures of global health, instrumental, and emotional support; 10-item Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale; and COVID-19 needs assessment. RESULTS: Across the sample 13% reported moderate depressive symptoms, 9% reported moderate anxiety symptoms, and 26% endorsed being "lonely." The emotionally distressed group endorsed more loneliness, lower resiliency, less physical exercise, and worse physical health. The low Socio-Economic Status group endorsed less loneliness, less likely to engage in physical exercise and worse physical health.The lonely group endorsed less resilience, less physical exercise, and worse physical health. A multiple logistic regression found that resilience, socioeconomic status, and physical health were significant predictors of loneliness, whereas global health was the best predictor of emotional distress. CONCLUSIONS: Even after prolonged social distancing, older adults in this study did not report greater psychological distress compared to earlier studies of older adults during COVID-19. Older adults with lower SES, worse physical health, and less resiliency, were more likely to report more loneliness. It is this group that should be the focus of intervention.