RESUMO
At the beginning of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, transfusion of COVID-19 convalescent plasma (CCP) was considered as one of the possibilities to help severe patients to overcome COVID-19 disease. The use of CCP has been controversial as its effectiveness depends on many variables from the plasma donor and the COVID-19 patient, for example, time of convalescence or symptoms onset. This was a feasibility study assessing the safety of multiple doses of CCP in mechanically ventilated intubated patients with respiratory failure due to COVID-19. Thirty (30) patients with severe respiratory failure, in ICU, with invasive mechanical ventilation received up to 5 doses of 300 to 600 ml of CP on alternate days (0,2,4,6 and 8) until extubation, futility, or death. Nineteen patients received five doses, seven received four, and four had 2 or 3 doses. On day 28 of follow-up, 57% of patients recovered and were at home and the long-term mortality observed was 27%. The ten severe adverse events reported in the study were unrelated to CCP transfusion. This study suggests that transfusion of multiple doses of convalescent plasma (CP) is safe. This strategy may represent an option to use in new studies, given the potential benefit of CCP transfusions in the early stage of infection in unvaccinated populations and in settings where monoclonal antibodies or antivirals are contraindicated or not available. Summary boxO_LITransfusion of multiple doses (up to 5 doses) of 300-600 ml of convalescent plasma from COVID-19 recovered patients is safe as it does not induce more severe effects than a single dose. C_LIO_LIIndependent of the number of transfused doses, most patients had detectable levels of total and neutralizing antibodies in plasma. C_LIO_LIFuture studies are needed to determine if multiple transfusion doses are more efficient in preventing severity than a single dose. C_LI
RESUMO
BackgroundEarly in the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, many national public health authorities implemented non-pharmaceutical interventions to mitigate disease outbreaks. Panama established mandatory mask use two months after its first documented case. Initial compliance was high, but diverse masks were used in public areas. We studied behavioral dynamics of mask use through the first two COVID waves in Panama, to improve implementation of effective, low-cost public health containment measures, when populations are exposed to novel air-borne pathogens. MethodsMask use behavior was recorded from pedestrians in four Panamanian populations (August to December 2020). We recorded facial coverings; and if used, the type of mask, and gender and estimated age of the wearer. FindingsPeople were highly compliant (> 95%) with mask mandates, and demonstrated important population-level behaviours: 1) decreasing use of cloth masks over time, and increasing use of surgical masks; 2) mask use was 3-fold lower in sub-urban neighborhoods than other public areas; and 3) young people were least likely to wear masks. InterpretationResults help focus highly-effective, low-cost, public health interventions for managing and controlling a pandemic. Considerations of behavioural preferences for different masks, relative to pricing and availability, are essential for optimizing public health policies. Policies to increase availability of effective masks, and behavioral nudges to increase acceptance, and to facilitate mask usage, during the on-going SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, and for future pandemics of respiratory pathogens, are key tools, especially for nations lagging in access to expensive vaccines and pharmacological approaches. Funding11-2020 SNI Grant, SENACYT.
