High rate of biological removal of sulfate, organic matter, and metals in UASB reactor to treat synthetic acid mine drainage and cheese whey wastewater as carbon source.

The anaerobic biological treatment of sulfate-rich effluents, such as acid mine drainage (AMD), is mediated by sulfate-reducing bacteria (SRB). This process involves the reduction of sulfates in the presence of an electron donor. Complex carbon compounds can be used as electron donors. In the present study, was used an upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) reactor to co-treat a low-pH synthetic AMD and cheese whey wastewater (CWW). Were observed higher sulfate and COD removal rates (1,114 ± 88 and 1,214 ± 128 mg L-1  day-1 , respectively) at higher sulfate and applied COD loading rates (1,500 mg L-1  day-1 ). The overall pH of the effluent remained above 6.4 without any bicarbonate supplementation. Almost 100% of the Fe, Zn, and Cu was removed and the presence of metals improved the process. The use of a single reactor to treat AMD and CWW is promising. PRACTITIONER POINTS: Wastewater cheese whey was electron donor for treating acid mine drainage in an UASB reactor. Metals additions in the system indicated an increased removal of COD. About 99% of the metals were removed with the treatment.

The effect of acidic pH and presence of metals as parameters in establishing a sulfidogenic process in anaerobic reactor.

The successful use of anaerobic reactors for bioremediation of acid mine drainage has been shown in systems with neutral pH. However, the choice of an efficient and suitable process for such wastewater must consider the capability of operating at acidic pH and in the presence of metals. This work studies the performance of an anaerobic batch reactor, under conditions of varying initial pH for its efficiencies in sulfate removal and metal precipitation from synthetic acid mine drainage. The chemical oxygen demand/sulfate (COD/SO4(2-)) ratio used was 1.00, with ethanol chosen as the only energy and carbon source. The initial pH of the synthetic drainage was progressively set from 7.0 to 4.0 to make it as close as possible to that of real acid mine drainage. Metals were also added starting with iron, zinc, and finally copper. The effectiveness of sulfate and COD removal from the synthetic acid mine drainage increased as the initial pH was reduced. The sulfate removal increased from 38.5 ± 3.7% to 52.2 ± 3%, while the removal of organic matter started at 91.7 ± 2.4% and ended at 99 ± 1%. These results indicate that the sulfate reducing bacteria (SRB) community adapted to lower pH values. The metal removal observed was 88 ± 7% for iron, 98.0 ± 0.5% for zinc and 99 ± 1% for copper. At this stage, an increase in the sulfate removal was observed, which reaches up to 82.2 ± 5.8%. The kinetic parameters for sulfate removal were 0.22 ± 0.04 h(-1) with Fe, 0.26 ± 0.04 h(-1) with Fe and Zn and 0.44 ± 0.04 h(-1) with Fe, Zn, and Cu.