Renal insufficiency has no effect on the pharmacokinetics of vicriviroc in a ritonavir-containing regimen.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Vicriviroc is a small-molecule CCR5 antagonist currently in development for the treatment of HIV in patients on a regimen containing a ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor. As renal disease and renal dysfunction are prevalent in the HIV-infected population, patients with varying degrees of renal insufficiency may receive vicriviroc, which is metabolized by cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4. The present study therefore examined the impact of renal insufficiency on the pharmacokinetics and safety of vicriviroc alone and in the presence of ritonavir, a strong CYP3A4 inhibitor. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: This study was an open-label, randomized, two-treatment crossover trial conducted in HIV-negative subjects with haemodialysis-dependent end-stage renal disease (ESRD) and healthy subjects with normal renal function matched by age, height, bodyweight and sex. Subjects received a single dose of vicriviroc 75 mg alone in one period, and in another period they received a single dose of vicriviroc 15 mg after 4 days of ritonavir 100 mg once daily. Ritonavir treatment was then continued for an additional 13 days. The two trial periods were separated by an interval of at least 3 weeks. The primary endpoints were the log-transformed area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) and the maximum plasma concentration (C(max)), and the 90% confidence intervals (CIs) of the mean differences between subjects with ESRD and matched healthy subjects. The protocol provided the option of dose modification and further study if the vicriviroc C(max) and AUC values were at least twice as high in subjects with ESRD compared with healthy subjects, or if warranted by other safety and tolerability observations. RESULTS: Twelve subjects (six with ESRD, six healthy) completed the study. When vicriviroc was administered alone, the mean vicriviroc C(max) and AUC ratio estimates (90% CI) for subjects with ESRD versus healthy subjects were 74% (53, 103) and 84% (49, 145), respectively. When ritonavir was added to the regimen, the ratio estimates (90% CI) were 81% (59, 111) and 134% (105, 171), respectively. Ritonavir plasma concentrations were substantially higher in subjects with ESRD than in healthy subjects. Treatment-emergent adverse events considered possibly or probably related to treatment occurred only during the ritonavir period of the study and in one healthy subject and two subjects with ESRD; all were of mild or moderate severity. CONCLUSIONS: ESRD had no clinically relevant impact on exposure of vicriviroc when vicriviroc was administered alone or in the presence of ritonavir. In this single-dose study, vicriviroc was well tolerated both by healthy subjects and by those with ESRD. Dose adjustment of vicriviroc is therefore not necessary in renally impaired populations.

Short-term administration of the CCR5 antagonist vicriviroc to patients with HIV and HCV coinfection is safe and tolerable.

OBJECTIVE: CCR5 antagonists block HIV cell entry through competitive binding to the CCR5 receptor present on the surface of CD4(+) cells. The CCR5 receptor is also present on CD8(+) cells involved in clearing hepatitis C virus (HCV). The goal of the present study was to examine the short-term safety of a CCR5 antagonist, vicriviroc, in patients with HIV/HCV coinfection. METHODS: A randomized, double-blind trial was conducted in 28 HIV/HCV-coinfected subjects with compensated liver disease and plasma HIV RNA below 400 copies/mL. All subjects were receiving a ritonavir-enhanced protease inhibitor regimen, to which vicriviroc (5, 10, or 15 mg/day) or placebo was added for 28 days. Clinical and laboratory evaluations were performed 21 days beyond the treatment period. RESULTS: Treatment with vicriviroc resulted in no clinically meaningful changes in HCV or HIV viral load or any immune parameters. Adverse events were equally distributed among placebo and vicriviroc groups. Transaminase elevations of grade 1 or more were reported as AEs in 1 subject receiving 10-mg vicriviroc and 1 placebo subject. Vicriviroc plasma concentrations were similar to those observed in healthy subjects. CONCLUSIONS: Short-term treatment with vicriviroc as part of a ritonavir-containing protease inhibitor-based regimen was safe and well tolerated in HIV/HCV-coinfected subjects. HIV/HCV coinfection also did not affect vicriviroc pharmacokinetics.

Drug interaction assessment following concomitant administration of posaconazole and phenytoin in healthy men.

OBJECTIVE: Posaconazole is an extended-spectrum triazole antifungal agent for the treatment and prophylaxis of invasive fungal infections. This randomized, open-label, parallel-group, multiple-dose study was conducted in healthy adult volunteers to assess the potential for a drug interaction between phenytoin and the posaconazole tablet formulation. METHODS: Subjects were randomly assigned for 10 days to one of the following treatments: posaconazole (200 mg once daily), phenytoin (200 mg once daily), or posaconazole (200 mg once daily) and phenytoin (200 mg once daily). Blood samples were collected on days 1 and 10 for pharmacokinetic evaluation of posaconazole and phenytoin concentrations. RESULTS: A total of 36 healthy men enrolled in the study. On day 1, the maximum plasma concentration (C(max)) and area under the concentration-time curve calculated from time 0-24 h post-dose (AUC(0-24)) were unchanged upon co-administration. At steady state (day 10), co-administration of posaconazole with phenytoin resulted in 44% (p = 0.012) and 52% (p = 0.007) decreases in posaconazole C(max) and AUC(0-24), respectively. These decreases in exposure corresponded with a 90% increase in steady-state clearance of orally administered posaconazole. Phenytoin C(max) and AUC(0-24) were not significantly altered upon co-administration of the two agents, 24% increase in C(max) (p = 0.196) and 25% increase in AUC(0-24) (p = 0.212) values, although inter-subject variability was observed within this group. CONCLUSION: Because co-administration of phenytoin and posaconazole significantly reduces posaconazole exposure and increases phenytoin levels in some subjects, concomitant use of these agents should be avoided unless the benefit outweighs the risk.

Antiviral activity, pharmacokinetics and safety of vicriviroc, an oral CCR5 antagonist, during 14-day monotherapy in HIV-infected adults.

OBJECTIVE: To determine antiviral activity, pharmacokinetic properties, and safety of vicriviroc, an orally available CCR5 antagonist, as monotherapy in HIV-infected patients. DESIGN AND METHODS: An ascending, multiple dose, placebo-controlled study randomized within treatment group. Forty-eight HIV-infected individuals were enrolled sequentially to dose groups of vicriviroc: 10, 25 and 50 mg twice a day, and were randomly assigned within group to receive vicriviroc or placebo (16 total patients/group) for 14 days. RESULTS: Significant reductions from baseline HIV RNA after 14 days were achieved in all active treatment groups. Suppression of viral RNA persisted 2-3 days beyond the end of treatment. Reductions of 1.0 log10 HIV RNA or greater were achieved in 45, 77 and 82% of patients in the three groups, respectively. Eighteen, 46 and 45% of subjects achieved declines of 1.5 log10 or greater in HIV RNA in the three groups, respectively. Vicriviroc was rapidly absorbed with a half-life of 28-33 h, supporting once-daily dosing. Pharmacokinetic parameters were dose linear; steady state was achieved by day 12. Two subjects experienced a transient detectable X4-tropic virus. Vicriviroc was well tolerated in all dose groups. The frequency of adverse events was similar in the vicriviroc and placebo groups: 72 and 62%, respectively. The most frequently reported adverse events included headache, pharyngitis, nausea and abdominal pain, which were not dose related. CONCLUSION: Whereas all doses were well tolerated and produced significant declines in plasma HIV RNA, total oral daily doses of 50 or 100 mg vicriviroc monotherapy for 14 days appeared to provide the most potent antiviral effect in this study.

Effect of oral posaconazole on the pharmacokinetics of cyclosporine and tacrolimus.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To analyze the pharmacokinetic properties of the immunosuppressants cyclosporine and tacrolimus when either is coadministered with oral posaconazole. DESIGN: Two single-center, open-label pharmacokinetic studies of cyclosporine in a multiple-dose design and of tacrolimus in a one-sequence, crossover, single- and multiple-dose design. SETTING: One clinical investigative center in the United States and one in the United Kingdom. SUBJECTS: Four adult heart transplant recipients in the cyclosporine study and 36 healthy adult volunteers in the tacrolimus study. INTERVENTIONS: In the cyclosporine study, patients who took an established cyclosporine dose 3 times/day for 6 weeks or longer were given posaconazole 200 mg/day for 10 days. In the tacrolimus study, subjects received tacrolimus 0.05 mg/kg/day on days 1 and 14 and posaconazole 400 mg twice/day on days 7-14. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: In the cyclosporine study, blood samples were collected on day 1 to determine cyclosporine pharmacokinetics and on day 10 to measure the pharmacokinetics of cyclosporine and posaconazole. Coadministration of posaconazole increased cyclosporine exposure and necessitated dosage reductions of 14-29% for cyclosporine in three subjects. In the tacrolimus study, blood samples were collected on days 12-14 to assess posaconazole pharmacokinetics and on days 1 and 14 for as long 72 hours after dosing to evaluate tacrolimus pharmacokinetics. Posaconazole increased the maximum blood concentration and the area under the concentration-time curve for tacrolimus by 121% and 358%, respectively, on day 14 compared with day 1 (both p=0.001). In both studies, posaconazole pharmacokinetics were unaffected. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that the dosage of cyclosporine or tacrolimus should be reduced when posaconazole therapy is started and that plasma levels of the immunosuppressant should be monitored during and at the discontinuation of posaconazole therapy so that dosages are adjusted accordingly. This recommendation is consistent with current standard of care for patients receiving cyclosporine or tacrolimus with concomitant azole antifungal therapy.

Posaconazole plasma concentrations in juvenile patients with invasive fungal infection.

Posaconazole is an orally bioavailable triazole antifungal agent for the treatment and prophylaxis of invasive fungal infection. We evaluated plasma posaconazole concentration data from juvenile (younger than 18 years; n = 12) and adult (18 to 64 years; n = 194) patients who participated in a multicenter, phase 3, open-label study that assessed the efficacy and safety of posaconazole treatment for persons who were intolerant of or had invasive fungal infection refractory to standard antifungal therapies. With the exception of one juvenile patient who received 400 mg/day as a divided dose on the day of sample collection, all patients received posaconazole at 800 mg/day as an oral suspension in divided doses. Plasma samples were analyzed through a validated liquid chromatographic-tandem mass spectrometric method with a lower limit of quantitation of 1 ng/ml. Because plasma posaconazole concentrations are relatively constant at steady state, the average of all plasma concentrations (C(av)) for each patient was calculated to provide a single steady-state plasma posaconazole concentration. A blinded data review committee reviewed all treatment outcomes. Variable posaconazole plasma concentrations were observed within both the juvenile and adult populations. Mean (median [range]) C(av) values for juvenile and adult patients were 776 ng/ml (579 ng/ml [85.3 to 2,891 ng/ml]) and 817 ng/ml (626 ng/ml [0 to 3,710 ng/ml]), respectively. Overall success rates and adverse event profiles were comparable. In conclusion, posaconazole concentrations in plasma were similar for juvenile and adult patients, suggesting that clinical outcomes are expected to be similar in adults and children with refractory invasive fungal infection.

Effects of age, gender, and race/ethnicity on the pharmacokinetics of posaconazole in healthy volunteers.

Posaconazole is a triazole antifungal for prophylaxis of invasive fungal infection and treatment of oropharyngeal candidiasis. We evaluated the effects of gender, age, and race/ethnicity (black or white) on the steady-state pharmacokinetics of posaconazole in two studies on healthy adult subjects (>or=18 years of age). Additionally, we explored the effect of P-glycoprotein expression and MDR1 genotype on posaconazole pharmacokinetics in black and white subjects. Age, gender, and race/ethnicity had no clinically relevant effects on posaconazole pharmacokinetics. No association was observed between any MDR1 single-nucleotide polymorphism and the area under the concentration-time curve for posaconazole. Posaconazole was safe and well tolerated regardless of age, gender, or race/ethnicity. In conclusion, age, gender, and race/ethnicity have no clinically relevant effects on the steady-state pharmacokinetics of posaconazole in healthy adults; therefore, dosage adjustments based on these covariates are unnecessary.

Pharmacokinetics and safety of oral posaconazole in neutropenic stem cell transplant recipients.

The pharmacokinetics of posaconazole oral suspension in neutropenic patients undergoing high-dose chemotherapy and stem cell transplantation were evaluated, and the association of plasma posaconazole exposure with the presence and severity of oral mucositis was explored in this nonrandomized, open-label, parallel-group, multiple-dose pharmacokinetic study. Thirty patients were enrolled and received one of three regimens (group I, 200 mg once daily; group II, 400 mg once daily; group III, 200 mg four times daily) for the duration of neutropenia. The mean total exposure for day 1, as shown by the area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 24 h (AUC(0-24)), was 1.96 mg . h/liter in group I and was 51% higher in group II and in group III. Increases in AUC(0-24) and maximum plasma concentration (C(max)) in groups II and III were dose related. The AUC(0-24) and C(max) values on day 1 were similar between groups II and III. There was interpatient variability of up to 68% in the pharmacokinetic values for our study population. Steady state was attained by days 5 to 6. Average steady-state plasma posaconazole trough values were 192, 219, and 414 ng/ml in groups I, II, and III, respectively. The AUC(0-24) and apparent oral clearance increased by increasing dose and dosing frequency. Mucositis appeared to reduce exposure but did not significantly affect mean total posaconazole exposure (AUC and C(max)) at steady state (P = 0.1483). Moreover, this reduction could be overcome by increasing the total dose and dosing frequency. Posaconazole was safe and well tolerated.

Effect of a nutritional supplement on posaconazole pharmacokinetics following oral administration to healthy volunteers.

We conducted a randomized, crossover study in healthy adults to examine the effects of a nutritional supplement (Boost Plus) on posaconazole pharmacokinetics. In this study, coadministration of posaconazole with Boost Plus increased the maximum concentration of posaconazole in serum and area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 72 h values 3.4- and 2.6-fold, respectively, compared to those for the fasted state.