RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Reference intervals for simple body weight-independent measurements of right heart size and function are limited. OBJECTIVES: Generate reference intervals for measurements of right heart size indexed to the long-axis aortic valve diameter (AoD) or corresponding left heart structure (right heart ratios) and describe the reproducibility of these indices. ANIMALS: Ninety healthy adult dogs of variable body weight. METHODS: Prospective study. All dogs underwent an echocardiogram performed by the same operator. Numerous linear 2-dimensional measurements of right heart size and function from different imaging planes were performed. Eight dogs underwent repeated echocardiograms by the same operator on 3 different days, and 3 different operators performed repeated echocardiograms on the same day. Reference intervals were generated using the Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute method. Reproducibility was quantitated using coefficients of variation (CVs) and reproducibility coefficients. RESULTS: Reference intervals for right heart ratios were generated and allow simple assessments of right heart size and function that do not require a scaling exponent or body weight table. Right heart ratios did not show clinically relevant associations with body weight. All CVs were <22.6%. In general, CVs for right heart measurements indexed to AoD were lower compared with right heart measurements indexed to the corresponding left heart structure. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: Reference intervals for simple body weight-independent right heart ratios are available to help detect abnormalities of right heart size and function. Reproducibility coefficients might be useful to help identify meaningful changes in right heart size during serial evaluations.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Radiographic assessment of the intrathoracic caudal vena cava (CVC) is commonly used to evaluate hemodynamic status in veterinary patients without and with pulmonary, pericardial, or right-sided cardiac diseases. Many of these patients are now commonly evaluated with computed tomography (CT) in both emergency and referral settings. Traditional radiographic ratios in dogs, particularly the CVC height/aorta height (CVC/Ao) ratio, are often extrapolated to CT in order to determine if the CVC is normal in size. OBJECTIVES: The first goal of this retrospective study was to create an objective measurement method to evaluate the size of the CVC via CT. The second goal was to report normal CVC ratio values in both sagittal and transverse CT images. METHODS: The traditional lateral radiographic CVC ratios were extrapolated to similar ratios obtained from sagittal CT images in stable, sedated adult canine patients without known cardiac or pulmonary disease. Additionally, new methods of canine CVC ratios using transverse CT images were defined using vessel height and area. Mean, standard deviation, and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of the CVC ratios in transverse and sagittal CT images were calculated to determine normal reference ranges. RESULTS: Ratio agreement from observers of different skill levels was moderate to excellent. Sagittal CT CVC/Ao mean was 1.07 ± 0.17 with a CI of 0.71.42. The mean and CI of transverse CT CVC/Ao height and area were 1.14 ± 0.27 and 0.781.44 and 1.36 ± 0.59 and 0.641.94, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Application of normal sagittal and transverse CT ratio values in canine patients with and without hypotension, pulmonary, pericardial, or right-sided cardiac diseases is necessary to determine the clinical usefulness of these ratios.