Cultural analysis of communication behaviors among juveniles in a correctional facility.

This study addressed communication behaviors of female juvenile delinquents in a correctional facility. Qualitative methodology was used to study 78 participants ranging in age from 13.1 to 18.9 (years; months), over a five-month period. Data collection consisted of observations, participant observation, interviews, and a review of documents. Additionally, participants were tested on the Clinical Evaluation of Language Fundamentals-3. Listening and following rules, utterance types, topics of conversion, politeness, and conversational management emerged as themes. Findings indicated that as many as 22% of participants were potential candidates for language services. Implications for speech-language pathologists (SLPs) providing communication services will be provided.

Female juvenile delinquents' pragmatic awareness of conversational interactions.

Standardized testing has shown that juvenile delinquents have a high incidence of communication problems; however, discourse analyses have failed to confirm pragmatic deficits. This study's purpose was to explore, using qualitative procedures, the pragmatic awareness of female juvenile delinquents concerning conversational interactions. The 45 participants engaged in small-group conversations about communication during multiple class periods. On-line field notes served as the data and were used to determine emerging patterns of verbal and nonverbal communication behaviors. Identified themes included (a) active listening; (b) body position; (c) eye contact, facial expressions, and gestures; (d) utterance types; (e) topics of conversation; (f) politeness and honesty; and (g) conversational management. Results suggested that juvenile delinquents can state many conventions governing conversational interactions; however, some do not always display interactional behaviors consistent with their pragmatic awareness. Discrepancies about pragmatic awareness are discussed in terms of the underlying nature of communication challenges in delinquent populations.

Follow-up of children at risk for language problems.

Nineteen students (ages 10-14) who were previously identified as at risk for language problems were examined after a period of five to seven years. Information concerning cognitive, academic, and linguistic skills was collected using standardized and informal measures. Results were analyzed for the total group and also for two subgroups. At the time of follow-up, seven subjects (37%) who had not been served by a speech-language pathologist (SLP) were unidentified with language impairments (LI); two subjects (11%) were being seen by a SLP; one subject (5%) was identified as mentally handicapped, and nine subjects (47%) did not exhibit language problems. Subgroup comparisons between the seven unidentified language impaired subjects (LI) and the nine without language impairments (contrast = CG) revealed lower language scores, especially for receptive and composite language as measured by the CELF-R and TLC-E. Teachers rated these two groups (LI and CG) differently in the areas of following/giving directions, initiating/maintaining conversation, and taking turns. Parents also reported greater concerns for the LI group in the areas of listening, communication, and social skills. Issues concerning identification of at-risk groups and future studies using at-risk populations are discussed.

Language samples using three story elicitation tasks and maturation effects.

The spoken language skills of 20 elementary students with verified learning disabilities were explored using a story format and discourse analysis procedure. The purpose was to compare the performance of LD students on three types of story tasks (story generation from a picture, story generation from memory, and story generation based on a game) over a one-year period. Results indicated statistically significant main effects for approximately half (9/17) of the discourse variables by task and one main effect for time. Overall, stories from memory were longer and characterized by more as well as different types of errors than were stories from pictures or stories based on games. Implications for use of stories and type of story collection task in language sampling are discussed.

Language skills of delinquent and nondelinquent adolescent males.

A comparison of language skills between adolescent juvenile delinquent males and matched nondelinquent peers was made using an informal language sample analysis (a modified Clinical Discourse Analysis) and the TOAL-2 measure. Twenty-four institutionalized delinquents and 24 nondelinquents ranging in age from 14.4 to 17.9 years were subjects. Their respective mean full scale intelligence quotients were 99.75 and 101.25 and they had no known verified handicapping conditions. Two one-way ANOVAs showed that there were significant differences for language skills on the dependent measures between the two groups. Differences between the groups also were observed from descriptive statistics for academic performance. Implications for assessment and treatment of "at-risk" populations are addressed.

A comparison of the SSW and language test results.

The purpose of this paper is to determine the relationship between the SSW and a battery of auditory-language tests in a group of children suspected of auditory processing problems. Thirty-one children between the ages of 6.2 and 10.4 were referred by their classroom teachers. All children were administered a pure tone and an acoustic immittance battery, the SSW test, selected subtests of the Clinical Evaluation of Language Functions, the Goldman-Fristoe-Woodcock Auditory Skills Battery, an elicited language sample, and the Observational Profile of Classroom Communication. No significant correlations were found between the SSW right competing and left competing conditions and the auditory-language test battery. The findings suggest that these two test approaches measure different aspects of auditory processing abilities in children, and both are required to adequately describe auditory processing abilities at all levels.

An assessment technique for children with auditory-language processing problems.

The purpose of this study was to develop a new multilayer clinical assessment technique to evaluate auditory-language processing abilities in children. Following a 90-min in-service workshop on auditory-language processing problems, 46 nonhandicapped first-, second-, and third-grade students were referred by their classroom teachers for an evaluation of auditory-language processing abilities. Twelve "normally" achieving first-, second-, and third-grade students were randomly selected as controls. Standardized and nonstandardized measures included a pure tone and impedance test, selected subtests of the Clinical Evaluation of Language Functions (Linguistic Concepts, Relationships and Ambiguities, Oral Directions, Spoken Paragraphs, Word Associations, and Model Sentences), the Goldman-Fristoe-Woodcock (GFW) Memory for Sequence Test, Sound Mimicry Test, Sound-Symbol Association Test, and the GFW Test of Auditory Discrimination. Nonstandardized measures included an Observational Profile of Classroom Communication and an informal language sample. Results indicated 87% of 46 (n = 40) children were identified as having auditory-language processing problems. In-service training was an effective means to heighten teachers' awareness for referring subjects. Additionally, the Observational Profile of Classroom Communication was an effective procedure for teachers to systematically observe and document communication behaviors in the context of the classroom.

Specific syndromes and associated communication disorders: a review.

The purpose of this review is to provide speech-language pathologists and special educators with an awareness of genetics and specific syndromes that involve a speech, language, or hearing component. Both genetic and environmental etiologies are discussed. A description is provided for some of the physical anomalies associated with selected syndromes that also include speech and language deficits. These are presented to provide a rationale for the speech-language pathologist as well as special educators to become more active team members in the identification of syndromes, promote early remedial intervention, and increase interaction with other disciplines in dealing with the multihandicapped child.