Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Contemp Clin Dent ; 4(1): 13-9, 2013 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23853446

RESUMO

PURPOSE: This article reports the clinical outcomes observed in a large number of patients receiving block bone allograft used for sinus augmentation and delayed implant placement. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In total, 28 patients (13 males) with a mean age of 49.8 ± 10.1 years (range: 33-67 years) were included in this case series. All selected patients suffered from severe alveolar ridge atrophy in the posterior maxilla and required bone augmentation procedures, followed by implant placement after 6 months. All patients were followed for 18 months after the grafting, with scheduled monthly visits and/or more frequent visits if required. The survival rates for both the bone blocks and placed implants were then evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 42 blocks and 90 implants were placed. Only one bone graft and 5 implants failed; the survival rate was 97.2% and 95.5% for the bone grafts and implants, respectively. The graft failed due to the onset of post-surgical infectious sinusitis, while in some patients' implants showed absence of osteointegration at the end of the healing phase. Of note, all failed implants were observed in heavy smokers; in all other patients, blocks and implants were successful. CONCLUSIONS: This preliminary case series suggests that the grafting of bone allograft followed by delayed implant placement may be a promising strategy for sinus augmentation. More extended and larger follow-up studies are needed to confirm this preliminary data.

2.
Blood Transfus ; 9(1): 41-5, 2011 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21235853

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Although autologous bone is considered the gold standard among the grafting materials used in implant therapy, it does have a number of drawbacks, in particular morbidity at the site of donation and the limited amount of bone available. To overcome these limitations a number of alternative bone materials have been employed in the last few years. In this study we report the results of the use of homologous fresh-frozen bone from a tissue bank in patients undergoing reconstruction of bone defects in the oral cavity. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Between June 2004 and October 2008, 14 consecutive patients underwent bone reconstruction with fresh-frozen bone from a tissue bank. Four to eight months after surgery, implants were placed in the newly formed bone. RESULTS: No problems were recorded during the post-operative course. In all cases treatment was successful and osteointegrated implants were placed in the newly formed bone after 4-8 months. All implants showed good osteointegration (100% overall success rate, mean follow-up 20 months), allowing loading with a fixed cemented prosthesis. CONCLUSIONS: Our results support the previous findings that homologous fresh-frozen bone can be considered a valid alternative to autologous bone for the reconstruction of bone defects in the oral cavity in patients undergoing implant therapy.


Assuntos
Transplante Ósseo/métodos , Criopreservação , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Bucais , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Transplante Autólogo , Transplante Homólogo
3.
Cell Tissue Bank ; 9(1): 41-6, 2008 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17929198

RESUMO

Intraoral bone defects may be treated using autologous grafts, homologous grafts, heterologous grafts or synthetic products. Autologous bone is now considered the gold standard for bone grafting procedures. Homologous fresh frozen bone, provided by bone banks, is frequently utilized by orthopaedic surgeons because it is considered a safe material from immunological and viral points of view. In the cases reported here, homologous bone was used to repair some osseous defects without changing the surgical protocol utilized for autologous bone procedures. The main advantages of this strategy are low morbidity, shorter surgical times, more comfort and less risk of infection for the patient as well as the greater availability of bone.


Assuntos
Transplante Ósseo/métodos , Criopreservação/métodos , Cirurgia Bucal/métodos , Osso e Ossos/patologia , Osso e Ossos/cirurgia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Transplante Homólogo
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...