Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Injury ; 43(2): 180-3, 2012 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21696725

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Splenectomy impairs the ability to combat infection, especially with encapsulated organisms. However, there is limited understanding of the impact of splenic arterial embolisation on immune function. Our hypothesis was that embolisation would not impair systemic immune function. This study examines elements of cellular and humoral immunity in patients undergoing splenic embolisation or splenectomy for trauma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Splenic embolisation (SE) and splenectomy patients (S) were compared to blunt trauma patients without splenic injury (NS). Lymphocyte counts, natural-killer cells, serum complement (C3, C4), and properdin levels were assayed. RESULTS: No significant differences in total, helper, or suppressor T-lymphocytes, complement (C3, C4), or properdin were found. B-lymphocyte counts were higher in S (602±445cells/mm(3)) than SE (238±114cells/mm(3)) or NS (293±153cells/mm(3)) (p=.003 for pairwise comparisons). S also had more natural killer T-cells than NS (325±170cells/mm(3) vs. 174±116cells/mm(3), p=.004). CONCLUSION: Splenic embolisation does not alter the measured immunologic parameters. The absence of sensitive markers for splenic immune function limits the ability to assess the impact of embolisation for trauma.


Assuntos
Linfócitos B/imunologia , Embolização Terapêutica , Células T Matadoras Naturais/imunologia , Esplenectomia , Artéria Esplênica , Ferimentos não Penetrantes/imunologia , Adulto , Análise de Variância , Complemento C3/metabolismo , Complemento C4/metabolismo , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Properdina/metabolismo , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Ferimentos não Penetrantes/terapia
2.
Surgery ; 146(4): 585-90; discussion 590-1, 2009 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19789016

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Optimizing cerebral oxygenation is advocated to improve outcome in head-injured patients. The purpose of this study was to compare outcomes in brain-injured patients treated with 2 types of monitors. METHODS: Patients with traumatic brain injury and a Glasgow Coma Scale score<8 were identified on admission. A polarographic cerebral oxygen/pressure monitor (Licox) or fiberoptic intracranial pressure monitor (Camino) was inserted. An evidence-based algorithm for treatment was implemented. Elements from the prehospital and emergency department records and the first 10 days of intensive care unit (ICU) care were collected. Glasgow Outcome Scores (GOS) were determined every 3 months after discharge. RESULTS: Over a 3-year period, 145 patients were entered into the study; 81 patients in the Licox group and 64 patients in the Camino group. Mortality, hospital length of stay, and ICU length of stay were equivalent in the 2 groups. More patients in the Licox group achieved a moderate/recovered GOS at 3 months than in the Camino Group (79% vs 61%; P = .09). CONCLUSION: Three-month GOS revealed a clinically meaningful 18% benefit in patients undergoing cerebral oxygen monitoring and optimization. Six-month outcomes were also better. Unfortunately, these important differences did not reach significance. Continued study of the benefits of cerebral oxygen monitoring is warranted.


Assuntos
Lesões Encefálicas/fisiopatologia , Encéfalo/fisiopatologia , Oxigênio/análise , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Monitorização Fisiológica , Polarografia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA