Using a high-flow nasal cannula provides superior results to OxyMask delivery in moderate to severe bronchiolitis: a randomized controlled study.

The effectiveness of using a face mask with a small diffuser for oxygen delivery (OxyMask) was compared to use of a high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) in patients with moderate or severe bronchiolitis.The study population in this open, phase 4, randomized controlled trial consisted of 60 patients aged 1-24 months diagnosed with moderate or severe bronchiolitis and admitted to an intensive care unit (ICU) for oxygen therapy. The patients were randomized into two groups according to the method of oxygen delivery: a diffuser mask group and an HFNC group.There were seven failures in the mask group and none in the HFNC group. The survival probability differed significantly between the two treatment methods (p = 0.009).Time to weaning off oxygen therapy was 56 h in the HFNC group and 96 h in the mask group (p < 0.001).Conclusion: HFNC use decreased the treatment failure rate and the duration of both oxygen therapy and ICU treatment compared to the diffuser mask, which implies that an HFNC should be the first choice for treating patients admitted to the ICU with severe bronchiolitis. What is known: • A high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) does not significantly reduce the time on oxygen compared to standard therapy in children with moderate to severe bronchiolitis. Observational studies show that, since the introduction of HFNC, fewer children with bronchiolitis need intubation. For children with moderate to severe bronchiolitis there is no proof of its benefit. What Is New: • In children with moderate to severe bronchiolitis, HFNC provides faster and more effective improvement than can be achieved with a diffuser mask.

Evaluation of Microorganisms Causing Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia in a Pediatric Intensive Care Unit.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to identify microorganisms causing ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) and also study the antibiotic resistance/susceptibility. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively assessed microorganisms isolated from patients diagnosed with VAP in a pediatric intensive care unit between January 1, 2014, and June 30, 2016. RESULTS: We included 44 patients diagnosed with VAP. The prevalence thereof was 8.6 patients per 1,000 ventilator days. Mechanical ventilation was required for 56.5% of patients. Thirty-three patients (75%) died. An underlying chronic disease was detected in 75% of patients (n=33). Fifty microorganisms were isolated from 44 patients. Single microorganisms were isolated from 86.4% (n=38) and two from 13.6% (n=6) of patients. Of all the isolated bacteria, 96% (n=48) were gram-negative; the most common was Pseudomonas aeruginosa (32%), followed by Klebsiella pneumoniae (24%) and Acinetobacter baumannii (22%). The isolates were most susceptible to colistin (92.6%), followed by piperacillin-tazobactam (71.4%), amikacin (65.2%), and gentamicin (52.2%). No enterobacterium or Acinetobacter strain was resistant to colistin; however, 13% of P. aeruginosa isolates were resistant. CONCLUSION: In VAP, it is essential to catalog antibiotic resistance patterns of bacteria present in the unit to ensure that empirical antibiotic therapy is effective.

Awareness and attitude relating to the human papilloma virus and its vaccines among pediatrics, obstetrics and gynecology specialists in Turkey.

BACKGROUND: To determine the level of knowledge on human papillomavirus (HPV) infection and vaccination, and the attitude towards HPV vaccination in pediatricians, obstetricians and gynecologists (OBG). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Participants were administered a 40-question survey, investigating the demographic properties, the knowledge on the HPV infection-vaccination and attitudes towards vaccination. RESULTS: The study enrolled a total of 228 participants (131 pediatricians and 97 OBGs). At a rate of 99.6%, the participants agreed with the fact that the HPV infection was the most common sexually transmitted disease and 33.8% of the participants had the opinion that the HPV vaccination should be administered only in women. The lowest level of HPV vaccine recommendation was among the pediatrics specialists (59.4%, p=0.012). When asked whether they would have their daughters receive HPV vaccination, 79.5% of the participants answered favorably; this rate was 36.7% for the sons. At a rate of 59.5% of the participants thought that the HPV vaccine needed to be included in the national vaccine schedule. Most of the participants (91.6%) had the idea that reduction of the vaccine costs would increase the vaccination frequency. CONCLUSIONS: We observed that the consideration of the costs and the prejudices relating to the inefficacy of vaccination as well as the inadequate level of knowledge were involved in the physicians' resistance to HPV vaccination. We believe that the healthcare professionals should be informed adequately to overcome false beliefs, thereby ensuring success of the HPV vaccine upon inclusion in the national vaccine schedule in the future.