The discriminant ability of the eating assessment tool-10 questionnaire to detect residue and aspiration in patients with mixed etiology of dysphagia.

PURPOSE: To investigate the discriminant ability of the eating assessment tool-10 (EAT-10) to detect postswallow residue and aspiration for different consistencies. METHODS: Seventy-two consecutive patients with mixed etiology of dysphagia (42 males and 30 females, mean ± sd age of 60.42 ± 15.82) were included. After completing the EAT-10, Fiberoptic Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing (FEES) was performed to assess the efficiency and safety of swallowing for the following consistencies: thin liquid, nectar thick, yogurt, and solid. While swallowing efficiency was evaluated using the Yale Pharyngeal Residue Severity Rating Scale (YPRSRS), the Penetration-Aspiration Scale (PAS) was used to evaluate swallowing safety. RESULTS: The EAT-10 questionnaire significantly identified the patients with residue from those without residue for the following consistencies and anatomic locations: thin liquid residue in the pyriform sinus (cutoff score ≥ 10, p = 0.009), nectar thick residue in the vallecula (cutoff score ≥ 15, p = 0.001), yogurt residue in the vallecula (cutoff score ≥ 15, p = 0.009), yogurt residue in the pyriform sinus (cutoff score ≥ 9, p = 0.015), and solid residue in the vallecula (cutoff score ≥ 13, p = 0.016). However, the same discriminant ability of EAT-10 was not found for detecting aspiration in any consistency. CONCLUSIONS: The EAT-10 questionnaire can be used as an assessment tool to judge swallowing efficiency in patients with mixed etiology of dysphagia, but the same is not evident for swallowing safety.

Long-Term Balance Outcomes in Vestibular Ablative Surgeries.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the long-term balance outcomes of vestibular nerve section (VNS) and labyrinthectomy (L) operations. The indirect outcomes will be the correlation of objective and subjective test results and an analysis of anterior-posterior versus medial-lateral computerized posturography (CP) scores. METHODS: This retrospective study evaluated objective CP and subjective Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI) results of patients who underwent VNS and L surgeries for Ménière's disease. RESULTS: A total of 55 (31 VNS and 24 L) patients were included in the study. The two operation groups were similar in terms of age, and mean time between surgery and the tests (p=0.465 and p=0.616) respectively. The vestibular and global scores at anterior-posterior CP showed statistically significant differences between the groups (p=0.000 and p=0.007) respectively in favor of the VNS group. In addition, the comparison of the vestibular CP scores of anterior-posterior and medial-lateral evaluations of the entire study population was lower in the medial-lateral evaluation (p=0.000). The mean DHI scores did not show statistically significant differences (p=0.359) between operation groups, nor did the correlation analysis between CP and DHI scores reveal statistical significance (p values >0.05). CONCLUSION: In the long term, objective balance outcomes are better for VNS patients than for L patients. Additionally, medial-lateral balance outcomes are more affected than anterior-posterior balance outcomes from unilateral ablative surgeries. Subjective balance perception is not different between the two surgery groups, and DHI scores do not show a correlation with CP scores.

The Relationship of Vestibulo-Ocular Reflex With Self-Reported Dizziness Handicap in Patients With Vestibular Deafferentation.

The relationship between objective vestibular tests and subjective vestibular tests is a controversial topic. In this study, to contribute to this issue, the vestibulo-ocular reflex features and their relationship with balance perception at long-term follow-up in vestibular neurectomy (VN) and total labyrentectomy patients were evaluated. Prospectively, 19 VN and 18 labyrinthectomy patients were enrolled in this study. Patients underwent video head impulse test (VHIT) as objective vestibular test and dizziness handicap inventory (DHI) as subjective vestibular test when they attended to their control visit follow-up between March and September 2017. Lateral canal corrective saccades were classified as organized pattern and deorganized (scattered) pattern. In our results, the saccade pattern analysis (between organized and deorganized saccades) regarding the DHI scores gave P value as .039 for covert saccade pattern and .050 for overt saccade pattern. Therefore, we conclude that the presence of saccades, their patterns, and amplitudes provide extra information at assessing the results of the VHIT test, and the organized pattern of saccades is related to a stable vestibular system and better balance perception.