Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Am J Cardiol ; 203: 55-63, 2023 09 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37481813

RESUMO

Renal transplant (RT) recipients are susceptible to infections because of immunosuppression. The literature regarding the epidemiology and outcomes of infective endocarditis (IE) in RT recipients is limited. We analyzed the National Inpatient Sample in the United States to study IE in RT and identify risk factors for inpatient mortality and IE development in RT patients. All patients ≥18 years who had IE with and without RT between 2007 and 2019 were identified from the National Inpatient Sample. The demographics, co-morbidities, length of stay, hospital costs, and mortality of IE patients with RT were compared with IE patients without RT. Predictors of inpatient mortality for RT recipients with IE were analyzed. Between 2007 and 2019, there were 777,245 hospitalizations for IE, of which 3,782 had RT. The IE in RT cohort was younger than the general IE population and had higher proportions of males, non-White races, and Hispanic ethnicity, and higher burden of co-morbidities, but similar inpatient mortality rates. On multivariate analysis, Staphylococcal IE (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.26, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.2 to 4.3, p = 0.015), stroke (aOR 6.4, 95% CI 2.7 to 15.3, p <0.001), anemia (aOR 2.3, 95% CI 1.3 to 4.0, p = 0.004), and shock (aOR 6.3, 95% CI 3.3 to 11.9, p <0.001) were associated with greater inpatient mortality, whereas Streptococcal endocarditis (aOR 0.37, 95% CI 0.1 to 0.9, p = 0.038) was associated with lower inpatient mortality. In conclusion, RT patients with IE were younger and had more severe co-morbidities compared with IE patients without RT. Staphylococcal IE, presence of shock and stroke worsened the prognosis in these patients.


Assuntos
Endocardite Bacteriana , Endocardite , Transplante de Rim , Infecções Estafilocócicas , Masculino , Humanos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Pacientes Internados , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Endocardite Bacteriana/epidemiologia , Infecções Estafilocócicas/epidemiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos
2.
Ther Adv Chronic Dis ; 13: 20406223221086760, 2022.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35432847

RESUMO

Barrett's esophagus (BE), a precursor for esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC), is defined as salmon-colored mucosa extending more than 1 cm proximal to the gastroesophageal junction with histological evidence of intestinal metaplasia. The actual risk of EAC in nondysplastic Barrett's esophagus (NDBE) is low with an annual incidence of 0.3%. The mainstay in the management of NDBE is control of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) along with enrollment in surveillance programs. The current recommendation for surveillance is four-quadrant biopsies every 2 cm (or 1 cm in known or suspected dysplasia) followed by biopsy of mucosal irregularity (nodules, ulcers, or other visible lesions) performed at 3- to 5-year intervals. Challenges to surveillance include missed cancers, suboptimal adherence to surveillance guidelines, and lack of strong evidence for efficacy. There is minimal role for endoscopic eradication therapy in NDBE. The role for enhanced imaging techniques, artificial intelligence, and risk prediction models using clinical data and molecular markers is evolving.

3.
Therap Adv Gastroenterol ; 14: 17562848211033730, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34434254

RESUMO

There has been a dramatic increase in the incidence of Barrett's esophagus and esophageal adenocarcinoma over the past several decades with a continued rise expected in the future. Several strategies have been developed for screening and surveillance of patients with Barrett's esophagus and endoscopic treatment of Barrett's associated dysplasia and early esophageal cancer; however, they have not made a substantial impact on the incidence of cancer. Herein, chemoprevention becomes an attractive idea for reducing the incidence of cancer in Barrett's patients. Several agents appear promising in preclinical and observational studies but very few have been evaluated in randomized controlled trials. Strongest evidence to date is available for proton-pump inhibitors and Aspirin that have been evaluated in a large randomized controlled trial. Other agents such as statins, metformin, ursodeoxycholic acid, and dietary supplements have insufficient evidence for chemoprevention in Barrett's patients.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...