Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Lasers Surg Med ; 46(2): 127-31, 2014 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24375476

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The plasma skin regeneration (PSR) device delivers thermal energy to the skin by converting nitrogen gas to plasma. Prior to treatment, hydration of the skin is recommended as it is thought to limit the zone of thermal damage. However, there is limited data on optimal hydration time. This pilot study aims to determine the effect of topical anesthetic application time on the depth of thermal injury from a PSR device using histology. STUDY DESIGN/MATERIALS AND METHODS: PSR (1.8 and 3.5 J) was performed after 0, 30, or 60 minutes of topical anesthetic application. Rhytidectomy was then performed and skin was fixed for histologic analysis. Four patients (two control and four treatment sites per patient) undergoing rhytidectomy were recruited for the study. Each patient served as his/her own control (no hydration). A scoring system for tissue injury was developed. Epidermal injury, the presence of vacuolization, blistering, damage to adnexal structures, and depth of dermal collagen changes were evaluated in over 1,400 high-power microscopy fields. RESULTS: There was a significant difference in the average thermal injury score, depth of thermal damage, and epidermal injury when comparing controls to 30 minutes of hydration (P = 0.012, 0.012, 0.017, respectively). There was no statistical difference between controls and 60 minutes of hydration or between 30 and 60 minutes of hydration. Epidermal vacuolization at low energy and patchy distribution of thermal injury was also observed. CONCLUSION: Topical hydration influences the amount of thermal damage when applied to skin for 30 minutes prior to treatment with the PSR device. There was a trend toward decreasing thermal damage at 60 minutes, and there was no difference between treatment for 30 or 60 minutes. The data suggest that application of topical anesthetic for a short period of time prior to treatment with the PSR device is cost-effective, safe, and may be clinically beneficial.


Assuntos
Anestésicos Locais/uso terapêutico , Queimaduras/prevenção & controle , Temperatura Alta/efeitos adversos , Regeneração da Pele por Plasma/efeitos adversos , Pele/lesões , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Benzocaína/uso terapêutico , Queimaduras/etiologia , Combinação de Medicamentos , Feminino , Humanos , Lidocaína/uso terapêutico , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Projetos Piloto , Regeneração da Pele por Plasma/instrumentação , Ritidoplastia , Método Simples-Cego , Pele/patologia , Tetracaína/uso terapêutico , Fatores de Tempo , Adulto Jovem
2.
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg ; 138(5): 641-7, 2008 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18439472

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Demonstrate that bacterial biofilm in sinus mucosal samples from patients with eosinophilic mucin chronic rhinosinusitis (EMCRS) and allergic fungal rhinosinusitis (AFRS) contains fungal elements; identify specific organisms in the biofilm. METHODS: Mucosa samples from 11 patients undergoing sinus surgery were collected. Patients were classified as having AFRS, EMCRS, or chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) based on histopathologic findings. Three mucosal samples from controls were also collected. Samples were stained with specific bacterial fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) DNA probes (Haemophilus influenzae, Streptococcus pneumophilia, Staphylococcus aureus, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa) and a general pan-fungal FISH probe. The samples were analyzed for bacterial biofilm ultrastructure and fungal elements using epifluorescent microscopy. RESULTS: Bacterial biofilm was demonstrated in 9/11 samples and 2/3 controls. H. influenzae was the predominant biofilm present. There was a trend showing more fungal elements in AFRS and EMCRS biofilms than in CRS and controls. CONCLUSION: This is a preliminary study demonstrating fungal elements within sinus mucosal biofilm and demonstrating biofilm in AFRS.


Assuntos
Bactérias/isolamento & purificação , Biofilmes , Fungos/isolamento & purificação , Rinite/microbiologia , Sinusite/microbiologia , Doença Crônica , Humanos , Estudos Prospectivos
3.
Ear Nose Throat J ; 86(5): 287-9, 294, 2007 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17580809

RESUMO

Malignant melanoma of the sinonasal cavity is an uncommon disease, and therefore a limited amount of data exists regarding its optimal treatment. The course of the disease is highly variable. Individual survival is also highly variable, but the overall prognosis is poor; probably because patients generally present at a late stage and because the disease has a proclivity for distant dissemination. We describe 2 recent cases of primary malignant melanoma of the sinonasal mucosa, and we review the literature.


Assuntos
Melanoma/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Nasais/diagnóstico , Neoplasias dos Seios Paranasais/diagnóstico , Idoso , Antígenos de Neoplasias , Evolução Fatal , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Melaninas/metabolismo , Melanoma/metabolismo , Melanoma/cirurgia , Antígenos Específicos de Melanoma , Proteínas de Neoplasias/metabolismo , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/cirurgia , Neoplasias Nasais/metabolismo , Neoplasias Nasais/cirurgia , Neoplasias dos Seios Paranasais/metabolismo , Neoplasias dos Seios Paranasais/cirurgia , Radiografia , Mucosa Respiratória/diagnóstico por imagem , Mucosa Respiratória/metabolismo , Mucosa Respiratória/patologia , Mucosa Respiratória/cirurgia , Proteínas S100/metabolismo
4.
Laryngoscope ; 116(7): 1121-6, 2006 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16826045

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is a common disease poorly controlled by antibiotics. Postulated etiologies of CRS include allergy, fungi, functional factors, and biofilm. OBJECTIVES: We presented a preliminary study demonstrating bacterial biofilms' presence on the sinus mucosa of patients with CRS using fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH). The advantage of FISH in biofilm identification is that it is the only method that identifies the specific bacteria creating the biofilm matrix. We now present the results of a larger series of patients. METHODS: Patients with CRS scheduled for sinus surgery were enrolled in the study. Biopsies of the sinus mucosa and cultures were taken at the time of surgery. Control samples were taken from patients undergoing septoplasty. Specimens underwent FISH testing for Streptococcus pneumoniae, Staphylococcus aureus, Haemophilus influenza, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. RESULTS: Bacterial biofilms were present on 14 of 18 specimens. The predominant species were H. influenzae, S. pneumoniae, and S. aureus. P. aeruginosa biofilm was not identified on any specimens. The intraoperative cultures of the planktonic bacteria present in the sinuses did not correlate with the biofilms identified. Two of the five control samples were positive for biofilm. CONCLUSION: The presence of biofilms on the mucosa of patients with CRS offers a possible cause of antimicrobial therapy failure and could change the approach to treatment. However, the presence of biofilms on healthy control samples implies that biofilms may simply be colonizers. The precise role that biofilms play in CRS still remains to be determined. Further studies with larger sample sizes are needed.


Assuntos
Biofilmes , Seio Etmoidal , Mucosa Respiratória/microbiologia , Rinite/microbiologia , Sinusite/microbiologia , Doença Crônica , DNA Bacteriano/análise , Humanos , Hibridização in Situ Fluorescente , Estudos Prospectivos , Mucosa Respiratória/patologia , Rinite/complicações , Rinite/patologia , Sinusite/complicações , Sinusite/patologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...