PRECISE Scale: a quantitative classification for androgenetic alopecia and its application to hair transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Androgenetic alopecia (AGA) is a prevalent genetic condition that can affect both male and female, and is considered the most frequent form of hair loss. Traditional scales and methods of classifying AGA are basically qualitative. OBJECTIVE: This work aims to propose a quantitative scale to classify AGA in order to assist hair transplantation surgery. METHODS: Based on whole hairless and thinning areas that needs to receive follicular units in a hair transplantation procedure, basic equations to support the scale are proposed. Additionally, the study involves simulations that apply the classification system and compare its results with those of qualitative methods. RESULTS: The PRECISE scale utilizes a range of 0-10, using 30 cm2 as the measured standard of a bald area. For hair transplantation, 1500 follicular units (FU) are recommended for each score in the PRECISE scale. Technological and manual methods to measure the hairless and thinning areas are presented and discussed. This new quantitative classification, combined with different and complementary methods of measurement of hairless and thinning areas endorse the understanding of the clinical condition by the patient and the planning of a surgery procedure. CONCLUSION: The developed PRECISE scale brings a different way of classifying Androgenetic alopecia (AGA), through an essentially quantitative evaluation. It can be used to elaborate the best strategy for the hair transplantation surgery and to improve the outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE V: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these evidence-based medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer at Critical Facial Sites: Results and Strategies of the Surgical Treatment of 102 Patients.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the surgical treatment results of a consecutive series of patients with nonmelanoma skin cancer in critical facial regions such as the nose, lip, eyelid, ear, forehead, cheek, and chin. METHODS: This was a prospective observational cohort study evaluating the surgical treatment results of 102 patients with nonmelanoma skin cancer who underwent surgical excision and required some type of reconstruction. The reconstruction strategy used, histological type and margins, aesthetic result, and complications were evaluated. RESULTS: The most common facial site was the nose (48.01%), followed by the eyelid, ear, cheek, forehead, and lip. The most frequently used type of reconstruction was the advancement flap (30.39%), followed by transposition flap (27,45%), rotation flap (14.70%), and grafts (10.78%). Basal cell carcinoma was the most frequent histological type, accounting for 90.19% of the sample, with 54.90% of these cases being of the nodular subtype. Disease-free margins were obtained in 94.11% of the patients, and only one patient presented compromised margins and underwent marginal extension. A good cosmetic result was found in 93.13% of the participants. CONCLUSION: Surgical treatment can provide excellent oncological, functional, and cosmetic results in the treatment of patients with nonmelanoma skin cancer at critical facial sites.