The knee kinematic patterns and associated factors in healthy Thai adults.

BACKGROUND: Reference values for normal knee kinematics were limited in Asian population and were influenced by race and other factors. This study was aimed to establish the reference values and identify the factors associated with knee kinematics in healthy Thai adults, aged 18-40 years. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted between 2016 and 2020. Healthy Thai adults aged 18-40 years old with body mass index (BMI) between 18.5 and 24.9 kg/m2 were included. All eligible participants were attached with reflective markers. Their walking was captured by 8-digital cameras, and assessed by motion analysis software. The primary outcomes were average knee kinematic data (degrees) in three dimensional planes as valgus-varus, flexion-extension, and internal-external rotation. Paired t-test and multiple linear regression were applied to compare the outcomes and to determine their associated factors. RESULTS: Ninety-eight participants (60 females and 38 males) were included with mean age 28.5 ± 5.4 years, and BMI 21.1 ± 2.0 kg/m2. Knee kinematics showed slight adduction during the swing phase, flexion during the stance phase, and obvious external rotation throughout the gait cycle, with a peak of 30-31 degrees during mid-swing. Right knee was significantly more adducted, flexed and externally rotated than the left side, particularly at mid-stance (P = 0.047, 0.017, and < 0.001, respectively). Females had more knee abduction, flexion and external rotation than males. Age, sex, and BMI were significantly correlated with knee abduction at terminal stance (correlation coefficient - 0.12, 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.23, -0.01; -1.37, 95%CI -2.54, -0.20; and - 0.32, 95%CI -0.61, -0.39, respectively), and rotation at mid-swing (correlation coefficient - 0.36, 95%CI -0.69, -0.02; -7.37, 95%CI -10.82, -3.92; and 0.89, 95%CI 0.01, 1.78, respectively). CONCLUSION: Knee kinematics demonstrates external tibial rotation throughout the gait cycle, significant side differences, and are associated with age, sex, and BMI. Reference values from this study will be useful for functional gait assessment in healthy Thais. However, further comprehensive knee kinetic study including spatio-temporal parameter is recommended.

The ankle kinematic reference of normal gait pattern in Thai adults.

Objective: This study was aimed to establish the reference values of ankle kinematics and factors associated with ankle kinematics of healthy Thai adults. Methods: A prospective cohort was conducted among healthy volunteers aged between 18 and 40 years and evaluated gait analysis between 2016 and 2020. After applying the modified Halen Hayes marker set, participants were assigned to walk 8-10 rounds with their preferred speed. Demographic data i.e., age, gender and body mass index (BMI) and ankle kinematics (varus-valgus, dorsiflexion-plantar flexion, foot progression, and ankle rotation) using motion analysis software were recorded and analyzed. Results: 98 volunteers (60 females and 38 males) aged 28.6 ± 5.4 years with body mass index 21.2 ± 2.0 kg/m2 were included. The average ranges of ankle kinematics entire gait cycle were varus-valgus -1.62 to 3.17 degrees, dorsiflexion-plantar flexion 0.67 to 14.52 degrees, foot progression -21.73 to -8.47 degrees, and ankle rotation 5.22 to 9.74 degrees. The ankle kinematic data in this study population was significantly different from the normal values supplied by OrthoTrak software of the motion analysis program, especially more ankle internal rotation at mid-stance (5.22 vs. -12.10 degrees) and terminal stance (5.48 vs. -10.74 degrees) with P < 0.001. Foot progression significantly exhibited more external rotation for 1.5 degrees on the right compared to the left side, and for 5 degrees more in males than females. One increment in age was significantly correlated with ankle internal rotation at mid-swing (coefficient 0.21 degrees, P = 0.039). BMI had no statistical association with ankle kinematics. Statistical parametric mapping for full-time series of angle assessments showed significantly different foot progression at initial contact and terminal stance between sides, and our ankle kinematics significantly differed from the reference values of the motion analysis program in all planes (P < 0.05). Conclusion: The reference of ankle kinematics of Thai adults was established and differences between sides and the normal values of the motion analysis program were identified. Advanced age was associated with ankle internal rotation, and male gender was related to external foot progression. Further studies are needed to define all-age group reference values.