Human ovarian cryopreservation: vitrification versus slow freezing from histology to gene expression.

Cryopreservation of ovarian tissue is one of the strategies offered to girls and women needing gonadotoxic treatment to preserve their fertility. The reference method to cryopreserve is slow freezing; vitrification is an alternative method. The aim was to evaluate which of the two is the best method for human ovarian tissue cryopreservation. Each ovary was divided into three groups: (i) fresh; (ii) slow freezing; and (iii) vitrification. An evaluation of the follicular density, quality and the expression six genes (CYP11A, STAR, GDF9, ZP3, CDK2, CDKN1A) were performed. We observed no significant difference in follicular density within these three groups. Slow freezing altered the primordial follicles compared to the fresh tissue (31.8% vs 55.9%, p = 0.046). The expression of genes involved in steroidogenesis varied after cryopreservation compared to the fresh group; CYP11A was under-expressed in slow freezing group (p = 0.01), STAR was under-expressed in the vitrification group (p = 0.01). Regarding the expression of genes involved in cell cycle regulation, CDKN1A was significantly under-expressed in both freezing groups (slow freezing: p = 0.0008; vitrification: p = 0.03). Vitrification had no effect on the histological quality of the follicles at any stage of development compared to fresh tissue. There was no significant difference in gene expression between the two techniques.

Cellular and Molecular Impact of Vitrification Versus Slow Freezing on Ovarian Tissue.

Objective: To evaluate a vitrification protocol from histology to gene expression to slow freezing. Methods: Ovaries from 12 prepubertal ewes. The same ovary was cut into fragments, studied fresh, frozen, and vitrified. Follicle morphology by hematoxylin-eosin-safran staining, vitality by Trypan Blue, and apoptosis by marking cleaved caspase-3 were studied. The expression of gene: anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH), cytochrome p450 family 11 subfamily A member 1 (CYP11A), and steroidogenic acute regulatory protein (STAR; granulosa cells); growth differentiation factor 9 (GDF9) and zona pellucida glycoprotein 3 (ZP3; oocytes); and cyclin D2 (CCND2) and cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 1A (CDKN1A; cell cycle regulation), was evaluated by reverse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction. Results: The slow freezing protocol had a significant negative impact on intact primordial follicles compared with fresh tissue (37.6% vs. 62.5%, p = 0.003). More intact follicles after vitrification were observed compared with slow freezing (p = 0.037). The apoptotic primordial follicles were similar after slow freezing and vitrification (12.6% vs. 13.9%). Concerning granulosa cell genes, slow freezing led to a trend toward overexpression of AMH messenger RNA (mRNA; p = 0.07); while vitrification led to a significant overexpression of CYP11A mRNA (p = 0.003), and a trend toward an overexpression of STAR mRNA (p = 0.06). Concerning oocyte genes, both techniques did not lead to a difference of GDF9 and ZP3 mRNA. Concerning cell cycle genes, slow freezing led to a significant underexpression of CCND2 (p = 0.04); while vitrification did not lead to a difference for CCND2 and CDKN1A mRNA. Conclusion: Vitrification preserved follicular morphology better than slow freezing and led to gene overexpressed, while slow freezing led to gene underexpressed. Impact statement The preservation of female fertility and in particular the cryopreservation of ovarian tissue (OT) is a major public health issue aimed at improving the quality of life of patients after gonadotoxic treatments. The use of slow freezing of this OT, which is the reference technique, is not optimal due to tissue alteration. The alternative would be vitrification. This study compares these two techniques. We have highlighted that vitrification preserved follicular morphology better than slow freezing and led to gene overexpressed, while slow freezing led to gene underexpressed.

GP130 signaling and the control of naïve pluripotency in humans, monkeys, and pigs.

The leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF)/glycoprotein (GP) 130/Janus kinase (JAK)/signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) 3 signaling pathway is a hallmark of naïve pluripotency in mice. In this review, we discuss the role of the LIF/GP130/JAK/STAT3 pathway in supporting the naïve-state pluripotency in human, monkey, and pig pluripotent stem cells (PSCs). We highlight the role of LIF/GP130/JAK/STAT3 signaling in reprogramming conventional human and monkey PSCs to naïve-like pluripotency. We analyze published single-cell RNA sequencing datasets of human and monkey embryos and note that the main components of the GP130/JAK/STAT3 pathway are expressed in pluripotent cells at preimplantation stages. We conclude that there is a growing body of evidence supporting the involvement of GP130/JAK/STAT3 in the regulation of naïve pluripotency in non-rodent species including humans, monkeys, and pigs.

A Panel of Embryonic Stem Cell Lines Reveals the Variety and Dynamic of Pluripotent States in Rabbits.

Conventional rabbit embryonic stem cell (ESC) lines are derived from the inner cell mass (ICM) of pre-implantation embryos using methods and culture conditions that are established for primate ESCs. In this study, we explored the capacity of the rabbit ICM to give rise to ESC lines using conditions similar to those utilized to generate naive ESCs in mice. On single-cell dissociation and culture in fibroblast growth factor 2 (FGF2)-free, serum-supplemented medium, rabbit ICMs gave rise to ESC lines lacking the DNA-damage checkpoint in the G1 phase like mouse ESCs, and with a pluripotency gene expression profile closer to the rabbit ICM/epiblast profiles. These cell lines can be converted to FGF2-dependent ESCs after culture in conventional conditions. They can also colonize the rabbit pre-implantation embryo. These results indicate that rabbit epiblast cells can be coaxed toward different types of pluripotent stem cells and reveal the dynamics of pluripotent states in rabbit ESCs.