Aortic Graft Mycotic Pseudoaneurysm as a Severe Complication After Multivisceral Transplantation: A Case Report.

BACKGROUND: Surgical complications in multivisceral transplantation (MVT) are frequent and always severe. Those related to technical issues are relevant as they have implications not only on the graft but also on patient survival. The aim of this study was to review our case-based data and experience with 5 MVT performed since December 2004. CASE REPORT: A 38 year-old woman presented with ultra-short bowel syndrome due to massive ischemia also affecting the celiac trunk. She also had moderate to severe hepatitis/steatosis with some degree of fibrosis on liver biopsy, due to long-term home parenteral nutrition (HPN). An MVT was carried out in September 2010 including the liver, stomach, pancreatoduodenal complex with the spleen, and small bowel. The postoperative course was complicated by a leak from the pyloromiotomy, requiring reoperation on postoperative day 13. She also had central line catheter infection and renal impairment, requiring renal replacement therapy, and was discharged on postoperative day 150. Fifteen days later she was hospitalized because of severe abdominal pain associated with an abdominal mass. Computed tomography showed an aortic donor graft pseudoaneurysm, so we decided to operate on the patient. A complete resection of the pseudoaneurysm using an interposed polytetrafluoroethylene graft was performed. Six months after the MVT, the patient died due to sepsis, despite a functional graft and complete digestive autonomy. CONCLUSIONS: Although this complication is rare, surgical complications in MVT are severe and may seriously impair graft and patient survival.

Disseminated nocardiosis: a rare infectious complication following non-heart-beating donor liver transplantation.

Nocardiosis is an infrequent disease that affects patients who display a cellular immunodeficiency, such as transplant recipients on immunosuppressive treatment, but uncommonly associated with high morbidity and mortality rates. Disseminated Nocardiosis affecting the central nervous system (CNS), abdomen, skin, and lungs has been described in bone marrow, lung, and kidney transplant recipients. However, to our knowledge, no cases involving all of these structures have been reported in liver transplant recipients. Herein, we have reported a case of CNS, pulmonary, and cutaneous nocardiosis in a liver transplant recipient who experienced hepatitis C virus-related cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma and received the organ from a non-heart-beating donor. At posttransplantation month 7 the patient was admitted to the emergency department with poor general health status, fever, edema, and subcutaneous nodules in the legs. A computed tomography scan revealed multiple nodules disseminated through both lungs, abdomen, brain, and subcutaneous tissue. A needle biopsy was performed into one of the subcutaneous nodules. Cultures of the material tested positive for Nocardia farcinica. Thus, we started treatment with intravenous sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim (SMZ-TMP), shifting after 1 month to oral therapy. Radiological examination performed after 2 weeks of treatment showed a 70% reduction in subcutaneous, pulmonary, and cerebral lesions. After 6 months of SMZ-TMP treatment, the patient remained free of the symptoms with involution of the subcutaneous nodules and significant radiological improvement. Among opportunistic infections appearing in liver transplant recipients, Nocardia species should have special consideration according to the success of early treatment and the bad prognosis in cases of delayed diagnosis.

[Use and abuse of intravenous catheters in conventional hospital wards]. / Uso y abuso de los catéteres intravenosos en las plantas de hospitalizacion convencional.

BACKGROUND: Information regarding the use intravenous catheters (IVC) in conventional hospital units and its consequence in terms of intravenous catéter-related bacteremia (ICRB) is scarce. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the use of IVC in patients admitted in conventional wards of a general hospital and to measure IVCRB incidence in such patients. METHODS: We evaluated during one week IVC use in adult patients admitted in 12 de Octubre Hospital and we calculated la incidence density of ICRB. RESULTS: We evaluated the clinical charts of 731 patients (284 from medical wards and 447 from surgical wards), of which 338 (46.2%) had a peripheral VC inserted and 63 (8.6%) a central IVC. Central IVC had been inserted for a mean time 11.5 days globally (CI 95% 5.57-17.42), being 28.3 in medical wards and 8.32 days in surgical wards (p = 0.2). In 27.7 % of the patients with IVC intravenous antimicrobials was the only reason for the use of such catheters in spite of adequate oral tolerance in 30 % of the patients with central IVC an specific note explaining the reason for implanting such catheter was lacking in the clinical chart. IVCRB was detected in 12/401 patients (3%). The incidence density of IVCRB in central IVC was 8.28 per 1000 catheter-days. CONCLUSIONS: There are some aspects that could be clearly improved regarding the prevention of IVCRB, mostly in the indications, the excess of time those catheters are kept implanted and in the lost chances for catheter withdrawal when switch-therapy could be performed.

Uso y abuso de los catéteres intravenosos en las plantas de hospitalizacion convencional / Use and abuse of intravenous catheters in convetntional hospitals wards

Antecedentes: Existe escasa información acerca del uso de catéteres venosos (CVs) en unidades de hospitalización convencionales y la incidencia bacteriemia relacionada con catéteres venosos (BRCV) en dichas unidades. Objetivos: Evaluar el uso de catéteres venosos (CVs) en pacientes ingresados en plantas convencionales de un hospital general y las consecuencias en términos de BRCV. Métodos: Se evaluó durante una semana el uso de catéteres venosos y la densidad de incidencia de BRCV en pacientes adultos ingresados en los servicios de hospitalización del hospital 12 de Octubre de Madrid. Resultados: Se analizaron las historias clínicas de 731 pacientes (284 en servicios médicos y 447 en servicios quirúrgicos), de los cuales 338 (46,2%) eran portadores en ese momento de un CV periférico y 63 (8,6%) de un CV central. La media de días de colocación de un CV central fue globalmente de 11,5 (IC 95% 5,57-17,42), 28,3 en los servicios médicos días y 8,32 en los servicios quirúrgicos (p = 0,2). En el 27,7% de los pacientes con CVs la única indicación para el uso de un CV fue la administración intravenosa de antibióticos a pesar de que el paciente toleraba por vía oral y en un 30% de las ocasiones no había ninguna especificación en la historia que permitiera aclarar cuál era la indicación para la colocación del CV. Se detectó BRCV en 12/401 pacientes (3%). La densidad de incidencia de BRC en CV centrales fue de 8,28 por cada 1.000 días de catéter. Conclusiones: Existen claros aspectos que deben mejorarse en cuanto a la prevención de la BRC, fundamentalmente respecto al ajuste de las indicaciones, el tiempo que permanecen los catéteres centrales implantados y, sobre todo, en cuanto a las oportunidades perdidas de retirar el catéter secuenciando la medicación a vía oral

Background: Information regarding the use intravenous catheters (IVC) in conventional hospital units and its consequence in terms of intravenous catéter-related bacteremia (ICRB) is scarce. Objectives: To evaluate the use of IVC in patients admitted in conventional wards of a general hospital and to measure IVCRB incidence in such patients. Methods: We evaluated during one week IVC use in adult patients admitted in 12 de Octubre Hospital and we calculated la incidence densitity of ICRB. Results: We evaluated the clinical charts of 731 patients (284 from medical wards and 447 from surgical wards), of which 338 (46.2%) had a peripheral VC inserted and 63 (8.6%) a central IVC. Central IVC had been inserted for a mean time 11.5 days globally (CI 95% 5.57-17.42), being 28.3 in medical wards and 8.32 days in surgical wards (p=0.2). In 27.7 % of the patients with IVC intravenous antimicrobials was the only reason for the use of such catheters in spite of adequate oral tolerance in 30 % of the patients with central IVC an specific note explaining the reason for implanting such catheter was lacking in the clinical chart. IVCRB was detected in 12/401 patients (3%). The incidence density of IVCRB in central IVC was 8.28 per 1000 catheter-days. Conclusions: There are some aspects that could be clearly improved regarding the prevention of IVCRB, mostly in the indications, the excess of time those catheters are kept implanted and in the lost chances for catheter withdrawal when switch-therapy could be performed