The efficacy and tolerability of intravenous montelukast in acute asthma exacerbations in Japanese patients.

OBJECTIVES: In Japan, the Asthma Prevention and Management Guidelines recommend nebulized ß-agonists, IV (intravenous) drip corticosteroids, as well as IV drip aminophylline for acute asthma treatment. However, current treatment for acute asthma provides inadequate benefit for some patients. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of IV montelukast added to standard therapy in Japanese patients with acute asthma exacerbations. METHODS: This multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study compared IV montelukast 7 mg, 14 mg, and placebo in Japanese patients with acute asthma exacerbations (N = 242). Fifteen- to sixty-five-year-old patients with acute asthma were treated with standard care during a screening period that lasted ≤60 minutes. Patients with FEV(1) (forced expiratory volume in 1 second) ≤70 predicted were randomly allocated to one of three treatment groups. The primary end point was the time-weighted average change in FEV(1) from baseline over 60 minutes [ΔFEV(1) (0-60 minutes)] after study drug administration. Secondary end points included the time-weighted average change in FEV(1) over 20, 40, and 120 minutes [ΔFEV(1) (0-T min)]. RESULTS: IV montelukast 7 mg was significantly more effective than placebo for the time-weighted average ΔFEV(1) (0-60 minutes) [least squares (LS) mean 0.09 L vs. 0.01 L; p < .05]. IV montelukast 14 mg was also more effective than placebo (LS mean 0.17 L; p < .001). Similar improvements in time-weighted average [ΔFEV(1) (0-T min)] were seen at all time points (all p < .05). Both doses of IV montelukast demonstrated a significant increase in average ΔFEV(1) compared with placebo within 10 minutes of administration (p < .001 to p < .01). The tolerability of IV montelukast was similar to that of placebo. CONCLUSION: IV montelukast was significantly more effective than placebo in the improvement of ΔFEV(1) in Japanese patients, suggesting its role as an adjunctive therapy to existing guideline recommendations.

Comparison of salmeterol/fluticasone propionate (FP) combination with FP+sustained release theophylline in moderate asthma patients.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy and safety of the salmeterol/fluticasone propionate combination product with concurrent sustained release theophylline plus fluticasone propionate in adult Japanese patients with persistent asthma. DESIGN: Multicentre, randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group study. PATIENTS AND INTERVENTIONS: Three hundred and eighty-three asthmatic patients receiving sustained release theophylline 200-400mg/day entered the study and were randomised to receive either salmeterol/fluticasone propionate combination (SFC) 50microg/250microg+1 placebo tablet, fluticasone propionate 250microg+1 sustained release theophylline 200mg (SR-T+FP), twice daily for 8 weeks. RESULTS: The adjusted mean change morning peak expiratory flow (PEF) over 8 weeks was 29.8L/min in the SFC group and 16.3L/min in the SR-T+FP group, with a treatment difference of 13.4L/min (p=0.0004). SFC improved evening PEF, FEV1, V50 and V25 at the completion of treatment to a greater extent than SR-T+FP (all p<0.05). A higher percentage of patients on SFC were symptom free (p=0.0286) and rescue free (ns) than those on SR-T+FP. There was not a statistically significant difference between treatments in symptom scores. Both treatments were well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: The finding that SFC was associated with greater improvements in lung function than SR-T+FP, a commonly employed treatment for asthmatic patients in Japan, suggests that SFC should be the preferred therapeutic option in these patients.

[A multicenter, open-label, randomized comparison of suppressive effects on asthmatic inflammation of lower airways and improved effects on health-related QOL between HFA-BDP and fluticasone propionate].

PURPOSE: It is important to evaluate the effects of hydrofluoroalkane-beclomethasone dipropionate (HFA-BDP), which shows predominant deposition in the lower airways, on asthmatic inflammation in the lower airways and the Quality of Life (QOL) of asthma patients, as compared with those of fluticasone propionate (FP) Diskus. METHODS: Seventy-seven adult patients with mild persistent or more severe asthma who were being treated with FP for >/=3 months were randomly assigned to the HFA-BDP group and continued FP group. The differential count of eosinophils in the peripheral blood, the serum cortisol levels, and pulmonary function parameters were measured before the study and at 3 months after the start of the study treatment. The improvements in the Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) scores were also compared. Sputum samples collected by the induced expectoration method (inhalation of 10% saline for 15 min) were divided into the early-phase sputum samples obtained within 15 minutes of the inhalation and the late-phase sputum samples obtained later than 15 minutes after the inhalation, and the eosinophil count and eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) levels were measured. RESULTS: In the HFA-BDP group (N=40), the differential count of eosinophils in the peripheral blood was significantly decreased as compared with that in the FP group (p=0.009), and the scores in all the domains of the AQLQ and the percentage improvement of the total score were significantly better as compared with those in FP group (p=0.033). The eosinophil count in the late-phase sputum samples (p=0.022) as well as the ECP level in the sputum samples showed more pronounced decreases in the HFA-BDP group as compared with those in the FP group. On the other hand, no significant changes were detected in the pulmonary function values. CONCLUSION: Use of the HFA-BDP preparation can more effectively suppress residual inflammation in the lower airways and significantly improve the QOL as compared with use of the FP preparation of asthma patients. Examination of induced sputum samples allows detection of changes in the peripheral airways that cannot be detected by pulmonary function testing.

Silico-asbestosis that responded to steroid therapy.

A 73-year-old man with silico-asbestosis responded to steroid therapy. Chest CT scans showed diffuse micronodular opacities and ground glass opacities bilaterally throughout the entire lung fields, as well as progressive massive fibrosis in the bilateral upper lung fields. Diagnostic thoracoscopic biopsy revealed mixed dust pneumoconiosis with silicotic nodules, as well as fibrosis similar to that of Usual Interstitial Pneumonia (UIP) with many fibroblastic foci and alveolitis. Many asbestos bodies were also detected by iron staining.

Effects of nebulized sodium cromoglycate on adult patients with severe refractory asthma.

Many patients with severe refractory asthma, which is insufficiently controlled by additional high-dose of inhaled corticosteroids, require oral corticosteroids and/or immunosuppressant. Clinicians should seek for suitable medications, for its' chronic use may induce high risk of side effects. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of nebulized sodium cromoglycate (3-4 times/day) in adult severe asthmatic patients with poorly controlled asthmatic symptoms, despite treatments with high-dose inhaled corticosteroids. Adult patients with severe asthma (n=251) were enrolled in a randomized clinical trial at 30 medical centers in Japan. Isotonic saline was used as placebo. The study was conducted for 10 weeks; with initial 2 weeks of observation followed by 8 weeks of treatments. Efficacy was primarily evaluated based on improvements in morning peak expiratory flow after treatment. All patients who applied inhalation of nebulized sodium cromoglycate (SCG group) or saline (Controls) were treated with high-dose of inhaled corticosteroids (median of beclomethasone dipropionate equivalent dose: 1600 microg/days) and second-line control therapy including oral corticosteroids. There was no significant difference in morning peak expiratory flow between SCG group and controls. However, when patients were stratified into atopic and non-atopic groups, morning peak expiratory flow had significantly improved in the atopic SCG group compared to atopic Controls. Additional inhalation of nebulized sodium cromoglycate with inhaled corticosteroids is effective even in patients with severe atopic asthma. This finding shows that nebulized sodium cromoglycate is expected to be new second-line therapeutic option in severe asthma.

Polymorphisms in the prostaglandin E2 receptor subtype 2 gene confer susceptibility to aspirin-intolerant asthma: a candidate gene approach.

Aspirin-intolerant asthma (AIA) is a subtype of bronchial asthma characterized by development of bronchoconstriction evoked by non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). NSAIDs inhibit the cyclooxygenase pathway, leading to enhancement of the lipoxygenase pathway. We evaluated allelic association of 370 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of 63 candidate genes, mostly from the arachidonic acid metabolic cascade, with AIA. After two rounds of screening with 198 AIA patients, multiple SNPs in the prostaglandin E(2) receptor subtype 2 (EP2) gene were associated with AIA (P<0.05). Among the 77 SNPs identified in the EP2 gene, we selected 17 SNPs on the basis of linkage disequilibrium and allelic frequencies (minor allele frequency >0.1) for further association study. SNPs in the promoter region of the EP2 gene, uS5, uS5b, and uS7, were significantly associated with AIA (permutation P=0.039-0.001). Analysis of haplotypes constructed according to the LD pattern showed a significant association with AIA (permutation P=0.001). The most significantly associated SNP, uS5, located in the regulatory region of the EP2 gene, was in a STATs-binding consensus sequence [AIA 31.1% versus control 22.1% (permutation P=0.0016) or versus aspirin-tolerant asthma 22.2% (permutation P=0.0017)]. Although STAT1 binding was not observed in gel mobility shift assay with HeLa nuclear extract, an unidentified protein was specifically bound to the allelic sequence. In in vitro reporter assay in HCT116 cells, the site containing the uS5 allele showed reduced transcription activity. Taken together, these results suggest that uS5 allele serves as a target of a transcription repressor protein. A functional SNP of the EP2 gene associated with risk of AIA should decrease the transcription level, resulting in reduction of the PGE(2) braking mechanism of inflammation and involvement in the molecular mechanism underlying AIA.

Influence of inhaled corticosteroids on community-acquired pneumonia in patients with bronchial asthma.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the influence of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) on community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) in patients with asthma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All asthmatic patients who required hospitalization for CAP from the beginning of 1989 through December 2001 were enrolled in this retrospective study. Patients who used oral corticosteroids daily were excluded. Patients were divided into two groups based on whether or not they used ICS, and we analyzed clinical characteristics of the pneumonia. Sixty-two patients (28 males, 34 females; mean age, 54.5 years) were enrolled in this study. Thirty-seven of 62 patients used ICS, with the mean dosage being 777.9 microg/day. RESULTS: We found no significant differences between the two groups with regard to mean age, serum albumin level, duration of asthma, pulmonary function and frequency of intravenous infusion of corticosteroids in the outpatient department. There were no significant differences in body temperature, white blood cell count, and CRP value upon admission between the two groups. Differences were not significant in the period of resolution of the pneumonia or in the frequency of pathogens identified between the two groups. CONCLUSION: ICS therapy appears to have no influence on CAP in patients with asthma. We recommend that ICS should be continued to control asthma with adequate antibiotic therapy when asthmatic patients have CAP.

[A case of eosinophilic gastroenteritis: observation of serum IL-5 and sIL-2R levels before and after remission].

56 years-old man was admitted to our hospital because of severe diarrhea and hypereosinophilia. There was tenderness in the middle part of his abdomen. Laboratory examination revealed elevation of serum IL-5 and serum IL-2R value. No pathogens were detected from his stool specimen. An abdominal CT showed neither ascites nor thickening of intestinal wall. Pathological finding showed marked eosinophil infiltration in gastric and colonic mucosa. Eosinophilic gastroenteritis was diagnosed. His symptom was gradually improved spontaneously at the point of diagnosis. But administration of suplatast tosilate was stared because patients with this disease often relapse. Abdominal symptom was completely disappeared and value of serum IL-5 and sIL-2R was decreased at the end of September. This finding may imply pathogenesis of this disease.

Concerted expression of eotaxin-1, eotaxin-2, and eotaxin-3 in human bronchial epithelial cells.

Eotaxin-1/CCL11, eotaxin-2/CCL24, and eotaxin-3/CCL26 bind specifically and exclusively to CC chemokine receptor (CCR) 3, which is a potential therapeutic target in treating the peribronchial eosinophilia associated with allergic airway diseases. Bronchial epithelial cells represent an important source of chemokines, and thus we investigated in vitro and in vivo expression of eotaxin-2 and eotaxin-3 in bronchial epithelial cells in comparison with that of eotaxin-1. Immunohistochemistry showed increased expression of both eotaxin-2 and eotaxin-3 in addition to eotaxin-1 in asthmatics. Considerable amounts of eotaxins were secreted by bronchial epithelial lineage. As with eotaxin-1 production, generation of eotaxin-2 and eotaxin-3 by bronchial epithelial cells was up-regulated by IL-4 and IL-13, and attenuated by IFN-gamma and glucocorticoids. In addition to eotaxin-1 expression, but also eotaxin-2 and eotaxin-3 expression in the bronchial epithelium should be taken into consideration when developing the therapeutic strategies to treat eosinophilic airway diseases.

Effects of suplatast tosilate on allergic eosinophilic airway inflammation in patients with mild asthma.

BACKGROUND: Bronchial asthma is a chronic inflammatory disease characterized mainly by infiltration of the airway mucosa by various inflammatory cells, notably eosinophils. T(H)2-type cytokines are suggested to be deeply involved in the pathogenesis of asthma. OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine the suppressive effects of suplatast tosilate, an inhibitor of T(H)2-type cytokines, on eosinophilic inflammation of the bronchial mucosa in patients with mild asthma. METHODS: Airway hyperresponsiveness tests, pulmonary function tests, eosinophil measurements in induced sputum, and bronchial mucosa biopsies were performed before and after treatment with suplatast tosilate for 6 weeks in 15 patients with mild asthma and in 13 control patients with mild asthma not receiving suplatast tosilate. This study was performed as a case-controlled open study. RESULTS: In the treatment group a significant improvement in the provocation concentration of histamine was observed (P <.05). Improvements in peak expiratory flow (P <.01) and in symptom score (P <.05) were also noted in the suplatast tosilate-treated group. Moreover, the average number of infiltrating eosinophils and EG2(+) cells significantly decreased (both P <.05), as did the ratios of eosinophils and EG2(+) cells in sputum (both P <.01). The average number of CD4(+) and CD25(+) T lymphocytes also decreased (both P <.05). CONCLUSION: Suplatast tosilate appears to inhibit allergic airway inflammation mediated by T(H)2-type cytokine and to improve clinical symptoms in patients with mild asthma.

[Clinical properties of community-acquired pneumonia in patients with asthma].

PURPOSE: Many reports were found on the clinical properties of community-acquired pneumonia. The clinical properties of community-acquired pneumonia in patients with asthma have not been elucidated, and we therefore investigated such properties. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Asthmatic patients who required hospitalization for community-acquired pneumonia from the beginning of 1989 through the end of 2001 were enrolled in this study. We performed the study in a retrospective manner. Patients were divided into two groups based on severity of their asthma (mild to moderate asthma vs severe asthma), and we studied the clinical properties of the pneumonia. RESULT: No significant difference was seen in body temperature, white blood cell counts, or CRP value on admission between the two groups. No significant difference was seen in the resolving period of the pneumonia. The frequency of common pathogens (Streptococcus pneumoniae + Haemophilus influenzae) was lower in patients with severe asthma. Asthmatic patients not taking daily oral corticosteroids were divided into two groups based on whether or not they were using a inhaled corticosteroid, and we examined the frequency of pathogendetection. The percentage of common pathogens was almost the same in the two groups. CONCLUSION: The frequency of common pathogens was lower in patients with severe asthma than in those with mild to moderate asthma. This fact is worth considering when empiric therapy for pneumonia is performed in patients with asthma. Inhaled corticosteroid therapy seems to have no influence on the pathogens of pneumonia in patients with asthma.

[Management of patients with bronchial asthma received general anesthesia and surgical intervention].

Stimulation to bronchial mucosa is one of the major risk factor of asthma attack. When patients receive surgical intervention and general anesthesia, they are always exposed to stimulation to bronchial mucosa. Prevention method of bronchial asthma attack during surgical intervention is not established yet. We investigated that clinical course of patients with bronchial asthma who received general anesthesia and surgical intervention. Seventy-six patients with bronchial asthma were received general anesthesia and surgical intervention from 1993 to 1998. Twenty-four patients were mild asthmatic patients, 39 were moderate asthmatic patients and 13 were severe asthmatic patients. Preoperative treatment for preventing asthma attack was as follows; Eight patients were given intravenous infusion of aminophylline before operation. Fifty-two patients were given intravenous infusion of aminophylline and hydrocortisone before operation. Three patients were given intravenous infusion of hydrocortisone for consecutive 3 days before operation. Thirteen patients were given no treatment for preventing asthma attack. One patient was suffered from asthma attack during operation. She was given no preventing treatment for asthma attack before operation. Three patients were suffered from asthma attack after operation. No wound dehiscence was observed in all patients. To prevent asthma attack during operation, intravenous infusion of steroid before operation is recommended, when patients with asthma receive general anesthesia and surgical intervention.

Reduction of eosinophilic inflammation in the airways of patients with asthma using montelukast.

OBJECTIVE: Leukotrienes (LTs) are involved in airway eosinophilic inflammation in patients with asthma. We examined the effects of a cysteinyl LT 1-receptor antagonist, montelukast, on sputum eosinophil levels, and the correlation between sputum eosinophils and bronchodilatation in patients with asthma. DESIGN: Double-blind, randomized, crossover study. SETTING: University hospital and private hospital. PATIENTS: Twenty-nine patients with mild-to-moderate asthma. INTERVENTIONS: Montelukast, 10 mg, and placebo tablet, once daily, each for 4 weeks. MEASUREMENTS: Sputum eosinophils analyzed using hypertonic saline solution-induced sputum and airway hyperresponsiveness to histamine were evaluated before and after treatment. In addition, morning and evening peak expiratory flow (PEF), asthma symptoms, and peripheral blood eosinophil levels were assessed. RESULTS: The percentage of eosinophils in sputum decreased from 24.6 +/- 12.3% at baseline to 15.1 +/- 11.8% after montelukast treatment, for a change of - 9.5 +/- 12.7% (n = 20). During placebo administration, the percentage of eosinophils fell from 21.3 +/- 12.1% to 21.0 +/- 11.5%, resulting in a decrease of - 0.3 +/- 10.8% (n = 20). There was a statistically significant difference in the change in sputum eosinophil levels between these two periods (p < 0.005). The number of peripheral blood eosinophils also significantly decreased after montelukast treatment (314.1 +/- 237.6/mL) compared with placebo (413.1 +/- 232.1/mL; p < 0.005, n = 21). Although morning and evening PEF values were significantly improved from baseline after montelukast treatment (p < 0.01, n = 20), asthma symptoms and airway responsiveness to histamine were not significantly altered. Furthermore, there was no significant correlation between the decrease in sputum eosinophils and the increase in PEF. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that montelukast has anti-inflammatory effects on the airway in patients with asthma, and that its bronchodilatory effect is not solely dependent on a decrease in airway eosinophilia.