Comparative Study of the Management of Intertrochanteric Fracture Femur With Proximal Femoral Nail vs. the Dynamic Hipscrew With Derotation Screw in Elderly Population.

BACKGROUND: Intertrochanteric fractures can be treated, both by conservative and operative methods depending upon the status of the patient. The purpose of this study was to assess the functional outcome of intertrochanteric fracture of femur treated with dynamic hip screw (DHS) with de-rotation screw comparing and proximal femoral nail (PFN). METHODOLOGY: We compared 30 (male: 23, female: seven) cases of intertrochanteric fractures with a mean age of the population was 65 years and male to female ratio in was 2.75:1. Patients were recruited in this study having inclusion criteria of adults above 50 years of age, isolated intertrochanteric fractures of the AO Foundation/Orthopaedic Trauma Association (AO/OTA) type A1 and A2, fracture less than two weeks, and intertrochanteric fracture with or without distal extension. RESULTS: Post-operatively, patients treated by either of these two methods were statistically analyzed in terms of comparing advantages and disadvantages in terms of the time of fracture union and outcome of both above-mentioned procedures using Harris hip score. CONCLUSION: PFN gives better results than DHS with De-Rotation Screw-in intertrochanteric fractures in terms of the amount of blood loss during surgery, duration of surgery, early toe-touch weight-bearing, and Harris hip scores. There is no difference between the two modalities in terms of duration of hospitalization, fracture union, mortality and morbidity, and postoperative complications.

Telemedicine Versus In-Person Visits in Postoperative Care in Orthopedic Patients: Follow-Up Study From North India.

BACKGROUND: Telemedicine is improving healthcare delivery in orthopedic patients but the data regarding this are scarce from India, especially North India. METHODOLOGY: During this one-year prospective observational study, all patients with fractures of the upper end of tibia requiring surgical intervention and who consented to avail teleconsultation services were included. All these patients were assessed by patient satisfaction score pre-operatively. Patients were randomly assigned for post-operative care schedules of 5 and 14 days in telemedicine and inpatient visits during their follow-up period. RESULTS: A total of 50 patients were included and the satisfaction rating among the two groups was identical. The average patient satisfaction score (on a 10-point scale) was found to be 9.77 in the inpatient visits based on the one-on-one follow-up group and 9.79 in the telemedicine consultation group. CONCLUSION:  In orthopedics, the implementation of telemedicine can minimize the need for the patient to physically visit the outpatient department. The rates of response and overall patient satisfaction were high in the telemedicine group. However, more efforts should be made to address the limitations and problems of using telemedicine.