Obstetric and perinatal outcome in women with twin pregnancy and gestational diabetes.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate pregnancy complications and obstetric and perinatal outcomes in women with twin pregnancy and GDM. STUD DESIGN: An observational multicentre retrospective study was performed and 534 pregnant woman and 1068 twins infants allocated into two groups, 257 with GDM and 277 controls, were studied. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Pregnant women characteristics, hypertensive complications, preterm delivery rate, mode of delivery and birthweight were analysed. RESULTS: Pregnant women with GDM were older (p < 0.001) and had higher body mass index (p < 0.001) than controls. GDM was associated with higher risk of prematurity in twin pregnancy (odds ratio 1.64, 95% confidence interval [1.14-2.32], p = 0.005). This association was based on the association with other pregnancy complications. Birthweight Z-scores were significantly higher in the GDM group (p = 0.02). The rate of macrosomia was higher in the GDM group (p = 0.002) and small for gestational age (SGA) babies were significantly less frequent (p = 0.03). GDM was an independent predictor of macrosomia (p = 0.006). CONCLUSION: The presence of GDM in twin pregnancy was associated with a higher risk of hypertensive complications, prematurity and macrosomia, but significantly reduces the risk of SGA infants. Prematurity was related to the presence of other associated pregnancy complications.

Prenatal covering of the spinal cord decreases neurologic sequelae in a myelomeningocele model.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Recent experience in fetal surgery to correct myelomeningocele in humans reports an early reversion of hydrocephalus and decreased need of ventricular shunting in the first months of life; however, it has not been possible to demonstrate benefit in lower extremity function. In the present work, we have tried to ascertain the impact of cord exposure on hind limb function. METHODS: Fetal rabbits with myelomeningocele (group M), treated myelomeningocele (group T), and control animals (group C) were compared at birth regarding physical examination, somatosensory-evoked potentials of the hind limbs, ventricular morphometry, and spine histology. RESULTS: No major difference was found between groups M and T in the physical examination. Somatosensory-evoked potentials of the hind limbs were absent in group M and present in group T, although showing a longer latency period and decreased amplitude than controls. The area of the third ventricle was significantly larger in group M than in group C; in group T, it was also somewhat larger but not significantly so. Cord histology had evident changes in group M and minor changes in group T, which resembled normal group C cord. CONCLUSIONS: Prenatal covering of the spinal cord prevents central and peripheral neurologic deterioration in this animal model of myelomeningocele.