Endoscopic enucleation for prostate larger than 60 mL: comparison between holmium laser enucleation and plasmakinetic enucleation.

PURPOSE: To compare perioperative and functional outcomes of two different energy sources, holmium laser and bipolar current for endoscopic enucleation of prostate larger than 60 mL. METHODS: A prospective, monocentric, comparative, non-randomized study was conducted including all patients treated for prostate larger than 60 mL, measured by transrectal ultrasound. Patients were assigned to each group based on the surgeons' practice. Perioperative data were collected (preoperative characteristics, operating, catheterization and hospitalization times, hemoglobin loss, complications) and functional outcomes (IPSS, IPSS Quality of Life (QoL), PSA) at 3 months and 1 year. RESULTS: 100 patients were included in each group from October 2015 to March 2018. No differences between HoLEP and plasma groups were observed at baseline, except for mean IPSS score, IPSS QoL score and preoperative PVR that were significantly higher in the HoLEP group. Operating time (142.1 vs 122.4 min; p = 0.01), catheterization time (59.6 vs 44.4 h; p = 0.01) and hospitalization time (2.5 vs 1.8 days; p = 0.02) were significantly shorter in the plasma group. Complication and transfusion rate were no significantly different between HoLEP and plasma. No significant differences were observed concerning functional outcomes at 3 months and 1 year. The urinary incontinence rate was higher 21.1% vs 6.4% (p < 0.01) at 3 months in HoLEP group, but no difference was observed at 1 year. CONCLUSION: Holmium and plasma are both safe and effective for endoscopic treatment for prostate larger than 60 mL. Operating, catheterization and hospitalization times were significantly shorter in the plasma group. The complication rate and functional outcomes were not significantly different.

[French resident's performance on laparoscopic surgery box trainer: 7-year results of pelvitrainer contests]. / Performance des internes français sur simulateur de chirurgie laparoscopique : les résultats de 7 ans d'olympiades du pelvitrainer.

OBJECTIVES: The study objectives were to analyze the resident's laparoscopic surgery performance in order to build a self-assessment data set, to identify discriminatory exercises and to investigate the suturing time changes. METHODS: From 2007 to 2014, the French Association of Urologist in Training (AFUF) organized 7 pelvitrainer contests. Participant scores on 11 laparoscopic surgery exercises were evaluated. RESULTS: Sixty-six residents participated to these contests and performed 11 exercises each. Twenty-two (33.3 %) participants were beginners, 26 (39.4 %) intermediates et 18 (27.3 %) experienced. The participant scores were gathered into a data set including the average time per exercise. We found a time scoring improvement related to the resident experience for all exercises. A significant decline in time was noted for exercise 8 and 9 between beginners and intermediates (139s [±71]), (173.9s [±118.3]) and between beginners and experienced (80.6s [±26.7]), (94,1s [±42.7]) with a P<0.05. The correlation coefficient for the exercise 11 duration (vesico-uretral anastomosis) was 0.04 over a 7-year period (P=0.44). CONCLUSION: The study provided a data set on 11 laparoscopic surgery tasks which can be consulted by all residents as a reference in a self-assessment process. Two exercises (8 and 9) discriminated beginners from intermediates and experienced groups and could be used as a benchmark ahead of an operating room procedure. The vesico-uretral anastomosis duration (exercise 11) did not improve significantly between 2006 and 2014. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.

[Definition of botulinum toxin failure in neurogenic detrusor overactivity: Preliminary results of the DETOX survey]. / Définition et prise en charge de l'échec d'une première injection de toxine botulique Botox ® 200 U pour hyperactivité détrusorienne neurogène: résultats de l'enquête DETOX.

OBJECTIVE: There is currently no guideline regarding the management of neurogenic detrusor overactivity (NDO) refractory to intra-detrusor botulinum toxin injections. The primary objective of the present study was to find a consensus definition of failure of botulinum toxin intra-detrusor injections for NDO. The secondary objective was to report current trends in the managment of NDO refractory to botulinum toxin. METHODS: A survey was created, based on data drawn from current literature, and sent via e-mail to all the experts form the Group for research in neurourology in french language (GENULF) and from the comittee of neurourology of the French urological association (AFU). The experts who did not answer to the first e-mail were contacted again twice. Main results from the survey are presented and expressed as numbers and proportions. RESULTS: Out of the 42 experts contacted, 21 responded to the survey. Nineteen participants considered that the definition of failure should be a combination of clinical and urodynamics criteria. Among the urodynamics criteria, the persistence of a maximum detrusor pressure>40 cm H2O was the most supported by the experts (18/21, 85%). According to the vast majority of participants (19/21, 90.5%), the impact of injections on urinary incontinence should be included in the definition of failure. Regarding the management, most experts considered that the first line treatment in case of failure of a first intra-detrusor injection of Botox(®) 200 U should be a repeat injection of Botox(®) at a higher dosage (300 U) (15/20, 75%), regardless of the presence or not of urodynamics risk factors of upper tract damage (16/20, 80%). CONCLUSION: This work has provided a first overview of the definition of failure of intra-detrusor injections of botulinum toxin in the management of NDO. For 90.5% of the experts involved, the definition of failure should be clinical and urodynamic and most participants (75%) considered that, in case of failure of a first injection of Botox(®) 200 U, repeat injection of Botox(®) 300 U should be the first line treatment.

[Predictable access to the fellowship of urology in France till 2016: an update of the AFUF]. / Accessibilité prévisible au post-internat d'urologie en France jusqu'en 2016: une mise à jour de l'AFUF.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the predictable accessibility to the fellowship of urology for residents expecting to accomplish their residentship from November 2013 to November 2016. MATERIAL: Between September and November 2013, the representants of the residents ongoing for the residentship of urology in each region of France were reached to participate to the study. A questionnaire was given in aim at reporting all the local residents expecting to accomplish their residentship between November 2013 and 2016, and the number and the expected availability of fellow and specialist assistant posts in the region during the same period. RESULTS: In November 2013, our study listed 334 junior urologists (197 residents, 81 fellows, 56 assistants). Fifty-five residents were ending their internship by November 2013, whereas 67, 50, 77 residents were expecting to accomplish their residentship from November 2014 to 2016 respectively. The predictable accessibility to the fellowship of urology was 96.4%, 82.1%, 90.0%, 74.0% respectively for the residents accomplishing their residentship from November 2013 to November 2016. The predictable deficit of fellow and assistant posts were -2, -12, -5, -20 posts from November 2013 to November 2016 respectively. CONCLUSION: The predictable number of fellow and assistant post in Urology remains insufficiently available for the 2013-2016 period. By reason of the unstable number of residents accomplishing their residentship from 2014 to 2016, the fellowship accessibility was measured at 82.1%, 90.0%, 74.0% from 2014 to 2016 respectively.

[Current state of compensation of on-duty and on-call urologists in France: a study from AFUF]. / État des lieux des rémunérations des gardes et astreintes d'urologie en France: une étude de l'AFUF.

INTRODUCTION: The French Association of Urologists-in-training (AFUF) aimed to assess the current state of remunerations of on-call and on-duty residents, assistants and lecturers in urology in France. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Data were collected from February to May 2013 through a questionnaire sent to all members of the AFUF (327 members). Remunerations were given in gross values. RESULTS: Forty-three residents took part in the study, 16 assistants and 16 lecturers, representing 62 % of the whole centers (54 hospitals out of the 92 centers practicing urology in France). Most of responders were on security or operational on-call. Twenty hospitals were practicing multi-organ removal. Median remunerations of residents were about 59.51€ per on-call when moving at hospital for work and about 119.02€ per onsite duty. Assistants and lecturers were paid a flat fee rate for 37.5 % of them (140€ for assistants [with variability from 40 to 195€] and 130€ for lecturers [42.5-180]) or an hourly rate depending on the hours spent at hospital for the others (62.5 %): first, second move or move<3h were paid 100€ for assistants and 65€ for lecturers, 233.5€ and 236€ respectively for the third one or above 3h, 365€ and 473€ respectively above 8h. Multi-organ removals were paid a flat fee rate (60 %) or an hourly rate (40 %) as well. Beyond a threshold of 2-3hours, the hourly rate was more interesting than the flat fee rate. CONCLUSION: There were disparities in remuneration of on-call and on-duty urologists. Greater variability affected on-call flat fee rate remuneration beyond a certain threshold of hours and remuneration of multi-organ removal. These disparities should be considered in order to get a national harmonization.

[Research fellowship in the curriculum of French urologists-in-training: a study by the French Association of Urologists-in-training (AFUF)]. / Place du Master 2 recherche dans la formation des jeunes urologues français : une étude de l'AFUF.

OBJECTIVES: To assess motivations, the practical organization and the funding of a research fellowship in the training curriculum of French urologists-in-training. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An online questionnaire was sent to members of the AFUF and to participants of a research training seminar "Graines et Sol" organised by the AFU, between July and September 2013. Results are presented as the median (interquartile range). RESULTS: Sixty answers out of 115 research fellows (response rate 52%) were computed. Median age was 29 years (28-30) during the research year and male proportion 75%. The AFU grant was obtained by 57.4% of applicants, 56.4% for various grants and 47.6% for the research fellowship university grant. The annual gross amount was 29,870€ (22,710-30,195), without any significant difference between residency subdivisions. Financial supplements were obtained by being on-duty (26.2%), on-call (28.6%) and replacements (25%). The research fellowship year was done between 4th and 5th years of residency (53%), for a one-year length (96.7%) and in France (86.6%). Urologic cancerology was the thematic the most studied (60%). The research fellowship was done in view of an academic career (31.7%) or was done to wait for a post-residency position (20.8%). About a quarter was being proposed a chief-residency position before the beginning of the research year. During this year, 76.7% published. About 63% were interested in pursuing with a PhD. CONCLUSION: This study confirmed the interest for a research fellowship by French urologists-in-training. Financial support thanks to grants facilitated the conduct of a research fellowship in the aim of an academic career for most of them.

[The role of simulation in the curriculum of French urologists-in-training: a study by the French Association of Urologists-in-Training (AFUF)]. / Évaluation de l'utilisation de la simulation dans la formation des jeunes urologues français : une enquête de l'association française des urologues en formation (AFUF).

OBJECTIVES: To study the place of simulation in the training curriculum of French urologists-in-training. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An online questionnaire was sent to all residents and fellows members of the AFUF between February and May, 2013. Results are presented as the median (interquartile range). RESULTS: The answers of 125 urologists-in-training were computed (response rate 38%). They were residents in 90 cases (72%), and fellows in 35 cases (28%). Median age was 29 (27-30), male proportion 77%. All French academic urology departments were represented. Ninety of them (72%) had access to a pelvi-trainer and 66 (53%) to animal or cadaveric models, although they never used them or less than once a month in 83 and 97% of cases, respectively. Seventy-two (58%) had used a virtual-reality based simulator at least once and 38 (30%) had regular access to one, but without supervision in 64% of cases. Factors limiting simulation-based training were the lack of available simulators (70%), the lack of time (58%), the absence of incitement (34%) and supervision (20%). If these conditions were met, 86% of urologists-in-training would be ready to spend more than one hour a-week training on a simulator. CONCLUSION: This study revealed among the sample of respondents a limited use of simulation tools for skills aquisition. This was explained by a limited availability of these tools but also by an insufficient use of the tools when available.

[Results of a survey on urologic activity in 1-day surgery in Midi-Pyrénées]. / Résultats d'une enquête sur la pratique de la chirurgie ambulatoire en urologie en région Midi-Pyrénées.

INTRODUCTION: One-day surgery is an exercise whose development has grown significantly over the last decade. This survey aims at reviewing the different aspects of this practice in urology, in the second largest region of France. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted among the 57 urologists working in the Midi-Pyrénées region. A computerized questionnaire was made available on Internet. The non-responder urologists received a reminder email every week. The questionnaire included 25 questions, divided into four subgroups. RESULTS: The response rate was 57.9% (33/57 urologists). Results showed that the 1-day surgery rate was 26.4%. It was higher in the private sector (33.07 ± 17.16 vs. 20.42 ± 13.54%, P=0.04). Surgeries were made mainly in non-dedicated operating theaters (75.0%) and in the conventional list (71.8%). There was a written output protocol in 90.6% of cases (29 urologists), which was never given to the patient in 7.0% of cases (2 urologists) and never sent to the family doctor in 75.8% of cases (22 urologists). CONCLUSION: This study has shown that outpatient surgery accounted for a quarter of urologic surgery in Midi-Pyrénées region, and that the organization follows the recommendations of the International Association for Ambulatory Surgery. The main problems were the lack of information of the family doctor, and the lack of organized follow. Organizational problems were considered as the limiting factors of this activity development.

[Urogenital bleeding revealing urethral prolapse in a prepubertal girl]. / Hémorragie génitale de la petite fille: penser au prolapsus urétral.

Urethral prolapse is a complete eversion of the distal urethral mucosa through the external meatus. It occurs primarily in prepubertal, primarly Black girls. Its pathophysiology has not been clearly identified. We report a case of a 5-year-old girl who came to the Emergency Department with a 1-day history of genital pain and "vaginal bleeding". Early recognition makes differential diagnosis with sexual abuse and staging allows prompt management under general anesthesic like prolapse reduction or surgical excision.

[Pediatric anterior urethral injuries: time to take stock]. / Mise au point sur la prise en charge des traumatismes de l'urètre antérieur de l'enfant.

INTRODUCTION: Anterior urethral injuries are a rare entity in the pediatric age group. Data of the literature are limited to the injuries of the posterior urethra. The aim of this study was to take stock of the initial management of this disease, from our experience and data of the literature. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A literature review and a retrospective study were conducted. We used our department database to find all the patients treated for anterior urethral injuries at the Children's Hospital of Toulouse between 2000 and 2011. Data on patients with trauma of the anterior urethra were analysed. RESULTS: Among the 13 patients treated for urethral injuries, seven patients had trauma to the anterior urethra. The initial symptom was an acute retention of urine in three cases (43%) and urethral bleeding in six cases (85%). All patients with acute retention of urine had emergency management consisting in endoscopic realignment and urinary diversion by suprapubic catheter. Patients with hematuria were treated with paracetamol and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory. After a mean follow-up of 507 days (332-893), none had dysuria and no posttraumatic stenosis has been demonstrated in uroflowmetry. CONCLUSION: In our experience, the trauma of the anterior urethra of the child had a satisfactory development through appropriate management. Clinical and uroflometry follow-up is necessary.